Preview

BWVW 102 Study Guide 2

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1775 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BWVW 102 Study Guide 2
Biblical Worldview: Study Guide #2
1. Know the following court cases.
A. Roe V. Wade (January 22nd, 1973)
Situation: Jane Roe (Norma Mc Corvey)
Main Ruling: Lifted bans on abortion in all 50 states. A woman’s “ right to privacy” extends to her liberty to terminate an unwanted pregnancy

Also: The unborn are not “ persons” and thus ineligible for constitutional protection.

B. Doe V. Bolton (January 22nd, 1973)

Main Ruling- It expanded the definition of the “ health: of the mother to include financial and psychological issues etc. as determined by her physician.

C. Eisenstaedt V. Baird (Decided March 22nd 1972)
Massachusetts law made it a felony for anyone to give away a drug, medicine, instrument, or article for the prevention of conception except in the case of
A registered physician administering or prescribing it for a married person or
An active registered pharmacist furnishing it to a married person presenting a registered physician's prescription.
Appellee William Baird was convicted under this law first, for exhibiting contraceptive articles in the course of delivering a lecture on contraception to a group of students at Boston University and, second, for giving a young woman a package of Emko vaginal foam at the close of his address. Baird challenged the law as conflicting "with fundamental human rights" under Griswold v. Connecticut.
The Supreme Court agreed, ruling it was unconstitutional to treat married and unmarried people differently regarding contraception. The Court said the right to privacy belongs not to the married couple but to the individual person, and prevents government interference with "matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child.

D. Cruzan V. Missouri (January 11th, 1983)
Nancy was involved in a car accident, which ultimately left her in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). She did not require a respirator like Karen but she did receive all foods and fluids through a feeding tube.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A prescription can be identified as legally authorised written instruction by a prescribing officer to a pharmacist to dispense medication.…

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leesa Limir Case Memoir

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dr Mcbain and Leesa Meldrum had the contention that single women should be allowed access to IVF treatment whether or not they are married or single. However the Victorian state law had the opposing view of not allowing IVF to single women or those that are in a “de facto” relationship. The laws that existed at the time of the case were S8 of the infertility treatment act in Victoria and S22 of the Commonwealth sex discrimination act 1984. These laws impacted on Leesa Meldrum as she was unable to receive IVF due to the inconsistency of the Victorian and Commonwealth laws. John Mcbain took the case to court in order to justify the commonwealth law and allow it to be followed regarding S109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution act 1990 which states that if there is any conflict between state and commonwealth laws in an area of concurrent power, commonwealth law must prevail. The state of Victoria had opposing views on this case as they believed that IVF may only be given to a woman who is married of ‘living in a de facto relationship’. Therefore lesbians, single and divorced women are excluded from…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The case involved 72-year-old Barronelle Stutzman, who denied services for the wedding of same-sex couple [insert names here] in 2012. Stutzman had served the couple previously, but said she could not provide services for the wedding out of concern that doing so would cause her to participate in the ceremony which is against her religious conscience.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Justices disagreed, creating four contradicting opinion. Many of the supreme court justices disagreed with the majority stated that same-sex couples had the right to wed. All justices concurred that the Constitution itself does not say anything in regards to marriage. This implies marriage is not a counted right. Indeed, Justice Alito particularly stated, "The Constitution says nothing in regards to same-sex marriage." Because the privilege for same-sex couples to wed is not an identified right, the only way for it to be protected in our constitution is for it to be inferred. The justices stated that…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Persistent vegetative state is a specific clinical diagnosis for a patient who is permanently unconscious. All thought, all memory, all ability to interact with the world around them in any way is gone" (LLP). William H. Colby who argued the case for Nancy and her family stated this in his opening statement during the hearing. His petitioners included Nancy herself, and her family and friends. (LLP) Nancy Beth Cruzan was involved in a serious automobile accident in 1983, which left her in a vegetative state. Her life was sustained for a few weeks before the question came to, how do we maintain life? With no interaction with the outside world, and no signs of getting better, Cruzan's parents attempted to end her nutrition and hydration tube.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They wanted to appeal because they believed that the people’s rights were being infringed upon. The Supreme Court found that Connecticut law violated the “right to marital privacy” (McBride, 2007). The First Amendment has a penumbra where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). The Fourth and Fifth Amendments are described as protection against all governmental invasions "of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life” (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). Planned Parenthood asserted, “the state cannot dictate to husbands and wives what they may and may not do in their marital relations” (Stein, 2010, p. 100). The Supreme Courts stated that the state of Connecticut has to prove to the Courts that its law is "compelling" and "absolutely necessary" in order for the Supreme Court to overcome that right (Griswold v Connecticut, 1965). Griswold was the a pro-marriage ruling and given the fact it was a case involving marriage and sex law, the decision strengthened the supremacy of heteronormative sexual expression (Stein, 2010, p. 29). The Oxford Dictionary defines heteronormative as Denoting or relating to a worldview that promotes heterosexuality as the normal or preferred sexual orientation (Oxford, 2015). With the Supreme Court ruling it provided married couples with privacy. The lawyer in the case of Griswold v. Connecticut mentioned, “Would we allow the police to search the sacred precincts of marital bedrooms for telltale signs of the use of contraceptives? The very idea is repulsive to the notions of privacy surrounding the marriage relationship” (Stein, 2010, p. 30). This helped set the groundwork for when other cases were brought up to the courts. Why is this court important to changing of urban sexualities in the 1960s? It is important because it provided women with the right to decide if they wanted to take contraceptive with worrying…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roe Vs Wade Summary

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Deciding whether the abortion laws should be upheld and enforced in Texas or if they should be repealed was an important decision that the Supreme Court had to make in the Roe vs Wade case. Roe, whose real name was Norma McCorvey was a pregnant women that lived in Texas in the early 1970’s. She wanted to get an abortion so she said she got raped since that was the only way she would be able to get an abortion. She wasn’t allowed to get one since their was no police report about the rape. She thought that the abortion laws in Texas criminalized abortions after she couldn’t have a legal abortion. When the case was finally decided upon the social impact created a lot of change. Because of Roe vs Wade abortions were changed for the better.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paralegals may practise in all areas of law that lawyers do provided they are licensed…

    • 1357 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roe v. Wade research paper

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Coffee and Weddington went off the argument that, "A woman is guaranteed the right to an abortion by her constitutional right to privacy. No state could interfere with a woman's decision to have an abortion which was a private matter." (Herda, 31) They based this on the first, fourth, fifth, eighth, ninth…

    • 2154 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -Griswold disagree with the Connecticut state law which tells people about contraception. He thinks that telling people about contraception(kind of privacy) is unconstitutional.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The justices acted in accordance with the constitution because the contraceptive coverage was going against the Church’s religious…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Federal law states: It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to possess a controlled substance unless such substance was obtained directly, or pursuant to a valid prescription or order, from a practitioner, while acting in the course of his professional practice, or except as otherwise authorized by this subchapter or subchapter II of this chapter.…

    • 627 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Medicines prescribed to a person are that person’s property and may not be used by any other person.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eugenics Pros And Cons

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This decision would eventually be overturned but it took fifteen years to get the law changed. The law was overturned because of the case Skinner v. Oklahoma. This case was overturned on the grounds that the latter violated the basic civil rights of Carrie Buck to procreate if she chose to do so. Even though this decision was eventually overturned, Carrie Buck along with thousands of other feebleminded Americans was victims of this senseless crime that was brought on by our own society and our own court…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays