Preview

Business Law Lecture Week 4

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law Lecture Week 4
HI 5018
BUSINESS LAW

Week 4

Application of Negligence to Business

Chapter 9
Applications of Negligence to
Business

Chapter objectives
On completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
 identify and discuss the application of

the tort of negligence to the following:
a) occupier’s liability
b)strict liability
c) negligent misstatements
d)employer or vicarious liability
e) breach of statutory duty
f) criminal negligence
HI 5018 BUSINESS LAW T2 2014

3

3

1

Chapter objectives

On completion of this chapter, you should be able to:
 explain how a bailment arises
 describe the duties of a bailor and a bailee

HI 5018 BUSINESS LAW T2 2014

4

4

Occupier’s Liability

Occupier’s Liability
Occupiers must take reasonable care and owe a common law duty of care to ensure that anyone (even a trespasser) who comes onto those premises is not injured:
Hackshaw v Shaw (1984)

HI 5018 BUSINESS LAW T2 2014

5

5

Occupier’s Liability

Who is an occupier?
An occupier is any person who has occupation or control, whether it is partial or whole, of land or a structure standing on the land:
Consolidated Broken Hill Ltd v Edwards [2005]

HI 5018 BUSINESS LAW T2 2014

6

6

2

Occupier’s Liability
 This tort is now part of negligence:

Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v
Zaluzna (1986)

 Occupiers owe a duty of care to

entrants; that is, to take reasonable care to ensure they do not suffer injury on the premises.

 Where the risk is obvious, the duty

will be minimal.

HI 5018 BUSINESS LAW T2 2014

7

7

Occupier’s Liability

To establish occupier’s liability, a plaintiff must prove:
 The defendant has occupation or

control of the land or structure; and

 The defendant was negligent,— that

is, there was a duty of care owed that was breached and damage was sustained by the plaintiff.

HI 5018 BUSINESS LAW T2 2014

8

8

Occupier’s Liability

The test for determining what the occupier must do to discharge their duty of care:
 is the risk real and
 what would a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch11-15

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dorris Reed, the plaintiff, purchased a home from Robert King. Robert King and his real estate agent did not tell Dorris Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered 10 years ago, because the murder would affect the value of the home. Dorris Reed, however, did find out about the murder from a neighbor and sued Robert King and his real estate agent for rescission and damages. Dorris Reed paid $76,000 for the home but the value of the house, once the murder was taken into consideration, was only worth $65,000. Due to Dorris Reed failing to state a cause of action, the trial court sided with Robert King and his real estate agent. Dorris Reed appealed. Fraud is being looked at in the case of Reed vs. King. There are five elements to proving fraud, 1) material misrepresentation, 2) facts/knowledge, 3) intent, 4) reliance, and 5) damage (quoted from text book). Robert King and his real estate agent hid the first and second element of fraud. They knew about the murders and did not present Dorris Reed with this information, which would have affected Dorris Reed decision to buy the house. However, when dealing with the selling of real property, the question of materially is the main issue. Materiality is based on three conditions, 1) the gravity of the harm inflicted by nondisclosure, 2) the fairness of imposing a duty of discovery on the buyer as an alternative to compelling disclosure, and 3) the impact on the stability of contracts if rescission is permitted (citation from text book). Even though murder is horrible and it would affect a person’s judgment on buying that particulate house, there is no evidence to support Dorris Reed claim that the murder would in fact affect the market value of the house. The judgment was later reversed because Dorris Reed was able to present enough evidence to show that history can affect the value of property.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law Ch 4

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    17-3. Daniel is not liable for the debt Rubya defaulted on. The contract did not make Rubya a partner, even those she was given profit sharing and management responsibilities, she did not poses any ownership of the business. Also under UPA 202(c)(3) no presumption of partnership is made since the profits are wages of an employee or for the services of an independent contractor. Not to mention Daniel did not have any knowledge of the credit extended to Rubya.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under these facts, Adam can be found personally liable for the loss even though there is a legal principle, which affords him a degree of protection. The text explains that “the liability of a limited partner, as mentioned, is limited to the capital that she or he contributes or agrees to contribute to the partnership [RULPA 502]. Limited partners enjoy this limited liability only so long as they do not participate in management {RULPA 303]” (Miller, 3-5b).…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Final Essay

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When asked “what can Moon, Inc do to get its money from Bob Zimmerman?” I would address it by saying if Zimmerman doesn’t pay off what he owes then according to the mortgage contract Zimmerman would foreclose his house and Moon, Inc. would have the right to bid first. My reasoning is that initially the mortgage was taken out for the house and Zimmerman paid back loans toward the bank. If Zimmerman doesn’t pay then the house is foreclosed and the bank gets the right to bid first on credit bid. Now the mortgage for the house belongs to Moon, Inc. and Zimmerman pays back loans to Moon, Inc. Since Zimmerman has stopped paying his mortgage that means that when the house gets foreclosed Moon, Inc. would have the right to bid first on credit bid.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alex would be suing Betty for a breach of contract. He would only succeed if he’s able to prove that a contract was in place. A contract can be defined as “a written or spoken agreement that is intended to be enforceable by law.” In order for it to be formed, agreement must take place and it can be broken down into two elements. Firstly, an offer. This can be described as an expression of willingness to contract on clear terms, with the intention that it will become a binding contract when it has been accepted. The second is acceptance, which can be defined as the unqualified expression of assent to the terms of an offer.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Chapter 5 6

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No, Emerson is not liable. Emerson clearly stated that children should be kept away. In the owner’s…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What methods of ADR are available to pursue? Which of these ADR methods do you think is the most appropriate? Explain your answer.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Tort Claim the neighbor has is negligence and product liability. The possible defendants are Mary, the manufacturer, the distributer, the wholesaler, and the retailer. The neighbor would sue Mary for negligence because Mary should have never taken off the guard. And the neighbor would sue the manufacturer, the distributer, the wholesaler, and the retailer for product liability because during anytime during the exchange of product anyone could have put a warning on the guard warning of the dangers.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law Ch 5 Hw

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. Assume that the state of Ohio passed a hazardous waste statute, seeking to protect the general public and workers. The state statute did not violate the Commerce Clause because it imposed no restriction on interstate commerce. Both the state statute and the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) established job safety standards and specified worker training and employer licensing, but the requirements differed. Which statute(s) Ohio corporations had to obey? Pick the best ANALYSISwer.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Week 5

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our team learned this week how to differentiate between types of discriminatory issues and knowing the legal considerations linked to it. This knowledge proved to be beneficial in the team’s decision on how to tackle option one of this week’s team reflection exercise. As a senior manager of a prominent security company, it is important that I look out for the company’s integrity in maintaining its mission of maintaining order, protecting property and the use of deadly force. One of our employees, Joe who recently returned from a successful two years boots in ground deployment in Afghanistan is suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). His mental health provider made this diagnosis along with depression, anxiety, and anger issues. As the senior person in-charge of Joe, I have to make a tough decision whether to recommend if Joe should remain in or resign from the company.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence law states that a person or an organization is generally liable when they negligently injure others.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS LAW QUESTIONS

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. A state's constitution can't conflict with the U.S. Constitution or a federal law.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays