Preview

Bus 508 Coca Cola Pepsi

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2585 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bus 508 Coca Cola Pepsi
Coca-Cola vs. PepsiCo: Financial Management

Dr. Tressa Shavers
Strayer University

Coca-Cola vs. PepsiCo: Financial Management This paper will examine Coca-cola and PepsiCo financial ratios and profit for the year 2007 and 2008 using the liquidity measurement ratio, profitability indicator’s ratio, debt Ratio, Operating performance ratio, cash flow ratio, and investment valuation ratio. It will explain both company’s liabilities, and a few personal opinions that could better both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo profits and stockholder’s investment. It will also discuss what non-financial criteria the company could consider when choosing between these two investment options.
Using the current ratio, discuss what conclusions you can make about each company’s ability to pay current liabilities (debt). Financial ratios are used to compare the financial condition of a firm to that of similar firms for the purposes of building interests for shareholders, building the confidence of creditors, and for fostering competence among the firm’s own management. Liquidity ratios evaluate a firm’s ability to satisfy its short-term obligations as they come due. An important form of liquidity ratio is the current ratio, and it gives a general picture of the company’s financial health as it reflects the efficiency of the company to convert its products into liquid assets. A high current ratio implies the greater capability of a company to allocate its current finances into paying its current liabilities. The acceptable current ratio value for most industrial firms is 1.5, while a value of 2.0 indicates that a company has twice as many assets as its liabilities. A ratio under 1.0 expresses the persistent inability of a company to meet its current liabilities. Albeit it shows a business’ general financial strength, this ratio is not a direct indicator of a company’s tendency into bankruptcy (Smart & Megginson, 2009). In the case of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and PepsiCo,



References: Current Ratio Definition - What is Current Ratio? (n.d.). Investor Glossary. Retrieved March 11, 2011, from http://www.investorglossary.com/current-ratio.htm Dividend Payout Ratio Calculation Loth, R. (n.d.). Cash Flow Indicator Ratios: Dividend Payout Ratio. Investopedia. Retrieved March 11, 2011 from http://www.investopedia.com/university/ratios/cash-flow-indicator/ratio4.asp Loth, R Loth, R. (n.d.). Debt Ratios: The Debt Ratio. Investopedia, . Retrieved March 12, 2011, from http://www.investopedia.com/university/ratios/debt/ratio2.asp Loth, R Loth, R. (n.d.). Operating Performance Ratios: Fixed-Asset Turnover. Investopedia. Retrieved March 12, 2011, from http://www.investopedia.com/university/ratios/operating-performance/ratio1.asp Loth, R Loth, R. (n.d.). Profitability Indicator Ratios: Introduction. Investopedia. Retrieved March 12, 2011, from http://www.investopedia.com/university/ratios/profitability-indicator/default.asp Loth, R Price/earnings ratio Definition. (n.d.). InvestorWords.com. Retrieved December 5, 2010, from http://www.investorwords.com/3811/price_earnings_ratio.html Smart, S PepsiCo. Inc Annual Report 2009. Financial Highlights. Retrieved March 2, 2011 from www.pepsi.com/annualreport2009 Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    EGT1 Task 3

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The rate of return on total assets is the next ratio. This is calculated by taking net income and adding interest expense; then dividing them by average total assets. This ratio measures a business’s success in using their assets to earn a profit. In 2011, the ratio was 12.30% and in 2012 it was 14.28%. This was a pretty good rise and sits well with the industry averages of 17.20 to 8.60%. I would say this is a strength as well for Company…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Current Ratio: The ability for a company to pay short term obligations is measured by this ratio. In 2011 Company G moved from 1.86 to 1.77. Compared to the 1.9 Home Center Retail Benchmarks industry ratio, the numbers are below standards. Current Ratio represents values above 2 quartile industry benchmarks data (1.4 to 2.1). Current Ratio represents a weakness for Company G.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc 280 Final

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An official financial analysis for a specific company needs two years of financial data from the company and from a competitor in the same industry. This financial analysis is between PepsiCo, Inc. and Coca-Cola. Pepsi and Coca-Cola dominate the beverage market worldwide. In addition to sodas, they also distribute a variety of water and energy drinks. Based on the analysis, the investor will be able to make a better investment choice.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mgt 5000

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    11. ABC & Co. has sales of $291,200, cost of goods sold of $163,300, net profit of $11,360, net fixed assets of $154,500, and current assets of $89,500. What is the total asset turnover rate?…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    fin 341

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liquidity ratios show the relationship between the current assets and current liabilities. These ratios provide us with a view of the company’s ability to pay its current liabilities. KR has a current ratio of 0.72 and a quick ratio of 0.25. WFM has a current ratio of 2.15 and a quick ratio of 1.77. Both companies’ consists largely of inventory. If both KR and WFM sold their entire inventory, they would be in the same comparable position. These ratios show that WFM is more liquid than KR.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Accounting Quiz

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Which financial ratio indicates the percentage of profit that is paid out as dividends?…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to compare the major players in the beverage/soft drink industry, Pepsi Co. & Coca Cola Co. This paper will give you sound information on which company to invest in as well as taking a deeper look at both companies over all. My analysis will be made based on the company’s income statements, horizontal, vertical analysis, balances sheets and financial statement ratios. This along with other information should give you a clear picture of which company is the best company to invest in.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    University of Phoenix. (2012). Financial Analysis: The Big Picture. Retrieved from University of Phoenix, ACC561-Accounting website.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Verizon vs Att

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This section will discuss ratio analysis for the following ratios: current ratio, quick (acid-test) ratio, average collection period, debt to assets ratio, debt to equity ratio, interest coverage ratio, net profit margin, and price to earnings ratio. Depending on the end user which ratio carries more importance, however, all must be familiar with ratio analysis. Details on each company's performance for each of these areas can be found in the attached ratio analysis worksheet.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coca-cola total current assets were 39% and 34.83% in 2004 and 2005. Liquidity of PepsiCo decreased in 2005 and The Coca-cola increased in 2005. The assets of Coca-cola were 62% and 65.17% in 2004 and 2005. The current liabilities of PepsiCo were $6,753.00 and $9,406.00 in 2004 and 2005. The total assets were 24% and 29.65%. The total assets for Coca-cola were 35% and 33.43%. The liabilities of PepsiCo increased while the current debt of Coca-cola decreased. For both companies the total liabilities in 2005 were 55.08% and the total assets were 44.02%. The equity of PepsiCo was 48% of assets in 2004 and assets was 44.92% in 2005. In 2005 PepsiCo shareholder reduces the inventory. In 2005 the shares were 55.59% of assets for Coca-cola but in 2004 it showed shares there were only 51%. The shares for Coca-cola have been more than…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DQ 2

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    There are a number of comparative ratios that are available, which include Dun and Bradstreet, Value Line, and the Annual Statement Studies published by Risk Management Associates. When a person is out looking at these sources, he or she has to understand that each source has a different emphasis. For example, Dun and Bradstreet looks at proprietorships, and sells its information to lenders and banks. Thus, D&B has more of a focus on current liabilities and assets, and not market ratios. Moreover, same size companies, in the same industry can use different accounting methods. For example, one organization may use a First In First Out approach, another may use First In Last Out approach. The difference of these approaches could alter several aspects of an organization’s financial data.…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of companies. Another ratio that is helpful to determine a company’s liquidity is the Current…

    • 2124 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc 280 Final: Coke/Pepsi

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The significance of the trend analyses on net sales and net income is that PepsiCo has been steadily increasing its sales over the past 5 years (for a total increase of $9 billion), since 2001. Clearly, they must have sound marketing and advertising strategies, in order to not just maintain their sales figures, but to maintain a growing increase each year. Up until 2005, they were performing equally admirably at increasing their net income as well. While their net income for 2005 is still an impressive 69.9% higher than in 2001, they went from 3 years of massive increases, to a slight decrease. Since the sales figures increased from 2004-2005, it’s not a question of having a “sales slump”. This means they must have increased expenses dramatically during 2005. We know this because net income is tabulated from the income statement, which consists of revenues and expenses. Logically, if sales have continued to increase, yet net income has fallen slightly, then there must have been a substantial…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Through this paper Pepsi and Coca Cola will be fully evaluated. A stock market analysis will be presented to a client as part of a professional consultation process. A background of both Pepsi and Coca will be accompanied in order to have a full synopsis of each company. The stock trends will be examined for both investment options. The stock trends will be based from the intial public offering day to January 2, 2012. Current events surrounding both companies will be displayed in order to assist the analysis. Lastly, we will analyze the financial statements of both companies. After a complete review of both companies a recommendation will be made as the better investment opportunity for the client.…

    • 3170 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Magloff, David. "General Motors Co." Growth, Profitability, and Financial Ratios for (GM) from Morningstar.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Dec. 2014…

    • 782 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays