Preview

Bush V. Gore Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
342 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bush V. Gore Case Study
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), is the United States Supreme Court decision that resolved the dispute surrounding the 2000 presidential election. Three days earlier, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring. Eight days earlier, the Court unanimously decided the closely related case of Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, 531 U.S. 70 (2000).

In a per curiam decision, the Court ruled that there was an Equal Protection Clause violation in using different standards of counting in different counties and ruled that no alternative method could be established within the time limit set by Title 3 of the United States Code (3 U.S.C.), § 5 ("Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors"), which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This officer observed Sanders was hold his left wrist with his right hand. This officer photographed Sanders for further documentation. Sanders was escorted to a treatment room and he was secure to the bed. Sanders complained he was in severe pain and had limiter mobility of his right hand. Sanders was scene by a doctor and stated the following "I was in the back seat of the car and adjusted my wrists and heard a popping sound" "I twisted wrong with the cuffs on" Sanders also now claimed his right shoulder was injured. Sanders also told the doctor he broke his wrist twice once in a Humvee accident and when picking up a pallet.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Executive Privilege Dbq

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    Hamdi v. Runsfeld - Was regarding the government's policy on captured enemy combatants. Post 9/11 2001 with the war on terrorism, The Bush administration to the position that any supporters of the enemy could be detained…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article Florida v. Harris: Turning Police Dogs into Search Warrants on a Leash, John Whitehead questions the intentions of both police officers and Supreme Court judges, who seem to be condoning and ruling in favor of unconstitutional searches of American citizens. The criteria for what qualifies as probable cause has now been left up to the judgement of an officer. With variance in why a search should be conducted, Americans are left in the dark when it comes to their own rights. Although the Constitution outlines these rights, their interpretations gets lost when the Supreme Court rules in the favor or those who seem to be abusing their power rather than using it to protect the American people. .…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 4 Pros And Cons

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Whoever proves the Supreme Court’s decision based on constitutionality wins. The round shall not stray to the effectiveness or benefits of Section 4 and instead should focus on constitutionality.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Katzenbach (1966) and Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was called into question. In 1966, South Carolina argued Congress did get the authority from Section 2 of the 15th Amendment to pass the Voting Rights Act. The also stated, had Congress had the power from the 15th Amendment, it would violate the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment. The court dismissed their claim and stated the right to due process is guaranteed to the individual and not the state. Fast-forward to 2013 and sections 4(b) and 5 of the Voting Rights Act are challenged because Shelby County contended they violated the 10th Amendment (the national government infringing upon the sovereignty of the states) and Article IV of the Constitution (the states are not treated equally). The court ruled in favor of Shelby County citing the Coverage Clause of Section 4(b) did not treat the states equally and subjugated several to voter law scrutiny. However, South Carolina made the same arguments in 1966, but the court rejected those claims. The biggest difference between the two is the earlier sought to invalidate the entire Act while the most recent only challenged parts of…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brennan states that one of the proposed majority decisions is changed into a dissent before the final ruling is announced, then the Justices will figure out the final form of the opinion. In “Separate but Equal”, a dissent never existed, the Supreme Court just skips it and goes right to writing the final form. This article shows how the Supreme Courts decisions can cause major issues and controversies among the country. “Separate but Equal” proved to be a great example of all the controversies and problems that can result from decisions made by the Supreme Court by dealing with the issue of Segregation in public…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In November 26, 2000 the election between Gore and Bush made history with their controversial electoral votes, it was total mayhem. The only reason why Gore didn’t win was because the Florida Supreme Court decided to stop counting the ballots and to just give Bush the presidential spot. Gore’s team took forever, they even passed the due date they were suppose to turn in the ballots. There was so little time to count all those ballots that weren’t completely punched out, the news and the people went insane, up to the point were they even had strikes, the people needed answers and a president as soon as possible. There was about 175,010 ballots that weren’t counted. Gore gained about half a million plus more popular votes than Bush did, and personally…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The Court recognizes in Swain v. Alabama that a "State's purposeful or deliberate denial to Negroes on account of race of participation as jurors in the administration of justice violates the Equal Protection Clause. (1172)…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Electoral College violates political equality and document D is proof. You will agree without a doubt that the Electoral College weighs some of the citizens votes more heavily than others. In document , Illinois has a larger population than Washington D.C and 12 other states combined. Those 12 states have more of a say in the Electoral College. A chart in document A has various sources to support its evidence. Not to mention the citizens of Illinois and larger states have proportionately less power in the presidential election than other citizens in smaller states. As a result we should most definitely eliminate the Electoral College. The Electoral College is an unfair system. California is the third largest state but it has the most electoral votes than any other states. The smallest number of electoral votes, the lowest a states can have is 3 because each state has at least one representative. A candidate could win the electoral votes with only 11 states with a total of 256 votes. Connecticut only has seven votes it's not the biggest but it's still an important state in the United States of America. The Electoral College should be abolished because it's unfair and complicated system.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment is arguably the most controversial issue with regards to the constitution since it was ratified in 1787. Under the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” However, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) directly contradicts the First Amendment by regulating the financing and advertising of Political campaigns. The two features of BCRA are the restriction of soft money and issue advocacy. First, this act bans the raising of soft money by federal candidates or national parties and restricts the spending of soft money by state parties. Second, this act created a new election law, electioneering communication, which prohibits the use of political advertisements that “refers” to a federal candidate within thirty days of a primary election or sixty days of a general elections. The First Amendment is arguably the most controversial issue with regards to the constitution since it was ratified in 1787. Under the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” However, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) directly contradicts the First Amendment by regulating the financing and advertising of Political campaigns. The two features of BCRA are the restriction of soft money and issue advocacy. First, this act bans the raising of soft money by federal candidates or national parties and restricts the spending of soft money by state parties. Second, this act created a new election law, electioneering communication, which prohibits the use of political advertisements…

    • 997 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gore Case Study

    • 1842 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are other clear indications of organization structure if one were to use the definition…

    • 1842 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To the extent this country has advanced in technology and modern conveniences, some laws have not changed since the early days of the establishment of our nation. One area in particular which has in more recent years caused controversy is the function of the Electoral College. The functionality and purpose of the Electoral College has become outdated and should be revamped in order to bring the system in to the twenty-first century. The world has changed and representation through the Electoral College is no longer functional. The Electoral College should be abolished and replaced by a system which allows for a more even distribution of the popular vote nationwide. William Beaman, author of “Words We Remember” has such a negative view of the Electoral College for many reasons but he specifically feels:…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Minor v. Happersett case, Mrs. Virginia Minor stated she was a “… white citizen of the United States,” and should have the right to vote in the 1872 elections. However, Chief Justice C. J. Waite provided a detailed description of what is considered to be a “citizen,” but since the Fourteenth Amendment cites only “male” citizens have the right to vote it was up to the states to make changes to the definition of citizen, citing “If the law is wrong, it ought to be changed; but the power for that is not with us (the Court).” Also, the same can be said for the United States v Susan B. Anthony case, where she voted in 1872, but since she was declared a “woman” she did not have the right to vote. Besides preventing the vote for women, the Court decided cases on denying professional status and the right to divorce. In Bradwell v. Illinois, Bradwell believed that Fourteenth Amendment granted her, “as a citizen,” the right to practice law in the State of Illinois. The Court ruled that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not include the right to practice a profession, declaring only the state had the right to grant professional status. In Waldron v. Waldron, the Court ruled against Mrs. Waldron claiming the reasons she presented to granting a divorce was “inadmissible, because of irrelevancy” ruling for the husband denying the…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison is considered one of the most important cases in U.S. Supreme Court history. This landmark case is of great importance in the American political system because John Marshall, chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, was able to bring respect and prestige to the Court. The Marshall Court announced that a court has the power to declare an act of Congress void if it contradicts the Constitution. For the first time in history, the Supreme Court asserted its role in reviewing federal legislation, a principle today also known as judicial review. Courts have the ability to review bylaws, judicial decisions or administrative regulations for possible violations of existing laws, individual state Constitutions, or the…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays