Business Ethics Case Study: Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company
Name
Professor
Subject
Date
Crisis at Komfy
Topic: Ethics
Purpose Statement: To determine possible cause of action at Komfy
Introduction
Ethics considers the best possible way in which people cohabit and live. It also determines which actions are right or wrong depending on the situation at hand. In corporate practice, ethics defines the moral practice of the owners, employees, as well as the society at large (Bloomfield, 54). Chris Kross in his capacity as the chief engineer at Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company is duty bound by the ethics code to do what is ethically correct for the well-being of the company. However, he must keep in mind the good of the society in which Frazier Chemical Incorporated company operates.
Frazier Chemical …show more content…
Stockholder theory in collaboration with utilitarianism presents him with the first possible cause of action. Interests of the company come first in his priorities. He should also apply normative ethics. This implies that his moral action should maximize the economic well-being of the company.
Moreover, Kris should consider the nature of his freedom and the degree of his individual rights. Consideration of his rights and freedom gives him social and legal framework to operate on in his undertaking of the duties and responsibilities bestowed upon him by Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company. Justice theory, on the other hand, prescribes that whatever cause of action undertaken should consider the best interest of those involved. The society, the government, employees of Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company, as well as the EPA official 's interest, should be looked into before Kris decides on which is the best solution to the problem at …show more content…
The test will help him analyze his actions and the perceptions it will pass across to the members of the public. It is an honorable thing to be reasonable since it will enable Kris to make a conscious decision on what cause of action is most appropriate to undertake given his position and the situation at hand. Suppose the truth about the long-term effect of the effluent being discharged into Komfy Lake is exposed, would he be guilty and uncomfortable? Consideration of this question will make him determine his stand. If he is uncomfortable, the best alternative measure is to stop the activities of the company as far as his capacity is
Professor
Subject
Date
Crisis at Komfy
Topic: Ethics
Purpose Statement: To determine possible cause of action at Komfy
Introduction
Ethics considers the best possible way in which people cohabit and live. It also determines which actions are right or wrong depending on the situation at hand. In corporate practice, ethics defines the moral practice of the owners, employees, as well as the society at large (Bloomfield, 54). Chris Kross in his capacity as the chief engineer at Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company is duty bound by the ethics code to do what is ethically correct for the well-being of the company. However, he must keep in mind the good of the society in which Frazier Chemical Incorporated company operates.
Frazier Chemical …show more content…
Stockholder theory in collaboration with utilitarianism presents him with the first possible cause of action. Interests of the company come first in his priorities. He should also apply normative ethics. This implies that his moral action should maximize the economic well-being of the company.
Moreover, Kris should consider the nature of his freedom and the degree of his individual rights. Consideration of his rights and freedom gives him social and legal framework to operate on in his undertaking of the duties and responsibilities bestowed upon him by Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company. Justice theory, on the other hand, prescribes that whatever cause of action undertaken should consider the best interest of those involved. The society, the government, employees of Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company, as well as the EPA official 's interest, should be looked into before Kris decides on which is the best solution to the problem at …show more content…
The test will help him analyze his actions and the perceptions it will pass across to the members of the public. It is an honorable thing to be reasonable since it will enable Kris to make a conscious decision on what cause of action is most appropriate to undertake given his position and the situation at hand. Suppose the truth about the long-term effect of the effluent being discharged into Komfy Lake is exposed, would he be guilty and uncomfortable? Consideration of this question will make him determine his stand. If he is uncomfortable, the best alternative measure is to stop the activities of the company as far as his capacity is