Preview

Can Breaking the Law Ever Be Justified?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
694 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Can Breaking the Law Ever Be Justified?
Anav Pradhan (GP2)
Can breaking the law ever be justified?
Imagine a world without those brave people who dared to not abide by the law and fight for a right. A world without Gandhi would be a world without independent India; without Mandela there would be white superiority in Africa; without freedom fighters, there would be no democracy in Nepal. I believe that all the actions of such law breakers are good, even though they were against various laws, and such actions can be justified to some extent. Even though laws are meant to maintain order and protect rights, it is not always justified; some might be unfair to minorities whereas others might stir up a revolution. Some just violate human rights. In such cases, civil disobedience might be necessary.
“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed” said Martin Luther King Jr. The righteousness of revolt is shown by this remark made by a great revolutionary himself. Indeed, so much of justice has been served through revolutions. Gandhi, in India chased the British away through non-violent methods. Marching on, producing salt and breaking the law, Gandhi took a stubborn stance, without violent means, showing that they would not handle the British rule anymore. This established a happier independent India. Similarly, Mandela broke the racial barrier in South Africa, by breaking the law he helped in establishing greater good.
Another major reason for breaking the law is because of one’s religion or culture. The French law has recently banned wearing the Islamic attire called ‘niqab’. An extreme effort to bring equality into the Muslim society, it is equally an imposition to women’s freedom. People put religion before law in some cases and rightfully so. It is not moral for the law to tell someone what not to wear; it is taking the freedom of choice away. It is a violation of human rights and not at all worthy of being called an offense.
Similarly, public nudity is also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.” (“Albert Camus Quotes”) Albert Camus famously quoted this to state that to be truly free from an unfair place, you must be so free that doing anything will be a rebellious act against the government. Both Chris McCandless and Mahatma Gandhi displayed rebellious acts through their lives.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi, Indian nationalist, and the man credited with liberating India from British rule led a campaign of non-violent, civil disobedience that made the continued stay in the country by the British colonizers politically and morally untenable. Imprisoned by the British for fomenting unrest, Gandhi confronted the colonizers’ force of arms with the power of his ideas, and the rightness of his cause, and by his act of courageous disobedience prevailed gloriously over the British in the end. Today, India is a vibrant democracy of 1.2 billion people, free because of the disobedience of one frail, unprepossessing man, Mahatma Gandhi.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Take Gandhi's famous salt march, for example. In an effort to avoid paying taxes on salt to the British government, he led a massive march spanning 24 days. While he was ultimately jailed for this for a short time, the march spurred on India's journey for independence. He acted as a catalyst, helping millions of people gain their freedom after years of tyrannical rule and oppression.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As King wrote, “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty” (King 3). Most people agree with this statement. Here, King explained the correct way to go about an unjust law. He stated that when a law is unjust, it must be broken for the sake of the good. He also mentioned that everyone must take responsibility for his or her actions, and everyone must also do this in a nonviolent manner. With this said, society must also support these protestors.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a connection between the type of people who engage in peaceful protest and the laws they are fighting for or against. That is, people who recognize them that violence is not the answer and who go about change in a civilized manner have a 6th sense. That sense being hindsight. They are able to recognize that an unjust law is no law at all (King Jr.). If the civil, conscience people of America calls a law into question,…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1891, Irish author Oscar Wilde observed, “Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man’s original virtue, it is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion.” I believe that this rings true, because most, if not all, social progression that has been made throughout the course of American history, has been a result of rebellion, usually against something that a group of people felt was unfair. A prime example of this is Martin Luther King Jr. He was, at the time, seen as disobedient in the eyes of the law, but as a result, made major progress for African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. was disobedient in terms of laws he felt were unjust, and led an African American rebellion against them.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi employed a campaign of peaceful resistance in the first half of the twentieth so that India could be independent from Great Britain and possess institutions that protected the rights of Indians. Some years later, American civil rights organizations continued this approach, organizing sit-ins and marches to force governments to change policies that discriminated against African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote that civil disobedience,“seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue”. It uses the power of the people to force institutional action. Civil disobedience tactics can be just as effective today, just look at Cedric Herrou a French farmer who illegally transported African migrants into France for humanitarian reasons.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience, or refusing to obey the law to protest peacefully, has been one of the most effective ways of changing government policies. In many cases throughout history, fairer societies have been created after laws were challenged. For example, American colonists protested against British taxes by refusing to pay them. This eventually led to the founding of the United States. Colonists went against the law to improve their way of living and end an unfair tax. They were able to initiate change and spark…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Disobedience is a very controversial topic due to the fact that history represents such a wide range of extremities of this ideology. Disobedience can be perceived in many different ways and it can either help or destroy the structure of society. An example of disobedience in society that has proved very successful in the past is civil disobedience. Throughout history, civil disobedience has made a huge impact on the U.S. government and is responsible for several popular social reforms. Many of the world’s most inspirational leaders used civil disobedience to reconstruct society and develop remarkable social change. Examples of these leaders include Ghandi, Martin Luther King Jr., Susan B. Anthony, and Rosa Parks. These people were able to…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it ever be justifiable to break the law? Basically the question is would you break the law if it was for a good reason. For that I would say yes. Even though, laws are meant to maintain order in a citsatie. There’s certain sichwashions were it would be best for what is happing.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, peaceful protests only effectuate change when the participants are lawful and accepting of consequences. Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr, and Nelson Mandela are examples of participants who used civil disobedience to leave an impression. Gandhi adopted ideas from Henry David Thoreau’s, 'On the Duty of Civil Disobedience', to shape his approach to obstruct corruption. During the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr. constantly promoted peace and justice to the nation, despite the vulnerable position he held. Nelson Mandela also acted upon Thoreau’s ideas when he attempted to end the apartheid in South Africa. Each of these three activists successfully effectuated modifications to their country’s government. However, if participants were to resist legislation without accepting the repercussions, it would promote anarchy. Without legal cooperation, their actions would represent utter lawlessness. The government of a free society is designed to consider its people’s best interests, so why would it be effective to bite the hand that feeds? When individuals do not accept consequences associated with resistance, they obstruct the necessary mutual respect between the individual and the state. Without which the purpose of resistance would be insignificant, as the authority would have no desire to cooperate with the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, many people fail to recognize that their struggles were made worth it by peaceful misbehavior and breaking of the law. Similarly like Martin L. King Jr. and Rosa Parks, there are innumerable people who have done the same for diverse rights of the people. Disobedience has been part of our history, but no one realizes that both individuals bent laws for those they loved. Everybody has to defy the rules at some point in their life and us ourselves do not know if our acts of protest will be part of a legacy just like theirs. “Disobedience”, should not have a pessimistic connotation, but instead be appreciated as a virtuous strength and progress to change a city, a state, a country, a continent, and even the…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable.” (Henry David Thoreau)…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful Protest

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peaceful Protest and civil disobedience have been a hallmark of change from the early 20th century onwards. Though nonviolent efforts, multiple civil movements have peacefully broken a law in order to protest an injustice of said law. Usually done in a coordinated manner by a large group of people, these protest have been strikingly effective in bettering the systems they have set out to change. Peaceful resistance is therefore one of the most effective ways of protesting and correcting unjust and broken laws, and is a staple of free society.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charter Of Rights Essay

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Illogically enough, this right is not compulsory all around the world. For instance, burkinis have been banned in fifteen towns in France, including Cannes and Nice. A burkini is a lightweight swimsuit worn by Islamic women that covers the entire body excluding the hands, face, and feet. Burqas, hijabs, and niqabs, also worn by Islamic women, have been banned in French towns as well. In one incident, just after the finalization of the burkini ban in Nice, a woman was confronted by French police for wearing a tunic. She was peacefully resting on a beach in Nice with her family. The unreasonable officers then forced the woman to humiliate herself by removing some of her clothing. They proceeded to give her a ticket, which unrightfully claimed that she was not “wearing an outfit respecting good morals and secularism.” The only component that is immoral about this situation is the infringement of a woman’s right to wear whatever she wants in public, and the harassment she faced in being coerced, with the threat of pepper spray, to undress. If this attack was actually about protecting secularism, then nuns would not be allowed to wear their religious habits in public, but they are. This ban is an attack on cultural…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays