The essay is based on individual perspectives with reflective elements, which are also based on pieces of psychology papers.
Group forming and development as well as individual contribution is highly involved in the Business game module.
Going through different stages of the module, i.e. from the very start of the group forming until the end of individual essay, the group started to grow gradually although there are occasions where problem occurred.
The development of the teamwork is incorporated in the course of doing each piece of course work, i.e. there is progress of teamwork overall in this module.
Different psychology theories or model are outlined when needed for reference.
Personally, there is also some feedback for this module, e.g. the disclosure of software failure, and inconsistency of the assessment method, the lack of background knowledge of motor car industry, etc.
Content
Executive summary...................................................................................2
Introduction...............................................................................................4
The company presentation.........................................................................5
The business plan......................................................................................7
The Practical game....................................................................................10
The company report...................................................................................11
The module................................................................................................13
Conclusion..................................................................................................15
Reference....................................................................................................16
Introduction
I will regard this essay as one with more personal
References: Robbins, S.P. and Judge, T.A. (2007). Organizational Behavior. 12. ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Tuckman, B.W. and Jensen, M.A. (1977). Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited. Journal of Management. 2, Issue 4, pp.419-427. Tuckman, B.W. (1965) Development Sequence in Small Groups. Pschology Bulletin, 63, issue 3, pp.384-399 Margerison, C Herzberg, F. (1966) Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland: World Press Digman, J.M Goldberg, L. (1990). An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59, Issue 6, pp.1216-1229. Robbins, S.P. and Judge, T.A. (2007). Organizational Behavior. 12. ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Robbins, S.P Podsakoff, P.M. and Schriesheim, C.A. (1985). Field Studies of French and Raven 's Bases of Power: Critique, Reanalysis, and Suggestions for Future Research. Psychological Bulletin. 97, Issue 3, pp.387-411. Barling, J., Loughlin, C. and Kelloway, E.K. (2002). Development and Test of a Model Linking Safety-Specific Transformational Leadership and Occupational Safety. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87, Issue 3, pp.488-496. Bass, B.M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics. 18, Issue 3, pp.19-31. Likert, R. (1961) New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill. French, J.R.P. and Raven, B. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In: Cartwright, D., (ed). Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan:Institute for Social Research, pp150-167.