Introduction
To begin with the purpose of this essay will analyze that can the Five Forces model assist Air Asia to analyze low cost strategy effectively. Firstly, the discussion of this essay will explain the model of five forces. Afterwards, in order to make points clearly and demonstrate helpfully, there will be an analysis of a company, which is from airline industry, named Air Asia. In addition, it will analyze the current situations and measures of Air Asia about low cost strategy. Finally, there gives a conclusion that summarizes the aspects analyzed on the essay. This essay aims at analyzing low cost strategy of Air Asia by five forces, to put this model into practice and illustrate its usage and value.
Five Forces
Five forces model had created by Michael Porter in 1979, this is a model analyzes competitive factors and helps managers to determine strategy which is related to profits indirectly. Five forces includes five key areas, they are suppliers bargaining power, buyer bargaining power, potential new entrants, threat of substitute product and the rivalry among competing sellers.(Porter, 1979)
Initially, five forces analyze the opportunity, risk and profitability within a given industry based on five key elements in an objective and neutral way. Secondly, this model is suitable for analyzing general industry, such as a company comes from airline industry, however except non-profit firms. Thirdly, five forces contributes to SWOT model at macro level, it provides the external factors for the aspect of strength. In this essay, it argues that what the most helpful element dedicated to low cost is.
Air Asia
The airlines have brought a significant change to people’s daily life. In specific, it has greatly reduced traveling time and gave a convenience to travel from land to land. Air Asia, comes from Malaysia and established on 12th December 2001, it is a
References: 1. AirAsia (2005) World 's best low-cost airline 4 years running. Kuala Lumpur: AirAsia. Available from: http://www.airasia.com/ask/template.do?id=429 (accessed 12 May 2013). 2. CAPA (2011) AirAsia load factors continue to rise. New Delhi: CAPA. Available from: http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/airasia-load-factors-continue-to-rise-50528 (accessed 12 May 2013). 3. Elliott, M. (2004) AirAsia extends QPR sponsorship. London, Singapore and Bangkok: Travel Daily Media. Available from: http://www.traveldailymedia.com/125827/airasia-extends-qpr-sponsorship (accessed 12 May 2013). 4. Franke, M. (2007) 'Innovation: The winning formula to regain profitability in aviation ', Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(1), pp. 23-30. 5. Hanlon, P.J. (2002) Global airlines: competition in a transnational industry. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. 6. IATA (1996) Airline cost performance. Montreal: IATA. Available from: http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/Documents/economics/IATA_Economic_Briefing_Airline_Cost_Performance_Update.pdf (accessed 12 May 2013). 7. Jainurin, B.J. and Man, K.M. (2005) ' AirAsia in the Malaysian domestic airline market: Empirical analysis of strategy ', International Business & Economics Research Journal, 4(12), pp. 56-57. 8. Krishnamurthy, V.B. (2011) ' Five forces model: Experience from an emerging economy ', The International Journal, 1(4), pp. 5. 9. Kurniawati, R. (2012) Tourism Marketing: The example of AirAsia. Tangerang: Indotourismweb. Available from: http://rinakurniawati.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/ tourism-marketing-the-example-of-airasia/ (accessed 12 May 2013). 10. Porter, M. (1979) How competitive forces shape strategy. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press. 11. Ricart, E.J. and Wang, D. (2005) ' Now everyone can fly Air Asia ', Asian Journal of Management Cases, 2(2), pp. 232. 12. Taneja, N. (2004) Simpli-flying: Optimizing the Airline Business Model. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. 13. Teichert, T., Shehu, E., and Wartburg, I. (2008) ' Customer segmentation revisited: The case of the airline industry ', Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(1), pp. 78-83.