Preview

Business Ethics- Profit vs. Csr

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Ethics- Profit vs. Csr
In today’s globalised world where free market economies are the driving force behind companies constant pursuit of maximisation of profits, there seems to be a clear deficit of social values and commitment to serving society. This essay will turn the light on how business organisations’ ultimate aim is to generate profits and CSR activities are secondary if not often ignored. The essay takes the position that CSR initiatives are recently being acknowledged as not only beneficial to society but equally beneficial to business over the long term. The lure of quick profits has now demonstrably hurt the credibility of big businesses with disastrous consequences for business as well as society. In short, business goals must increasingly view the interest of all stakeholders as equally important if society’s faith in market capitalism is not to be completely forfeited. Hence in this essay I will argue in favour of CSR initiatives and how companies today cannot survive without fulfilling certain obligations they have towards society.
Now, let’s begin by understanding the point of view of renowned American economist Milton Friedman, he believed that maximization of profit is the key drivers or fundamental premises in a free market economy and that corporate executives were employees of the owners of the business and that their social responsibility is towards the shareholders of the company and maximizing shareholders value. In short, he argued that the social responsibility of any business was to generate profits as more profits would lead to higher dividends or capital appreciation.
(Milton Friedman, The New York Times Magazine, 13th September, 1970 )
Let’s take a look at one of the largest cases of bankruptcy that sparked off the worst financial crisis in America and world over. The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy case brought the entire world to a standstill, the company dragged the entire world into a financial crisis with over 26000 employees losing jobs and



Bibliography: • http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp-business.html • http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57417397/the-case-against-lehman-brothers/ • http://www.forbes.com/sites/csr/2012/02/21/six-reasons-companies-should-embrace-csr/ • http://ebeni.wordpress.com/decisions/theories/consequences/utiliarianism/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bus 351 Research Paper

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Renowned author Milton Friedman stated that: “The business of business is business”. He believes that society’s interests are in direct contrast to corporate management’s ideologies. In an attempt to promote their own causes and still enlist the support of society, organizations have implemented Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). This concept proves to be a disillusioned attempt by companies that claim to already be practicing CSR, to satisfy campaign groups that insist that they need to do more to mitigate their social issues. As other countries in the world, especially Continental and Central Europe are moving toward the Anglo-Saxon shareholder value model; many debates arise and prove to have global…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milton Friedman argued that a business’s only goal is to generate shareholder profit. This is stated in the very title of a New York Times article written by Milton Friedman, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”. This statement would no doubt start a myriad of discussions with in the business world. Why would Friedman take this type of right wing stand? Shouldn’t a company consider social issues in their everyday business as well?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thirty-five years ago, Milton Friedman wrote a famous article for The New York Times Magazine whose title aptly summed up its main point: "The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." Friedman had no patience for capitalists who claimed that "business is not concerned 'merely' with profit but also with promoting desirable 'social' ends; that business has a 'social conscience' and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers." Friedman wrote that such people are "preaching pure and unadulterated socialism. Businessmen who talk this way are unwitting puppets of the intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades."…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    guide reading

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friedman argues that the objective of a corporation is to maximize the profits within the guidelines of the law in the free and open society. If the corporate executive has a “social responsibility”, which means his is to act that is not in the interest of his employers.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Ethics 101 Week 1

    • 4442 Words
    • 18 Pages

    • ‘The one and only social responsibility of business is to make profits’ (the economics guru Milton Friedman)…

    • 4442 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business ethics and CSR

    • 3366 Words
    • 14 Pages

    In the past time, the majority of enterprises regarded business ethics as internal regulations to comply with the rules of legal standards(Trevino and Nelson, 2010). However, the condition changes in modern times. Business ethics is more and more important to identify what it is right or wrong during the process of working or trading and so on(Wheelen and Hunger, 2011), which is closely related to the interests of stakeholders. Under the background, many companies recognize that they have to obtain more respect and trust of their consumers so as to be successful. As result, organizations pay increasing attention to their behaviors and corporate social responsibility (CSR) become a business principle for marketing behaviors with the increased public awareness about the role of enterprises in assisting to promote and practice business ethics in society and environment. in order to have a better understanding of business ethics and CSR, this report is going to logically identify business ethics and critically assessing its effect on an organization, identifying CSR and analyzing the lessons of the News Corporation scandal and the importance of CSR and then discussing the leadership during the process of promoting business ethics and CSR.…

    • 3366 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article by Milton Friedman titled the social responsibility of business is to increase profits and the speech given by bill gates at the world economic forum 2008 both address the nagging topic of social responsibility of corporations. Both articles offer tremendous insight on this issue. Friedman points out the contradiction of the notion of social responsibility and the aim of making profit while gates introduces Recognition as a new variable in this equation. The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast both articles.I am going to discuss Friedman's article first. Friedman raises the issue of social responsibility as a contradiction to the sole purpose of a corporation which is make profit. Firstly he points out a corporation is an artificial entity which should also have artificial responsibility in essence it is not a person and only persons can be held socially responsible. Who then do we hold responsible? Perhaps the corporate executive but here another issue arises he has direct responsibility to his employers and not the society and has to conduct business according to their desires this is his primary duty. Friedman argues that the corporation spending money towards a chosen cause is in a way imposing taxes and also deciding how the taxes shall be spent. How does one choose which cause to cater to? He argues that the imposition of taxes and expenditure of tax proceeds are governmental functions. The whole purpose of the corporation of serving the interest of its stockholders is defeated when these taxes are imposed and the proceeds spent for social purpose.However Friedman then points out that though the practice of social responsibility may contradict with the corporations purpose to make money it is justifiable in the long run on other grounds which are often not a reason for the action in the first place. benefits may include such as making it easier to attract desirable employees, it may reduce wage bill or lessen losses from pilferage…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘Narrow View’ argues that profit maximisation is the only objective for a business. Levitt.T wrote, “In the end business has only two responsibilities- to obey the elementary canons of face-to-face civility (honesty, good faith and so on) and to seek material gain”. Milton Friedman argued that business has no social responsibilities other than to maximise profit. Friedman also argues that the corporation is an artificial person and can, therefore, only have "artificial responsibilities." "Business" is apparently an even more artificial construct and therefore we are left with just proprietors and corporate executives who can actually be responsible. Because the function of business organisation is to make money, the owners of corporations employ executives to accomplish the goals, thus managers are obliged to act in the interest of owners. According to Friedman, executives have social corporate responsibilities beyond pursuit of profit. They must spend shareholder money for general social interest such as taxing the owners and spending taxes on social causes.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is obvious to many that the goal of a company is to make a profit. According to Milton Friedman, what many businesses do not say is that this is their only responsibility and that it is to make the highest profit possible. As members of society, we should be concerned that these decisions will have affect us. I believe that a business has the responsibility to make a profit, but it has many others as well. A business not only has to make a profit but think about the long term affects such as their employees and other stakeholders. Throughout this paper there will be many views that Friedman may not have been thought about before. To begin, I will describe why Friedman the writer of “Social Responsibility of a Business is to Make a Profit” had a off set view on business, followed by a better representation of the social responsibility of a business as a whole.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mine

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Critics argue that Corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing; others argue that it is an attempt to…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milton Friedman

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Milton Friedman takes the position that corporations cannot be socially responsible, only people can have responsibilities. In continuing with this thought, he then suggest that social responsibility is then directed at the corporate executive of a business, not the business as a whole. The corporate executive has primary responsibility to his employers to conduct business as they see fit, and manage the business to create the most profit while following the “basic rules of society”.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tinged Shareholder Theory

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Martin Friedman believes that businesses do not have any moral obligations or social responsibilities at all, other than to maximize their own profit. This view is called “Shareholder Theory”. Friedman argued that a company should have no social responsibility to the public or society because it’s only concern is to increase profits for itself and for its shareholders. He states that, when companies concern themselves with the community rather than focusing on profits, it leads to totalitarianism.…

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    nvnvn

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Friedman argued that a company should have no social responsibility to the public or society because its only concern is to increase profits for itself and for its shareholders. He states that when companies concern themselves with the community rather than focusing on profits, it leads to totalitarianism. A corporation is an artificial person and therefore cannot be socially responsible.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Responsibility

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Managers’ primary responsibilities is to serve the interests of the stockholders doing ‘social good’ adds to the cost of doing business costs have to be passed on to consumers…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays