Preview

Bush Administration

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bush Administration
The final assignment for this course is a Final Paper. The purpose of the Final Paper is to give you an opportunity to apply much of what you have learned about American national government to an examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on terror. The Final Paper represents 20% of the overall course grade.

Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating captured prisoners. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at "GITMO." Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012).

An assumption made by the Bush administration in selecting this location was that it was beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. The administration wanted to avoid any judicial oversight of how it handled detainees, characterized as "enemy combatants." A possible legal challenge to indefinite detention with no formal charges or judicial proceedings might arise from the habeas corpus provision of the Constitution.

Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention. Some legal commentators refer to the right of habeas corpus as the "great writ of liberty" because it is a prisoner's ultimate recourse to an impartial judge who can review the possibility that he is being held

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments. In 2011, Congress specifically prohibited the expenditure of funds to transfer GITMO prisoners to detention facilities in the continental United States, making it virtually impossible to try them in civilian courts. As of April 2012, 169 remained in detention at GITMO (Sutton, 2012).…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi vs Rumsfeld

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Yaser Esam Hamdi, an American citizen, was captured in Afghanistan shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11th. Hamdi was classified as an “enemy combatant” by the United States. His father filed a petition of Habeas Corpus that his fifth and fourteenth amendments were in violation. Although the petition did not specify on the actual circumstances of Hamdi’s capture and detention, the record indicated that Hamdi went to Afghanistan to do “relief work” less than two months before September 11th and could have not received military training. The Special Advisor to the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, Michael Mobbs, issued a response, outlining the Government’s position. The district court found the “Mobbs Declaration” insufficient in supporting the Government’s case. The Mobbs Declaration provided details regarding Hamdi’s trip to Afghanistan, his affiliation with the Taliban during a time when the Taliban was battling U.S. allies, and lastly his surrender of an assault rifle. The District Court found that the Mobbs Declaration, standing alone, did not support Hamdi’s detention and ordered the Government to turn over numerous materials. The Fourth Circuit reversed, stressing that it was undisputed that Hamdi was captured in an active combat zone, no factual inquiry or evidentiary hearing allowed Hamdi to be heard or to rebut the Government’s claims were necessary or proper. If the Mobbs Declaration was accurate, it provided a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that the President had constitutionally detained Hamdi, the court ordered the habeas petition dismissed. The appeals court held that, “no citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress”. This provides that The AUMF’s “necessary and appropriate force” language provided the authorization for Hamdi’s detention. Also that Hamdi is entitled only to a limited judicial inquiry into his detention’s rationality under…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The final assignment for this course is a Final Paper. The purpose of the Final Paper is to give you an opportunity to apply much of what you have learned about American national government to an examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on terror. The Final Paper represents 20% of the overall course grade.…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fallon Jr., R. H. (2010). THE SUPREME COURT, HABEAS CORPUS, AND THE WAR ON TERROR: AN ESSAY ON LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE. Columbia Law Review, 110(2), 352-398.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    soil since the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001. Unlike the proceeding at Guantanamo Bay,…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the government leased that portion of the land from Cuba, for most of its time there was a lack of government oversight (Ryan 14). Some were U.S. citizens and others not (Hoffer 2017). It was possible for the U.S. to have their. In Allan A. Ryan’s book, “The 9/11 Terror Cases: Constitutional Challenges in the War Against Al Qaeda” he explored the 9/11 cases with both historical and legal context. The Unitary Code of Military Justice (1950) established military law and within outlined military commissions (Ryan 88-89). The four detainees in the 9/11 cases were subjected to the UCMJ standards although, a military commission rarely occurs in the United States (Ryan 89). One possible reason for having the cases held in a military court as opposed to the U.S. federal court was that the standards were lower, though similar. Another reason is that the government feared having court cases heard in U.S. federal courts. They could be set free due to insufficient evidence (Hoffer 2017). Plus, the voluntary acceptance of the Geneva Conventions code for treating prisoners during wartime could be ignored since member of Al Qaeda were not included (Ryan…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of paying a lot of taxes for this prison they should use this money for other needs like feeding people, house they provide them with clothing the ones that actually need it or maybe conduct research on things or pay off debt. Its costs an approximately 445 million dollars just to be able to operate every year. (Guantanamo bay undermines security must be closed) but if they are moved into a federal prison in the U.S it would only cost somewhere between 265-305 million. It’s a huge difference it’s way better to move the inmates.It also cost about 3 million doller per detainee and they don’t even get treated like they should be? If you ask me it’s unfair to taxpayers. At first they couldn’t even build enough room for every prisoner fast enough. The camp had no electricity and only a little amount of water. They were forced to sleep on the floor and also clothing and food were scarce. (Gay ) That was also a huge waste of money, why couldn’t they first provide the things required then move them in one by one. If they are transferred to the a U.S prison it would only cost 78,000 per…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will explain civil liberties, habeas corpus, and the war on terror. It will show how…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guantanamo Bay is a US prison for terrorists and other threatening people, located off of US soil. This means that the processes that go on in the institution, legally, do not need to follow US rules. Many painful and tortuous things are performed on the prisoners, such as force feeding and the topic of this essay, water boarding, where the victim is made to feel as though they are drowning. Although Gitmo is legal/allowed to an extent, it still begs the question how the guards consciously perform such cruel acts and what I would do if I were faced with the decision of torturing a prisoner or not.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. The War and the Writ Habeas corpus and security in an age of terrorism…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties History

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Habeas corpus and the war on terror have only grown increasingly relevant as days pass. One of the more well-known uses of habeas corpus stems from the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States. It was on the wake of this historical tragedy that President Bush not only launched a war on terrorism, but the USA PATRIOIT Act of 2001 was passed. As a wartime measure, the PATRIOT Act allowed federal authorities to arrest and hold suspected terrorists without filing formal charges. Individuals detained on suspicion of terrorism were not entitled to an attorney (Levin-Waldman, 2012). In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), the Supreme Court ruled the prisoners had limited rights at his or her disposal with which to challenge the enemy combatant characterization (Foley, 2007). The debate over habeas corpus has erupted in an emotional time of healing for United States citizens. What is difficult to grasp is that in the midst of tragedy, in the center of emotional turmoil, in the middle of a nation full of questions, habeas corpus is a civil liberty, like many others that desperately required clarification in a changing…

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The term habeas corpus was first used in England in the 14th century, but didn’t become official until the 1679 Habeas Corpus Act was passed in Great Britain. Prior to the Revolutionary War, British soldiers were holding colonist without allowing them to exercise their right of habeas corpus. This was one reason that sparked the Revolutionary War. As a result, the founding fathers of America added habeas corpus to The Constitution of the United States, saying that "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it" (Article 1, Section 9) (The Columbia Encyclopedia. 2011, p.1). To this day, citizens that have been charged with a crime enjoy the right of habeas corpus, usually in federal appeals. Habeas Corpus protects the civil liberty of citizens, as it assures them a chance to be heard by the highest court in the land. In contemporary America, as it relates to the war on terror, habeas corpus has been suspended in some cases, especially…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays