Preview

Cameras in Court

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cameras in Court
Running Head: MOUSSAOUI TRIAL

Televising Moussaoui Federal Trial
Gerhard A. Grove
Dr. Ferry
PSC201
Northwood University

Televising Moussaoui Federal Trial
Abstract
This paper will cover the current issue and controversy of televising the Zacarias Moussaoui federal trial. The trial is the first trial of a suspected terrorist involved with the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center attacks. I intend to show that the decision of U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema to ban photographers and Court TV from the proceedings was wrong, based on the constitutional rights of the public and previous statutes. This paper will cover various cases involving televised court proceedings and public opinion concerning the media coverage of criminal trials.

Table of Contents
Background 4
Cameras in the Court 5
Supreme Court 6
Cameras Introduced to the Courts 8
Justification for Televising Moussaoui 9
Summary 10
References 11

Background
On September 11, 2001, perhaps the most vicious assault on the United States was committed in the form of a terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York. This attack claimed the lives of more than three thousand souls made up of innocent civilians, firefighters, and police officers. The incident involved the highjacking of two civilian airliners and using them as missiles to bring down the Trade Center. At the time the attacks were taking place in New York, an identical attack was being carried out against the Pentagon. This attack also involved the highjacking of two airliners and using them as missiles. Civilians aboard one airliner intervened, sacrificing their lives and preventing the terrorist from completing their unthinkable attack. The second group of terrorist was successful in their mission and took the lives of over three hundred inside the Pentagon.
Muslim extremist belonging to the Al Qaeda terrorist group carried out these attacks. Usama Bin Laden , the most notorious terrorist and the



References: Associated Press (2002, January 18). Judge denies Court TV 's request to televise Moussaoui 's trial. . Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 4, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=sb1011394319936007480.djm Cohn, M. & Dow, D. (1998). Cameras in the courtroom. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company, Inc. Cummings, M. C., JR., & Wise, D. (2001). Democracy under pressure (9th ed.). New York: Harcourt College Publishers. Estes vs. Texas (1965). 381 U.S. 532.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    1. Attorney Benjamin Walton is arguing there is no evidence of “Actual Knowledge of Visible Intoxicfication” and that the court should grant this motion. The bartender (Mr. John Daniels) of O’Malley’s though charged 13 drinks to Mr. Hard’s account and yes did see Mr. Hard drink 11 of the beverages in a short period of time but, at no time' during the service did the bartender have “Actual Knowledge of Visible Intoxification” of Mr. Hard's under the Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. Even though he tried to hit Mr. White on their leaving the establishment, lost his balance and fell. Mr. Hard was able to get up by himself with no…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Fight for Freedom for Journalists “A First Amendment Blind Spot” was published in The Wall Street Journal by Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. The author is a partner of the Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP. He is also the co-chair of the International Women’s Media Foundation. Moreover, he was denominated by the National Law Journal as one of 100 most influential lawyers in America (“Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., JD Biography”).…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the eleventh of September, 2001, four planes set off bound for separate destinations across the United States of America. Little did the passengers know as they boarded these planes that they would never live to see another day, as Muslim hijackers were onboard the flights with the intention of launching a terrorist attack on the country. Two of the four planes were deliberately crashed into the Twin Towers in Lower Manhattan, New York City, killing thousands of people and injuring hundreds more. A third plane was flown, once again deliberately, into the Pentagon – the headquarters of the US Department of Defence – killing everyone on board. The fourth plane was bound for the country’s capital city, Washington D.C., but the passengers managed to stop the hijackers from reaching this destination and instead crashed the aircraft into a field in Pennsylvania. Everyone on board the plane was still killed, but they saved hundreds of innocent…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WECT Staff. (2012). Guilty: Plea deal reached for men involved in riot before hankins’ death. Retrieved from http://www.wect.com/story/18780887/plea-deal-reached-for-man-involved-in-riot-before-marcus-hankins-death…

    • 880 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    George Zimmerman

    • 1838 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This paper examines, analyzes and synthesizes many credible sources by examining several aspects of the “George Zimmerman Murder Trial.” The sources examine the high profile, media frenzied court case involving George Zimmerman, in which Zimmerman was tried regarding the killing of an African American teenager by the name of Trayvon Martin. This paper gives a description of the charges filed, the impact of the media on the case, the issues of the case, and the outcome of the case.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    September 11, 2001, a day no American can forget. On this day 19 members of a terrorist group called al-Qaeda hijacked 4 U.S. airplanes and used them to strike various targets on the East Coast. Two of the hijacked planes hit twin towers in New York City and the third plane was flown into the Pentagon in Arlington, where the U.S. military is headquartered. The fourth plane was heading for the capitol in Washington, however crashed in Pennsylvania after the onboard passengers fought the hijackers. As a result of this catastrophe nearly 3,000 people were killed. Since the September 11 attacks, many things have changed in New York City and in the United States. The government has greatly increased security around the country, especially…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ray Rice Domestic Violence

    • 1680 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mass media critical frameworks are methodologies or tools used to analyze media messages. I will be taking an in-depth look at the media’s portrayal of the “Ray Rice case” and discussing various concepts, theories, and terms to reach a critical understanding of the case as a media consumer and critic. Following my analysis I will then conclude with interpreting what was the media’s purpose throughout the coverage, and whether it was to inform, entertain, or persuade us as media consumers.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Janda, Kenneth. Berry, Jeffrey. Goldman, Jerry (2008). The Challenge of Democracy (9th ed.). Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do terrorists have rights? Should Terrorists have legal protection? This is not an easy question to answer. This question poses an interesting dilemma, reason being these people are on the Federal Government’s list of most dangerous criminals. Also, most if not all are not legal U.S. naturalized citizens. The US Constitution clears states that in Article one section nine halts Congress from stopping the “honor” of habeas corpus in all cases excluding cases of revolt or assault. However, all humans have so- called “natural rights” and that’s what the Constitution and Deceleration of Independence are all about. According to (businessdictionary.com) natural rights are defined as political theory that maintains that an individual enters into society with certain basic rights and that no government can deny these rights. The modern idea of natural rights grew out of the ancient and medieval doctrines of natural law, i.e., the belief that people, as creatures of nature and God, should live their lives and organize their society on the basis of rules and precepts laid down by nature or God. With the growth of the idea of individualism, especially in the 17th cent., natural law doctrines were modified to stress the fact that individuals, because they are natural beings, have rights that cannot be violated by anyone or by any society. The Bill Of Rights observes some of the natural rights’ and the Fifth Amendment specifies that, in criminal cases, “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process”. Equally, without the 5th amendment, all people have the so-called “natural right” to due process. As always you need your chance to prove you’re innocence before they prove your guilt.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neubauer, D.W. (2004). America 's Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Thomson Wadsworth Criminal courts/ United States.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Siegel, L. J., Schmalleger, F., & Worrall, J. L. (2011). Courts and Criminal Justice in…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Oklahoma City Bombing

    • 2384 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nye, Chad F. Law and Society : Journalism and Justice in the Oklahoma City Bombing Trials. El Paso, TX, USA: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, 2013. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 3 April 2015.…

    • 2384 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pistorius Trial

    • 358 Words
    • 1 Page

    On February 25, 2014, Judge President Dunstan Mlambo ruled in the High Court in Pretoria that the entire trial may be broadcast live via audio and that parts of the trial may be broadcast live via television, namely the opening and closing arguments, the testimony of consenting state witnesses, the judgment, and the sentencing if applicable. The media such as ESPN, TIME, ABC, CNN and likes of a few other big name media got ahold to the case due to the fame…

    • 358 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although we discussed surveillance and media in a more obvious form, reality television, I believe this example is just as applicable. In terms of the physical surveillance, the court case in 1999 brought out all sorts of forms of evidence that spoke to the movements of Syed on the day of the crime and, most notably, cell phone records and what towers were pinged during phone calls. It is worth noting that it is one of the first instances this was used in a Maryland court. Secondly, this was a capital crime trial in which a massive community was aware of and bore witness to. Lastly, and this is obvious, but as a convicted and incarcerated felon he is under constant surveillance and the actions and proceedings which put him there are open for anyone to…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays