Preview

Bush V. Schiavo Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
802 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bush V. Schiavo Case Study
Bush v Schiavo 885 So. 2d 321 (2004)
a. Plaintiff: Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida
b. Defendant: Michael Schiavo, Spouse of Theresa Schiavo

II. Court Decision By: Supreme Court of Florida

III. Procedural History: Mr. Schiavo requested the guardianship court to permit him to end the life-prolonging procedures that were supporting his wife, who was in a persistent vegetative state. Theresa Schiavo’s parents, Robert and Mary Schindler, opposed the motion and brought the case in to trial. After the court granted Mr. Schiavo to end the life-prolonging procedures, the case was brought to the appellate level which affirmed the decision. Although the guardianship court’s order was affirmed during the appeal, allowing Mr. Schiavo to stop the procedures, the litigation continued because Mr. and Ms. Schindler’s filed a motion for relief from judgment under Florida Civil Procedure and in civil division of the circuit court. The Second District agreed to review the evidence but ultimately affirmed the guardianship court’s decision in the end and gave Mr. Schiavo permission to remove Theresa’s nutrition tubes. However, six days later, under the Legislative enactment, Governor Bush sigh the Act of the Legislative into law and ordered Theresa Schiavo to continue staying on nutrition
…show more content…
Case Facts: Michael and Theresa Schiavo married on November 10, 1984. They were in a happy relationship and had no children. However on February 25, 1990, Theresa Schiavo had a cardiac arrest from potassium imbalance and hasn’t gained consciousness since. Her life was dependent on feeding tubes and constant care. Throughout the years, Michael maintained a good relationship with Theresa’s parents, Robert and Mary Schindler. However their relationship ended when they stopped talking in 1993. On May 1998, Michael requested the guardianship court to allow him to end the life-prolonging procedures that had kept Theresa alive. Mr. and Mrs. Schindler opposed the petition and went through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The first time the case went to court was to resolve the dispute over her neurologic devastation and how her parents and her husband were interpreting her wishes regarding life support. The courts ruled in her husband’s favor, that Terri would not want continued life support and the decision was made to withdraw life sustaining treatment. Her parents appealed the decision to remove treatment and won, because their physicians stated that Terri was not in a permanent vegetative state. Her husband and parents again went to court regarding PVS, and once again her husband was granted the right to remove…

    • 2096 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Cruzan case her family had to convince the courts that she would not want the tube feeding and hydration. They realized this would not cause her and pain and suffering due to her PVS. Here they had to fight with the Missouri courts. In this case they had to show clear and…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schiavo's Case Timeline

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    • October 17, 2001: 2nd District Court of Appeal rules that five physicians can examine Terri to determine if she has any hope of recovery, two of which are picked by Schindlers, two by Michael, and one by court…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It troubled him that the Judge Teel described Nancy’s condition as “unresponsive and hopeless” with “no cognitive purpose for her except sound and perhaps pain.” If Nancy feels pain then she is not in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). We did not know what was going on behind the scenes, but later it would all come to light. Our case bypassed the appellate court of Missouri and headed straight to the Missouri Supreme Court, with a little assistance. Our case was scheduled for review in September, along with a case that has opposite opinions as ours. In other words, the parents of a young man named Phillip Radar, that was diagnosed as being brain dead, did not want to let their child go, but the hospital caring for him did. Phillip’s heart was beating even though he was brain dead. Both of the cases were scheduled to be heard on the same morning in September, but on August 31st Phillip’s heart stopped and the effort to revive him was unsuccessful. His death left our case as the only one to be…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    . The husband of the plaintiff file a petition to the court that his wife[plaintiff] is mentally ill and needs to have a court order directing the admission of her to the mental health hospital. The petition initiated by plaintiff’s husband is the order of the Wayne County probate court, and it is also appropriately certified by Doctors Wolodzko, who after appearing in her house and introducing himself as a doctor , and have a conversation with her in person that day and another day in telephone, determine that she is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and Smyk. The court gave the order and the Plaintiff was taken by ambulance from her home to a private psychiatric hospital.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buck V Bell Case Study

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main person in this case was named Carrie Buck; she was a feebleminded woman who was committed to a state mental institution. She was a resident of the state of Virginia, which in 1924, this same state passed a statute that authorized the superintendants of mental institutions to order the sterilization of people that suffer with hereditary…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While she was in this hospital, a feeding tube was forcibly administered, “In 1986, Bouvia, then 28 years old and suffering from severe cerebral palsy, sought the removal of a nasogastric feeding tube inserted against her will by the medical staff of the High Desert Hospital. Contending that she had a right to refuse any and all medical treatment”(1079, Bouvia v. County of Los Angeles). She did not want the treatment, and had a moral reason to deny it. And not only that, it is within her rights to not have treatment forced upon her. Eventually, she was discharged from the hospital.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A neurological specialist appointed by the court, two selected by Michael Schiavo, and one chosen by the Schindler’s examined Terri for determination of PVS and chance of recovery. Based on the testimonies of all parties and evidence presented in both cases the court decision was that she was in PVS and to cease life support due to her very low chance of recovery from her…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Landmark case law

    • 1824 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S. 261 (1990) was a United States Supreme Court case argued on December 6, 1989 and decided on June 25, 1990. In a 5-4 court decision, the court found in favor of the Missouri Dept. of Health. The court affirmed the ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri. However, it upheld the legal standard that competent persons are able to exercise the right to refuse medical treatment under the Due Process Clause and its implied right to privacy. Because there was no “clear and convincing evidence” of what Nancy Cruzan wanted, the court upheld the state’s policy.…

    • 1824 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barber V Superior Court

    • 637 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion the two petitioners did not legally kill the victim in this case. I believe that the actual act of them removing the life support does not constitute a guilty act. To me it is more of an omission of modern medicine. The doctors had an obligation to help the victim with his health issues, but not a legal responsibility. Once the victim was in a vegetative state they could not do anything to bring him out of the coma, only continue his living in that state and taking care of him. They discussed the issue with the patient’s wife and children and were sure to explain that the chance of recovery was extremely unlikely if at all possible. The family gave the doctors consent to remove the victim from life support that would ultimately end his life. I also don’t see this omission of medical help as euthanasia as they did not induce his death. On the opposite side, if the doctors had given the victim a type of poison against the family’s wishes to keep him on life support, then I would consider that a murder. The facts of the case to me also show that the doctors and nursing staff did everything that they could to keep the victim alive and in…

    • 637 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roe V. Wade Case Study

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “By the turn of the century, all states had laws against abortion, but for the most part they were rarely enforced and women with money had no problem terminating pregnancies if they wished”("Roe v. Wade."). The Roe v. Wade case is about a woman named, Norma McCorvey who is referred to as Jane Roe in this case. She was denied to have an abortion in the state of Texas. She decided to be sneaking and still went to the hospital and tried to have an abortion, but she was caught and got into a big hassle with the court.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Terri Schiavo Case

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On February 28, 1990, twenty six-year old Terri Schiavo suffered severe brain damage when her heart stopped for five minutes. Terri's condition was the subject of intense debate and media scrutiny over the subject of euthanasia and guardianship. Given the circumstances of Terri's vegetated condition, and no physical proof of her wishes, the last word on whether or not Terri would stay alive was given to her husband Michael Schiavo, by the state of Florida. Michael's argument was that he was carrying out her wishes to not be kept alive in that state. Terri's family challenged Michael's claims saying she is responsive and in no discomfort, that her condition does not meet the medical definition of "vegetative," and that she would not wish to die. Although she never wrote a living will expressing a wish to refuse nutrition or medical treatment if disabled, her condition and future life span should have been her family's decision rather then her husbands. Despite of Michael's intentions, the method of starvation as a means of relieving her of her pains and suffering can still be seen as down right unethical as it is immoral. Terri suffered a legal and public murder. Though Mr. Michael Schiavo's intention and objective were presented as selfless, the government had failed to look into other mitigating reasons for his choice.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sue Rodriguez

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sue Rodriguez, once a woman who was lively and healthy women much like the rest of us was given the horrible news that she had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in early 1991 changing her life tremendously. Little did she know her fight for equality of life would create a milestone in Canadian Law. Sue Rodriguez fought long and hard to demand the right to assisted suicide, which at the time was illegal under the Criminal Code of Canada, being a punishable act for up to a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison. Ms. Rodriguez argued that Section 241 (b) of the Criminal Code (which prohibits assisted suicide) violated her constitutional right to life, liberty and security of the person under S. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Unfortunately both the British Columbia Supreme Court and the British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed her application. Sue Rodriguez at her final attempt of trying to grant herself the right to assisted suicide appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, the verdict resulting in a five to four decision with the Supreme Court of Canada dismissing her appeal. In 1994, Ms. Rodriguez decided to take matters into her own hands, with the help of an anonymous physician Sue Rodriguez ended her life.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Buck V. Bell

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dr. Albert Priddy was the superintendent of the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded at Lynchburg he supported the population through the eugenics movement and sterilization. Dr. Priddy had sterilized about 75 to 100 young women without their permission. While doing the sterilization the Virginia legislature did not approved Dr. Priddy to sterilize the women so he had to stop the procedures. But when Dr. Priddy’s friend Aubrey Strode went to talk to the legislature she asked for them to clear the sterilization law. The state had been dealing with budget problems, so since they were in budget problems Dr. Priddy’s colleagues recommended a law that they should be able to sterilize individuals in a condition like that (Buck v. Bell, 2006).…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The sole issue to be determined is whether the Court of Appeals committed grave abuse of discretion in affirming the finding of the ECC that petitioner’s ailment is not compensable under Presidential Decree No. 626, as amended.…

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays