Preview

Business Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2996 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law
Business Law & Bankruptcy
Assignment #4
Aquaman is president of a marine research company called Underwater Leagues, Inc. When his company conceived a dramatic new invention, he held off announcing the discovery until he bought 50,000 shares of Underwater Leagues at $10 per share. After the announcement, the share price skyrocketed to $50 per share.
The shareholders of Underwater Leagues, Inc. bring a derivative action suit against Aquaman claiming breach of fiduciary duty for violating 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act of 1934 by purchasing stock in his company on the basis of information that was not available to the public. The shareholders seek remedy for their claim.
If a president of a corporation purchases stock in his company on the basis of non-public information that he deliberately withheld from the public, is he in violation of 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act of 1934, and will he be held liable to shareholders for damages?
In Robert Kemp v. Universal American Financial Corporation, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P94,147 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) an action is brought on behalf of those who purchased the securities of Universal American Financial Corporation (Universal) during the Class Period. Plaintiffs allege that Universal, a health and life insurance company, issued false and misleading statements regarding the financial performance of its senior health care segment, and allowed insiders to sell their privately held shares while the shares were artificially inflated. As a result, plaintiffs purchased inflated common stock that dropped in value after the company announced a decline in net income.
Richard A. Barasch, Universal’s Chairman, President, and CEO, sold 160,000 shares of his personally owned stock at an artificially inflated price for gross proceeds of $3.24 million, Robert A. Waegelein, Universal’s Executive Vice President and CFO, sold 60,000 shares for gross proceeds of $1.37 million, Gary W.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: The plaintiff, Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC, presented a securities fraud class action against the defendant, Charter Communications’ vendors, Scientific-Atlanta. Charter communications is a publicly traded cable company that services millions of customers throughout America. Charter contracts with vendors for equipment that is used for their company. Charter had Scientific-Atlanta sell set-top cable boxes at a higher price than the normal selling price. Scientific-Atlanta also sold advertisement at a rate four to five times higher than normal rates. These abnormally increased rates caused inflation in Charter’s stock price. Stoneridge Investment Partners also claimed that Charter Communications wanted Scientific-Atlanta to purchase advertising on its networks just to enhance their revenue. Stoneridge Investment Partners sued both Charter and Scientific-Atlanta under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The claims against all other defendants other than Scientific-Atlanta were resolved. The District Court had to decide whether or not Scientific-Atlanta was a primary violator of the relevant statutes.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Bezirdjian v. O’Reilly, the plaintiff (Bezirdjian) files a shareholder derivative complaint on behalf of Chevron Corporation citing that current and certain former member of Board of Directors (BOD) breached fiduciary duties, grossly managed the corporation, were involved in constructive fraud, and wasted corporate assets “in connection with illicit payments Chevron allegedly made to Saddam Hussein in exchange for Iraqi oil from 2000 to 2003.” Bezirdjian has a legal right to bring an action against the alleged party because he believes that harm has been done to Chevron in connection to illicit payments made to Saddam Hussein but the corporation itself has not taken any action against the offenders.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Scott entered into a unilateral contract with Hume. Scott used the large signboard to offer $1000 to the ballplayer who hit a homerun over the sign. This is a promise for an act. Hume completed the performance of the act by hitting the homerun over the sign and therefore the unilateral contract between them was formed.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. State whether the following provisions in a note impair or preclude negotiability, the instrument in each instance being otherwise in proper form. Answer each statement with either “Negotiable” or Nonnegotiable” and explain why.…

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Under the Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose, what two things must a seller know about a buyer? 280…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) Is Bright entitled to specific performance because of the unique nature of the goods?…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sarbanes Oxley Act o

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The American government has taken significant measures to protect the public from fraud with-in corporations. Many federal laws have been enacted, regulatory bodies created and empowered to monitor and enforce those laws. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (SOX), of 2002 was an attempt to address several violations to the public trust from corporations that continued to occur despite the previous attempts to govern corporate responsibility to the public. This act specifically tried to reduce unethical corporate behavior and increase public confidence in the financial reporting of corporations (Kimmel, Weygandt, & Kieso, 2011). This paper will address if the requirements of SOX will be enough to prevent future fraud in the corporate environment.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Following the SEC’s inability to control Wall Street fraud, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission received sharp criticism from the public for its seemingly weak enforcement of Wall Street’s too big to fail banks. Many believe that the agency is unethically protecting Wall Street fraud due to the incident in 2010 when the National Archives had contacted the SEC expressing concern that an unauthorized destruction of federal records had…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. I’m convinced that Martha Stewart did commit the crime of insider trading, on December 27, 2001. Looking at the events leading to her decision to liquidate her shares in ImClone, it is evident that she was in possession of material information that was not available to the public yet. The fact that her Financial Advisor, Mr. Bacanovic had instructed Faneuil to call Martha Stewart and let her know of the selling frenzy that was going on with the Waksal’s, which suggests that Peter Bacanovic was in possession of insider information about ImClone company, which he shared with Martha and advised her to sell her shares before the stock plummets proves that, Stewart was aware of upcoming changes effecting ImClone stock beforehand. Another incident that suggests Martha Stewart’s quilt is the fact that when Peter Bacanovic asked Faneuil to call Martha and break the news to her, Faneuil hesitated asking Peter whether or not it was permitted to share that sort of sensitive information, with another client. Merrill Lynch’s Privacy Policy prohibits the release of client information, except upon client’s…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages

    John Thomas is the sole owner of the masonry company named Concrete 123, and is the only employee. Concrete 123’s area of business is based in Sacramento California, in Sacramento County. Thomas has the appropriate licenses and experience to conduct the work and has been self employed as a concrete installer for approximately seven (7)…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If the representation will result in violation of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct or other law, the lawyer's physical or mental condition materially impairs the lawyer's ability to represent the client, or the lawyer is discharged.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Determine who was in violation or compliance of the AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct in this case study and analyze the key reasons why they were or were not in compliance. Provide support for the rationale.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Adelphia Scandal

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Securities and Exchange Commission. (2002, July 24). Retrieved September 25, 2013, from Securities and Exchange Commission Web site: http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr17627.htm…

    • 2336 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inside Trading

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this case number (2012-255) concerning Insider Trading Ring Investment Banker Illegal Tips on Impending Merger on Dec 5, 2012. The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an investment banker who was primarily based in Charlotte, N.C., and nine others involved in an insider trading ring that garnered more than $11 million in illicit profits trading on confidential information about impending mergers (SEC, 2012). John W. Femenia misused his position at Wells Fargo Securities to obtain material, nonpublic information about four separate merger transactions involving firm clients (SEC, 2012). Upon learning inside information about an impending deal, Femenia’s first call to set the insider trading ring in motion was typically to his longtime friend Shawn C. Hegedus, who worked as a registered broker (SEC, 2012). Femenia and Hegedus illegally tipped other friends who in turn tipped more friends or family members in a ring that spread across five states (SEC, 2012). This case related to the one from text reading because he had confidential information that he used to make a profit for himself and if the stockholders as well as partner are not given this information it can’t be legally used. In an important legal case, U.S. vs. O’Hagen, the Supreme Court clarified insider trad- ing law (Lawrence, A.T. and Weber, J. 2011). The court ruled that someone who traded on the basis of inside information when he or she knew the information was supposed to remain confidential was guilty of misappropriation, whether or not the trader was directly connected to the company whose shares were purchased (Lawrence, A.T. and Weber, J. 2011).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case about 200 customers of Potter's business were not notified of the termination of the agency and Aker who had been a sales agent for Potter for twenty years was also fired along with the termination of the company.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays