Preview

By Appeal of Book V (Plato's Republic)

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
By Appeal of Book V (Plato's Republic)
In Book V of The Republic Plato (427d-449a) Plato states that the city is the best and in order for it to be the best the virtues of wisdom, courage, moderation and justice have to be plain to see. Also in Book V Plato describes how justice of an individual is similar to justice in the city. The explanations of Plato’s position on the location of the virtues, how they are parts of the soul, how justice is similar to justice in the soul and how Plato connects justice with unity and happiness such that Glaucon agrees with him that a person living a just life will reap the benefit of that lifestyle opposed to living unjust in this essay are given to make Book V (427d-449a) much clearer.

By appeal to part V of Plato’s the republic there are a few positions that he has based on the location of the qualities of wisdom, courage, discipline and justice in the state. The first of these qualities, wisdom is located within the guardians and it’s the first thing Plato sees in the city. First off, he finds the city to be wise because of its respectable judgment which is looked upon as some category of knowledge called guardianship and only the guardians possess this kind of knowledge. Furthermore, Plato goes on to explain that a whole city established would be wise because of the least numerous class, which would be seen as the governing or ruling class, and their virtue. Since they are the ruling class their personal virtues are reflected through the city which in turn makes the city wise (428b). The second quality, courage, is located in the auxiliary class of the city. Plato believes that if you are to determine whether a city has courage, the best part to look for it would be in the soldiers. He also believes that courage is a type of preservation for the law. No matter the pain, pleasure, desire or fear the guardians will never abandon the belief that has been inculcated by the law (429b). The third quality of moderation is located all throughout the city. He



Bibliography: Plato. Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub Co, 1992.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was an interesting individual, and has always been one of my favorite Philosophers. I personally like most of his political ideals, and find them almost in alignment with my own. In particular I like his reasoning when it comes to the citizens that make up the city-state, along with the leadership. So throughout this essay I plan on drawing from the Republic to talk more about this Philosopher’s ideas.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a man was not subjected to law or punishment would he choose to do what is considered just? In Plato’s The Republic, Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students, states a common view on justice. Justice is simply a lesser evil when compared to the two extremes which are suffering injustice without power to retaliate and doing injustice without suffering consequences. According to Glaucon, all men are inherently unjust, and only do what is just when forced to do so by law. This view of justice can be seen throughout history when leaders, like Nero, do unjust actions for their own personal gain simply because they are free from any consequences.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s Republic begins with a debate on the subject of morality. One by one, Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymachus put forth their definitions of morality and one by one, they come up short. None survive the merciless scrutiny of the author’s mentor, Socrates.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Republic written by Plato, Glaucon presented an argument concerning “the nature and origin of justice”. This argument has caused many beliefs and interpretations from Glaucon about justice. Glaucon presents his arguments by stating the four premises and what each one of them mean. His first premise is “It is by nature good to harm”. This premise is broken up into different meanings by nature, being referred to character individuality, good being referred to an enjoyable experience and harm as a physical or mental injury. This premise shows how being harmed can be beneficial or a good repercussion, through different experiences in life. Overall, the conclusion of this premise shows how justice plays a typical role in society to prohibit people in doing unjust deeds and disrupting the structure of society.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Hamlet Exam

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato’s moral theory consisted of the concept of the soul and the concept of virtue as function. To Plato, the soul has three parts; reason, spirit, and appetite. The reason we do things is to reach a goal or value, our spirit drives us to accomplish our goal, and our desire for things is our appetite. The three virtues that must be fulfilled to reach the fourth, general virtue are temperance, courage, and wisdom, which correlate with the three parts of the soul. In order to achieve inner harmony, every part of the soul must be fulfilling its proper function.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glaucon's Argument

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Book 2 of the Republic, Glaucon is passionate about finding the true meaning of what justice is. To do this he decides to praise injustice in the purest way so that Socrates will refute it and give him the meaning of justice in its purest form. Glaucon approaches the situation by discussing the following three points: the “kind of thing people consider justice to be and what its origins are”, “that all who practice it do so unwillingly, as something necessary, not as something good”, and that “they have good reason to act as they do, for the life of an unjust person is, they say, much better than that of a just one”. Glaucon provides excellent evidence and reasoning for his argument and by looking at it from the view of the natural man, one who doesn’t have a spirit or conscience to refute injustice, his argument holds truth.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This knowledge needs to be complete, rather than for just one skill. So it is recognized that it belongs with the guardians. Next, Glaucon and Socrates try to find where the Athens ' courage comes from. Courage is the "power to preserve under all circumstances, the right, lawful opinion of what is and is not to be feared." Socrates and Glaucon find that the people in the city who exhibit this courageous behavior are the guardians of the city. The class system is based upon the knowledge of the forms, therefore the philosopher kings and the guardians supply wisdom. The auxiliaries provide the courage, and the money makers supply moderation. When all three of these are realized justice is formed.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Is Not Guilty

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the book, Plato Republic, Socrates had a discussion with Thrasymachus and Glaucon about justice and unjustice. In this essay, I shall argue that Plato’s solution of the temptation of the ring is successful in a few ways. I will describe Thrasymachus and Glaucon’s idea about justice, and how Socrates discuss with them in terms of the justice of the city, justice of individual soul, his theory of forms and the importance of the knowledge of the good, and the sun analogy and the allegory of the cave.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato Paper

    • 3226 Words
    • 13 Pages

    After the establishment of consent, there is an issue of opinion versus fact. Basic knowledge is a key for a just city in the sense that there is a point at which people of a city may agree. Plato opens the idea of forms, basic knowledge common to all. People can agree on what a certain object may be, even though particular objects vary and perish, those objects are recognized by a form. These forms as Plato states are imprints that we conceive. We imagine what courage is by imaging a soldier holding his ground or an officer in the…

    • 3226 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Virtues of wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice are ingrained in the life of Plato, as well as the Christian. The Myth of Ers shows the analogy describing the human soul is immortal, the pleasures of the body are mortal; concluding that every desire there is one of an ultimate end (ST I-II.Q.91.2). The final supreme good leads to the ultimate end and Christianity claims the final supreme good is God (Book 19. Ch.2). The responsibility of virtue towards the final good falls back upon the ruler. The City in Speech gives an analogy that virtue of every subject is due to the ruler (ST I-II.Q.92.1).…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics