Preview

Calcul Casing

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Calcul Casing
Journal of Risk Research 8 (7–8), 679–691 (October–December 2005)

Greenpeace v. Shell: media exploitation and the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF)
VIAN BAKIR* University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, Wales

Abstract
This paper examines the usefulness of the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) in understanding the media’s role in risk communication. Since the SARF was created in 1988, it has been both further developed and critiqued for (amongst other things) its: static conception of communication; lack of attention towards how key actors use the media; lack of systematic attention towards the media as an amplification station; and simplistic assumptions of how the media operate as an amplification station. A complex heavilymediated risk communication case study—the battle between Greenpeace and Shell over the deep-sea disposal of the Brent Spar oil rig (1995)—is used to explore whether the SARF in its current stage of development stands up to these critiques. It is concluded that these critiques are more a consequence of how researchers have used the SARF rather than a fault of the SARF itself. Using the SARF framework with a qualitative case study methodology enabled systematic analysis of the role of relevant media in the social amplification of risk in the Spar issue, exposing how Greenpeace used the media to successfully communicate three risk signals, together with the inadequacies of Shell’s reactions; and revealing the layering within amplification stations, including the media itself.
KEY WORDS :

Social Amplification of Risk Framework, risk signals, Greenpeace, Shell, news media

Introduction
This paper examines the usefulness of the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF) in understanding the media’s role in risk communication. The SARF aims to examine contextually how risk and risk events interact with psychological, social, institutional, and cultural processes in ways that amplify or attenuate risk perceptions and



References: Bate, R. (1999) The Environment: Greenpeace Provides No Public Benefit, Economic Affairs 19(4), 52. Bourdieu, P. (1998) On Television and Journalism, London: P1uto. Burns, W. J. (1990) Introducing Structural Models and Influence Diagrams into Risk Perception Research: Their Value for Theory Construction and Decision-Making, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Decision Sciences, University of Oregon. Burns, W. J., Slovic, P., Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X., Renn, O. and Emani, S. (1993) Incorporating structural models into research on the social amplification of risk: implications for theory construction and decision making, Risk Analysis 13(6), 661–623. Cracknell, J. (1993) Issue arenas, pressure groups and environmental agendas, in A. Hansen (ed.) The Mass Media and Environmental Issues, pp. 3–20. Leicester: Leicester University Press. Dale, S. (1996) McLuhan’s Children: the Greenpeace Message and the Media, Toronto: Between the Lines. Dickson, L. (1996) Shell, the Brent Spar and Greenpeace: a Doomed Tryst? Environmental Politics 5(1), 122–129. Eldridge, J. and Reilly, J. (2003) Risk and relativity: BSE and the British media, in N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson and P. Slovic (eds) The Social Amplification of Risk, pp. 138–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Financial Times (1995a) UK Under Fire On Oil Platform Disposal, Financial Times, 9 June 1995. Financial Times (1995b) Brent Spar Dents Oil Giant’s Pride Rather Than Its Profit, Financial Times, 20 June 1995. Financial Times (1995c) Company struggles to accept disaster, Financial Times, 21 June 1995. Gee, D. (1996) Role of the EEA and the Media in Shaping Perceptions. Reporting the Environment Conference, Centre for Journalism Studies, University of Wales, Cardiff, 19–21 May 1996. Greenpeace (1995) No Grounds for Dumping: the Decommissioning and Abandonment of Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms, Greenpeace. Guardian Education (1997) The Guardian, 11 February 1997. Hansen, A. (1991) The media and the social construction of the environment, Media, Culture and Society 13, 443–458. Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O. and Slovic, P. (1988) Social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework, Risk Analysis 8, 177–187. Kasperson, R. E. and Kasperson, J. X. (1991) Hidden hazards, in D. C. Mayo and R. Hollander (eds) Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, pp. 9–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kasperson, R. E. (1992) The social amplification of risk: progress in developing an integrative framework, in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds) Social Theories of Risk, pp. 153–178. Westport, CT: Praeger. Greenpeace v. Shell 691 Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D. and Tuler, P. (1992) Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks, Journal of Social Issues 48, 161–187. Kasperson, R. and Kasperson, J. (1996) The social amplification and attenuation of risk, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 545, 95–105. Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., Pidgeon, N. and Slovic, P. (2003) The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory, in N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson and P. Slovic (eds) The Social Amplification of Risk, pp. 13–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Knight, P. (1998) Profits and Principles—Does There Have to be a Choice? The Shell Report, Shell International Limited. Layder, D. (1998) Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research, London: Sage. Lofstedt, R. E. and Renn, O. (1997) The Brent Spar controversy: an example of risk communication ¨ gone wrong, Risk Analysis 17(2), 131–135. Murdock, G., Petts, J. and Horlick-Jones, T. (2003) After amplification: rethinking the role of the media in risk communication, in N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson and P. Slovic (eds) The Social Amplification of Risk, pp. 156–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Neale, A. (1997) Organisational learning in contested environments, lessons from the Brent Spar, Business Strategy and the Environment 6, 93–103. OSPAR Convention (1992) Annex III of the Prevention and Elimination of Pollution and Elimination of Pollution from Offshore Sources. Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T. and Murdock, G. (2001) Social Amplification of Risk: the Media and the Public. HSE Books. Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. E. and Slovic, P. (2003) Introduction, in N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson and P. Slovic (eds) The Social Amplification of Risk, pp. 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rayner, S. (1988) Muddling through metaphors to maturity: a commentary on Kasperson et al, ‘The Social Amplification of Risk’, Risk Analysis 8(2), 201–204. Regester, M. and Larkin, J. (1997) Risk Issues and Crisis Management: a Casebook of Best Practice, London: Kogan Page. Renn, O. (1991) Risk communication and the social amplification of risk, in R. E. Kasperson and PJ. M. Stallen (eds) Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives, pp. 287–324. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Renn, O. (1992) Risk communication: Towards a rational discourse with the public, Journal of Hazardous Materials 29, 465–519. Renn, O., Burns, W. J., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E. and Slovic, P. (1992) The social amplification of risk: theoretical foundations and empirical applications, Journal of Social Issues 48, 137–160. Rip, A. (1988) Should Social Amplification of Risk be Counteracted? Risk Analysis 8(2), 193–197. Rose, C. (1998) The Turning of the Spar, London: Greenpeace. Rose, C. (1993) Beyond the Struggle for Proof: Factors Changing the Environmental Movement, Environmental Values 2, 285–298. Rudall Blanchard Associates (1994) Brent Spar Abandonment BPEO. Shell Exploration & Production. Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Svenson, O. (1988) Mental models of risk, communication, and action: reflections on social amplification of risk, Risk Analysis 8(2), 199–200. The Battle for Brent Spar, BBC2, 3 August 1995. The Economist, 24 June 1995. Tsoukas, H. (1999) David and Goliath in The Risk Society: Making Sense of the Conflict Between Shell and Greenpeace in The North Sea, Organisation: Actor Network Theory and Managerialism 6(3), 499–528.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. What is the cultural perspective of risk? What does Bell mean when he says there has developed a “culture of risk”? How does this correspond with Bell’s discussion of Ulrich Beck’s theory of “risk society”?…

    • 271 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I knew that fracking was a contentious issue to say the least, and I have always held some degree of disdain towards big oil companies so I cannot say I was unbiased at the outset. My initial perception while watching Gasland was that this industry might actually help the communities mentioned in the film, however, I changed my tack very quickly when I began to think about how fracking makes inequality even worse, a sad truth, but an evident one. In that way, my perception of communities affected by fracking was unjustified and wrong. Though my perception of fracking communities was wrong, my perception of oil companies was galvanized further. It is obvious that these massive corporations are only out for profit, which is an obvious truth, but one that is hugely important. They do not care about who they are driving out of their homes, what they are doing to vulnerable communities or what happens when they leave. The bottom line is the only thing that matters and if worsening inequality is the price, then they have no problem paying it. My perception of people paid off by these companies is harmful because my initial thought was that this was a good thing for less fortunate people, when it clearly is not. The mistake in my perception of big oil companies is that the damage caused cannot be reversed, and that they are unstoppable, when the power to stop them is very much in the hands of the average person. The environmental effects are no doubt horrible, but I feel as though the social effects must be discussed more in order to make the changes necessary to put an end to…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This campaign came after the British government approved a proposal by Shell UK for the deep sea disposal of the Brent spar oil storage in the north Atlantic (Bennie 1998). This caused outrage and the Greenpeace organised a worldwide, high-profile media campaign against them which included activists occupying the Brent Spar for more than three weeks. This campaign was supported by European governments and the public, causing the widespread boycott of Shell service stations. In the face of this public and political opposition, along with pressure from their sister companies in Europe, Shell UK abandoned their plans to dispose Brent Spar at sea (Bennie 1998). Three years later, Shell announced Brent Spar would be recycled into “a series of rings which would be sunk onto the seabed to form an industrial quayside” in Norway (Bennie 1998). After the Greenpeace protest in 1995, deep sea disposal has now become “politically unacceptable” causing a meeting of European governments to debate a European wide ban on sea disposal in 1998. The tactics of the Greenpeace in this campaign were clear – their concept of “dramatic pseudo-events” along with “skilful public relations.” This protest against the large corporate business like Shell UK and the government appealed greatly to the general public. The campaign had a “David and Goliath” narrative to it, which allured the public into backing Greenpeace…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hurricane Katrina hit the Southeast Gulf Coast of Louisiana on August 29, 2005 as a category 3 hurricane. It was the costliest and one of the top five deadliest storms in United States history. There were approximately 1,800 deaths and this number is disputed to be higher in some reports. Nearly all the deaths resulted because a large segment of the population in the city of New Orleans did not evacuate (Burton and Silver 2006).…

    • 3680 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    INTRODUCTION BP, formerly British Petroleum and the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, has experienced a lot of ups and downs over its hundred-year history—from nearly bankrupting its founder William D’Arcy to becoming one of the world’s largest energy companies. BP has also experienced its fair share of controversies regarding business practices, environmental damage, and hazards to workers. It and all other large energy companies have come under fire for releasing huge amounts of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. For some time, BP has attempted to turn a page in its history book toward a more environmentally-friendly future through investments in renewable energy and a support of ethics and compliance initiatives. British Petroleum changed its name to BP and then tried to rebrand itself as Beyond Petroleum. This rebranding was a signal to stakeholders that it was focused on sustainability and the need to move beyond nonrenewable energy sources. When a company tries to reposition itself as socially responsible and sustainable, it has an obligation to attempt to fulfill those policies. However, BP’s efforts backfired when on April 20, 2010 the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, operated under the oversight of BP, created one of the greatest offshore oil disasters in history. This unfortunate event has made BP the poster boy for negligence and environmental degradation. Not until August 2010 did there appear to be a final resolution to stopping the oil leak. This case provides an opportunity to observe the past efforts of BP to improve its image, along with how these efforts were rendered virtually useless after the oil spill. Before delving into recent issues that BP has faced, a brief history of BP is given to provide some background. Certain disasters resulting from company negligence are detailed in this analysis, and although BP made efforts to establish itself as a socially responsible company, the recent oil spill…

    • 8543 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Media plays dynamic role in the society. One of the roles is that it carries out the surveillance of the environment. Media helps in disclosing any threats as well as opportunities that may affect the community (Dougherty, 1999). This thus helps the people to take advantage of the opportunities and at the same time prevent threats from harming innocent individuals. Secondly, the media has an ethical importance to the society because it helps in making the society aware of the…

    • 1029 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The hydrocarbon producers, one of the communicators, credibility is lessened against other communicators such as Greenpeace, because many in the public realm view them as big business, just out to make money. They are perceived as untrustworthy and less credible.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Communiation Crisis Paper

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Zoeteman, B. J., Kersten, W. C., Vos, W. F., de Voort, L, & Ale, M (2010). Communication management during risk evens and crises in a globalized world: Predictability of domestic media attention for calamities, Journal of risk research, 13 (3), 279-30. Doi: 10, 1080/13669870902955427…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As technology advances we increasingly use news media as a means of communication, when all else fails. Immediately after Hurricane Katrina, the news and internet media took on the responsibility as a main source of information. This essentially made them responsible for unfolding many unnecessary events. Many news reporters and journalist contributed to the spread of false rumors and overstatements that have been proven to have negative impacts on relief efforts. Since the 21st century the term “media” has expanded and altered the public’s opinion tremendously. As proven by the inaccurate portrayal through skewed communication during Hurricane Katrina, the American media has begun to have negative effects on the consequences of natural disasters.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Romeo and Juliet, each character has a specific role and for the main character, Romeo, seems to be the one who changes the most. Romeo changes throughout the play as he is constantly become mature. As Romeo’s thoughts, feelings and actions have revealed his great changes among all other characters. According to the play, Romeo presented three palpable changes as the followings, he gets over Rosaline right after meeting Juliet, his hatred towards Tybalt changes into love back and forth, and he forgets about his desire to die right after receiving the message from Nurse. These changes made Romeo’s character even more important and appealing, which presented the love, hatred and violence of play. Firstly, Romeo changes the most because he quickly gets over Rosaline right after meeting Juliet in the first Act. Romeo is first presented as a lovesick boy who is greatly depressed about Rosaline’s refusals. But then, after Romeo encounters Juliet in the Capulet’s party, he apparently forgets about Rosaline and falls in love with Juliet. Meanwhile his mood changes from vulnerable to excited and confident, this has shown that Romeo is quite fickle and immature in love. For example, in the play when Romeo first sees Rosaline in the party he mutters “Did my heart love till now? Forswear it, sight!/ For I ne’er saw true beauty till this night.” (I. v. 52-53). He completely forgets about Rosaline that he loved so much before and how fast he falls in love with Juliet at first sight. Also, in the play when Romeo leaves Juliet’s balcony to Friar Lawrence place, he informs Friar Lawrence about his plan for marring Juliet, “With Rosaline, my ghostly father? No!/ I have forgot that name, and that name woe.” (II. iii. 46-47). Romeo even forgets Rosaline’s name with the sorrow she brings him. Indeed, Romeo is becoming positive and enthusiastic about love again while he gets over Rosaline after meeting Juliet. Soon, Romeo’s love changes to…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dangerousness Essay

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages

    2. Brown M (2010) Theorising Dangerousness. In Nash M and A Williams (eds) Handbook of Public Protection. (pp40-59) Oxford: London…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay About Greenwash

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Guber, D.L. and Bosso, C.J. 2007, ‘Framing ANWR: Citizens, Consumers, and the Privileged Position of Business’, Business and environmental policy, pp.36-60.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The media affects the public in many different ways. Many people turn to the media for information because they feel that it is a credible and trustworthy source. The media takes advantage of the credibility speaker effect by using dramatic catch phrases and headlines to get people to seek out and pay attention to their information. (Newman, Lesson 8) These dramatic catch phrases often involve fear appeals; persuading people to watch by scaring them into thinking they have information they can not miss. (Newman, Lesson 8) This could be seen in the media before the economy was officially in a recession. Headlines used to get attention influence the public perceptions of what is to come in the future. Most people cannot even begin to understand the complicated workings of the economy, much less be fully informed on the day to day facts of current conditions. Therefore, the availability heuristic, making decisions based on what comes to mind most easily, is often influenced by the information that is read in the morning paper and seen on the evening news. (Newman, Lesson 9)…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Nurse, Creese, Goldsmith, & Lamberts, (2011) have pointed that there is no one size fits all communication strategy.Several risk communication strategies have been proposed by risk communication scholars; some of these approaches are participatory risk communication strategy; probability risk communication strategy; contextualized approach crisis communication strategy; care communication strategy consensus communication strategy; public relations; stakeholder relations; outrage communication; technocratic risk…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand how actors create a controversy over a technology it is best understood from Ulrich Beck’s theory of risk society. Beck explains how society moves from an industrial society to a risk society through two phases. Phase one: where self-harm is systematically produced but is not a public issue or in any way the center of political conflict, and phase two: hazards from the industrial society now dominate the political and public debates (Beck, 1999, pp. 72). These phases are distinguished due to an increase in knowledge distribution, and the understanding that calculable risks in an industrial society became incalculable and unpredictable now in a risk society. Understanding the different levels of risk interpretation by different actors builds support on why they may or may not support a technology. In the case of hydraulic fracturing, proponents argue fracking outcomes result in simplistic risks, which means they are manageable and can be easily calculated. In responding to…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays