Ms. Avila 10H Julius Caesar
In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, figurative language (metaphor) is used to show Caesar’s dominant and powerful character and how weak and naive the Roman citizens are. During Act I, Scene III, Cassius is talking to Casca about the current state of Rome and how Caesar views the citizens. He says, “And why should Caesar be a tyrant, then? Poor man, I know he would not be a wolf but that he sees Romans are but sheep.” Caesar is being described as a wolf and the people of Rome as sheep. If you take away Caesar’s power, he no longer has influence over the people. Furthermore, because the citizens of Rome fear his strength and see Caesar as a superior to them, Caesar automatically sees them as the sheep and himself as the wolf. This metaphor is used to show the predator/prey relationship between Caesar and the citizens of Rome. The citizens are weak compared to the power of Caesar. He highlights the fact that Caesar see’s the people of Rome as a prey that he feeds upon in order to increase his powerful influence. As you can see, Cassius is telling this to Casca to manipulate him in bringing Caesar down through the power of persuasion.
The illustration interprets the quote: “And why should Caesar be a tyrant, then? Poor man, I know he would not be a wolf But that he sees the Romans are but sheep.”
In the drawing we drew Julius Caesar holding a lightning bolt and on the other side we drew the Roman citizens. The illustration is divided in half with shows the relative difference between Caesar and the Roman citizens. The Roman citizens are weak and naiveté. They are portrayed as a sheep as stated in the quote, so we decided to draw them as tiny characters, wearing roman style clothing. The colors they are each wearing symbolize how they were portrayed in the relationship between Caesar and the citizens of Rome. The people of Rome were naive because they don’t know any better in trusting Caesar as their ruler. This is shown through their green colored togas. Additionally, the color pink and brown symbolize vulnerability and repression. The Romans are vulnerable and repressed in the way that if any one tells them to do anything, right or wrong, they will listen to them. On the contrast, Caesar is drawn much larger compared to the others, not at all to scale. The Roman citizens are merely players in Caesar’s rule. This shows his dominance in Roman society. Caesar is illustrated in red, purple/violet and black. The color red symbolizes strength and power, in which Caesar has over the people of Rome. Caesar has power because the “sheep” (people) fear him. Evidently, the color purple also symbolizes power, it shows that Caesar is in control and he has the capability to lead the Romans. On the other hand, the color black symbolizes fear. Not that Caesar is fearful himself, but the citizens of Rome fear him. There is a wolf drawn next to Caesar because he is strong, aggressive and dominant just like a wolf. The background colors, red and purple, symbolize the strength and power Caesar endures. The background of the Roman citizens is white, which symbolizes their innocent and purity, and a sheep is illustrated to represent the weakness and vulnerability of the Roman people compared to the wolf. As you can see, in William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, the relationship between ruler and the governed is unbalanced. When Cassius describes this sheep/wolf metaphor to Casca, he is trying to justify and persuade bringing Caesar down from power, and the power of persuasion can be very influential on people.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Is against Caesar’s gaining of power. He believes, however, that Caesar is the consummate actor, lulling the populace into believing that he has no personal ambition.…
- 700 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Shakespeare’s ’Julius Caesar,’ what characters say and think about each other, has a significant impact on the ways in which they themselves, are…
- 1105 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Akin to the Salem Witch Trials that took place in 1692 and 1693, the assassination of the great Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar appeared to be unreasonable or unjust to many of those that honor him. However, unlike the notorious Salem Witch Trials, it is clear that as light manifests itself upon the mysterious reasons in regards to why Julius Caesar was brutally murdered, it is made obvious that Julius Caesar may not have been quite the adored and honorable man that the Romans so hoped for. There was a side to the Julius Caesar that remained hidden by his graciousness and utterly generous facade. This side of the great and almighty Caesar would prove to convince and compel the very Senators that served below him, that Caesar must meet his rather “timely” demise.…
- 744 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…
- 669 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Caesar is a hero and not a tyrant because he was loved by the people of Rome. In the passage it says,” To…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Even in his absence or death, the manner in which characters address Caesar, describe him, and act in his presence, reveals the authority and influence he has over people's lives. From the first scene, Caesar is presented as victorious, having vanquished his rival, Pompey, and as an extremely popular figure among the people, with the commoners even defying authorities to celebrate his victory. As the play continues into scene ii, Caesar appears before the crowds as a modern-day pop-star, surrounded by a trail of subservient entourage. Casca and Antony display complete submission to Caesar, with the latter declaring that 'when Caesar says Do this! It is done' . In Caesar's absence, fellow patricians, Brutus and Cassius, describe him as 'mighty Caesar', a man who 'has now become a God', and strides in the world 'as a Colossus' . It is therefore evident that his close subordinates are jealously affected by his power, an effect which will later germinate into conspiracy. Even after his assassination, Caesar's ghost continues the task of perpetuating the fear of his everlasting power on those he influenced. Caesar holds enough power over his subjects that he is capable of influencing them continually, in his life and…
- 1643 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after the death of Julius Caesar. Through this speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and Brutus.…
- 467 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Language is a dangerous weapon in the arsenal of someone who knows how to use it. While Cassius may be no Hitler, he is good at getting his way, and for now he wants Caesar dead and that makes him very dangerous indeed. This is real danger even today; people buy into rhetoric without considering where it comes from and what the consequences of it might be. This is a very disturbing thought, one that is more than likely to make a few readers share Caesar’s suspicion of Cassius and other quick…
- 1059 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…
- 913 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Manipulation, in essence, is a timeless recurring theme not only in literature, but in our everyday life. William Shakespeare’s drama, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is saturated with rhetorical strategies. Brutus, Cassius, and Antony use their words throughout different parts of the play to sway other people’s opinions. Cassius’s persuasion is so powerful it leads to the death of Julius Caesar. Brutus is left with the repercussions of the assassination and has to speak to the Romans. Brutus and Antony go back-to-back speaking to the Romans using rhetorical strategies to explain their diverse views on the event. These three characters’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos was so compelling it persuaded the other people’s views, caused Caesar’s death,…
- 940 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Cassius admits that Caesar is treated like a god and recalls events of Caesar’s physical weakness. Caesar was a powerful man who planned to become the supreme ruler of the Roman Empire in order to solve the many economic, political and military problems the empire was against. While, there were people that feared such a powerful man because this dictator threatened his/her position. Cassius voices his reason for Caesar being unfit to rule, Cassius says, “Men at some time are masters of their fates: The fault, Dear Brutus is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings” (Shakespeare, I, i, 139-141). Saying that it is not his/her fate to blame, but that is his/her own fault that they have not done anything to make them great. Cassius blames his and Brutus’s lack of will to grant Caesar to power. Cassius and Brutus’s jealously of Caesar makes it unjustifiable to kill him. In her article, Alice Shalvi argues, “Shakespeare implicitly condemns the conspiracy, then, on two scores: firstly, because it inevitably involves moral corruption even in the best and noblest of men and, secondly, because murder is always no matter in what…
- 545 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…
- 895 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…
- 987 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Figurative Language Identifications 1) Simile “…How like a deer, strucken by many princes, Dost thou here lie!” -Antony (Act III, Scene I) 2) Setting “…Who to Philippi here consorted us.” -Cassius (Act V, Scene I) 3) Personification “O conspiracy, Sham’st thou to show thy dang’rous brow by night, When evils are most free?…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare is widely regarded as one of the greatest English writers in history because of his use of figurative language writing skills. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses figurative language multiple times throughout the play. Shakespeare uses figurative language in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar to create a special effect or feeling for the reader. Some examples of figurative language that Shakespeare uses throughout the play includes: verbal irony, personification and metaphors. By using figurative language in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare indirectly expresses his ideas to the readers.…
- 475 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays