Facts: On December 16, 2005, James M. Eaton, Jr., and Marguerite Eaton filed a complaint against Waldrop alleging that Waldrop had fraudulently induced James to deed certain property situated in Jefferson County ("the property") to Waldrop and Marguerite, jointly with a right of survivorship, and that Waldrop had subsequently fraudulently induced Marguerite to transfer her interest in the property to Waldrop. James and Marguerite requested that the court set aside the deed executed by James transferring the property to Marguerite and Waldrop and requested "other, further or different relief as may be just and proper"; they also demanded a trial by jury. Waldrop answered the complaint on January 26, 2006. Marguerite subsequently died, and James, as the executor of her estate, was substituted as a plaintiff.…
b. Union supporters could get workers to sign cards of a petition and present the results to management along with a threat to strike if management ignores their request…
Firstly, Alejandro’s team members did not view him as an authentic leader. They had no respect for or confidence in him probably because they sensed his self doubt so they disregarded his plan and did not pay attention. Secondly, Dan answered his phone and left for his weekly tennis game which everyone seemed to know about except Alejandro. As soon as the other team members saw that Dan wasn’t interested enough to participate in the meeting, they also lost all interest and followed through with the disrespect because they viewed Alejandro’s plan as just another idea so they began to come up with a plan of their own. Alejandro’s first mistake was that he had no confidence in himself. For example, when Dan initially assigns him with the task, he began to doubt himself and questions the reasons why Dan chose him rather than the “old hands” with more experience. This shows that he wasn’t aware of his strengths and weaknesses so he was unable to present his plan effectively and confidently. Additionally, Alejandro failed to get the other managers involved in his plan to help motivate the other team members.…
Use this worksheet to develop and evaluate supporting evidence for your claims when planning your essay. You can also use this worksheet to analyze and evaluate the writing of others. In the spaces below, write your (or the author’s) topic sentence, main points of support/subtopics, specific evidence, types of evidence, appeals, modes of development, and conclusion.…
In recent years, the state of Maryland has decided a number of cases dealing with liability for injuries that occurred on the property of the defendant involving two different parties.…
Connie Spears, whom had with a history of blood clots, arrived at Christus Santa Rosa Hospital’s emergency room of Texas in 2010 with unbearable leg discomfort. She was diagnosed with something minor and went home only to find herself in agonizing pain few days later. Emergency personnel escorted her to another hospital and found a massive blood clot and tissue damage. The doctors surgically removed both legs in order to save her life.…
Question 1. Did Officer Smith have reasonable suspicion to make the initial stop of this vehicle?…
Under Armour, was founded by Kevin Plank, in 1996, one of the major sports clothing and accessories companies in all over the world. They are a supplier of a wide range of sportswear and casual apparel mainly focusing on high technology sportswear for professional athletes. Depending on the high technological and differentiated product lines, Under Armour has dramatic growth rate from 2000 to 2007. In addition, it is supplying over 100 NCAA division 1A football program and 30 NFL team, and opened self-owned retail and outlet stores in 2007. As the result, they had 43 present of the total U.S. performance apparel business sold sporting goods stores, even higher than other two main competitors which Nike and Adidas. Under Armour has 93 percent of sale in U.S. market and 84 percent of sale on apparel; plus international markets and other product lines, it totally profit 0.61 billion in 2007. By comparing with Nike and Adidas in the same year, Nike grossed 18.6 billion and Adidas 15.6 billion. The consequence, Under Armour mostly focuses on the domestic market and apparel but neglects the international market and lack diversification on their product. Although they won the sale in domestic market and apparel in this battle, their revenue was much less than Nike’s and Adidas’s which they lose in the entire market and products in sports clothing and accessories domain. Moreover, Under Armour does not have a patent on any of the materials used in its products; it creates the most critical issues, which lack of proprietary product rights. As the result, Under Armour is facing the problem on losing the international market, diversifying product lines and protection on their technology. If Under Armour still wants to stay on top of its game, they have better to overcome those problem.…
be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Cornell University Law School, No Date).” The first part of this section states that no warrant will be given unless there is probable cause that will lead the judge or magistrate to believe that there is a very good reason to invade the privacy of a citizen. If there is not enough evidence for the judge to justify the signing of a search warrant, then the officer needs to try and find more evidence that will bolster his or her case.…
The use of a case study analysis can help a student or group apply the best theory to an individual’s problems or issues. The green team will face the challenges as therapist to provide the necessary problem solving skills that may be suitable to this case study. Ana is the adult female in this case study who is face with different types of problems or issues. The green team will analyze the information, apply best theory, and provide results that will be appropriate for Ana’s major stressors. As there may be no wrong or right answer, it is the work of great minds that will come together and provide clear understanding to illustrate a good logic and rational case study.…
First of we have to clarify what both of these arguments are and what there are saying. The logical problem of evil explains that the existence of evil is not consistent with the existence of a God. The evidential problem is just the opposite. For example, in Rowe’s essay, he used the example of a suffering fawn. The evidential problem states that if there is an omniscient being, how could he allow this kind of suffering and evil? If there is an omniscient being, couldn’t he stop this kind of evil? That is there argument. But the logical problem tells us that there has to be some kind of good or well-being of suffering and evil. That this evil will lead to good. That is what they use to back up that argument.…
The NLRB’s effective standard for employers considering requesting a good faith reasonable doubt the majority of the employees support the union and there are three options and are as follow:…
The life of an artist stems from the originality of their art; however, sometimes the public does not understand or appreciate the art the artist dedicated wholeheartedly to. A Hunger Artist by Franz Kafka explored the ambition of an artist to achieve a feat no one had ever accomplished before, but instead of receiving admiration from the spectators the artist is faced with a cold response. The hunger artist used fasting as a form of artistic endeavor for his own liking, but the art is soon turned into a mode of entertainment just to please the public’s fascination, even though they do not appreciate the deeper meaning behind his art. Being the only one who could truly understand his art completely, the hunger artist is never satisfied and…
A). The Union argues that the company has previously credited employee’s the time worked with other shops and it has been a past company practice. The Union was able to prove four examples of this type of behavior within the company and five examples of employees who were promoted to a journeyman position prior to completing their apprenticeship. The Union states that this becomes part of the employee’s collective bargaining agreement. The company claims to have only credited outside service when hiring new employees and the Union believes it should also include when an employee’s service is interrupted. The Union also states that since the company has not questioned the employee’s…
According to the definition of mandatory bargaining, the usage of a camera to gain intel about the theft of employee or employer property in a certain area is a voluntarily bargained unit. Though the contention will remain to the extent that this type of electronic imaging should or can be used in the workplace, it does not fall under the mandatory items described above that deal most often with hourly wages and similar issues. The management complied with verbal demands to have the camera removed, but the union felt the rights of employees were jeopardized by the unknowing videoing by management, however management was very clear there were cameras all over the property, but they were in plain sight, which makes this situation more applicable since the cameras were intentionally hidden in an air vent. This type of action is a very good reason why collective bargaining is such a long and drawn out…