Argument 1: No, thinking is too complicated. Even if we someday come to understand all the laws and principles that govern the mind, that doesn’t mean that we can duplicate it. Does understanding astrophysics mean that we can build a galaxy?
Argument 2: I am not a machine . I’m me.I’m alive. And you’re never going to make a computer that can say that.
Argument 3: The essence of humanity isn’t reason or logic or any of the other things that computers can do: it’s intuition, sensuality, and emotion.
Argument 4: Can a computer think if it does not feel, and how can it feel if it knows nothing of love, anguish, exhilaration, loneliness, and all the rest of what it means to be a living human being?
Argument 5: A computer can’t think. It only make use of human intelligence to process it program.
Argument 6: Even if computers were conscious they would not be self-aware, so they would need to be able to think and know that they are thinking.
Argument 7: Computers are programmed; they have no ability to process ideas, thoughts or feelings. A machine is programmed what to think, not HOW to think. Computers can reach a conclusion based on logistics, not on emotion. They have no 'human factor', and no free will.
Argument 8: The “big blue” chess computer that beat the best chess player in the world. At the time this was a scare to humans, but the computer wasn’t exactly thinking, it was responding
Argument 9: Video
Argument 10: Video 2
Argument 11: The original imitation game is played by three people: a male, a female, and an interrogator who cannot see or hear the other two players. The interrogator’s task is to find out who is male and who is female on the basis of written questions and answers. What makes the game interesting is that one of the players tries to fool the interrogator about his or her sexual identity while the other player gives honest answers. The Turing Test replaces the two players of different sexes with a human and a digital computer. The interrogator’s objective is to determine which of the two players is human and which is the computer. Turing’s question is “Will the interrogator decide wrongly as often when the game is played like this as when it is played with a male and a female?”
Argument 16: Was what these computers were and are doing thinking or responding? Is the level of thinking by the computers comparable to humans? A human mind has emotions, feelings, and consciousness, which a computer doesn’t have… yet. The thought of computers thinking may alarm many people and some may not want to acknowledge the possibilities if computers could think. If computers were made to think as complexly as a human mind then the human race would be worth no more than a fun toy or cool pet to have around.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In this paper I will be discussing two arguments models; one is from a philosopher‘s view and the other is from a psychologist’s view. I will explain how and why these models are important. I will also discuss my understanding of the thinking and justification of each model of argument by compare and contrasting the two arguments.…
- 763 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
| |Write a 350- to 700-word response describing the use of argument and logic in the excerpt that| | |…
- 2268 Words
- 10 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the article, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, Turning explores communication between machines and animals. Turning proposes a test called “The Imitation game”, in which at first did not involve any type of computer intelligence, but just a man and a woman. Turning then proposed a modification of the game which involved a human (of any gender) and a computer on the side. The judge’s main goal is to decide which contestant is human and which is the machine (Peters 235). Peters connects the Turning Test to Judith Butler claiming that this game is an example of what Judith butler would call gender trouble. Within the game, the idea of gender seems more prominent than the actual difference between a machine and a…
- 761 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
…as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial…
- 937 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
1.11) The latter statement is true, in a sense. Yes computers only do what they’re told, but they also learn from what they do. After a certain period of time they know what works and what doesn’t. You can look at two children the same way. Child A is brought up in a good home, enrolled in school, taught right from wrong. Child B is raised in a less than favorable neighborhood, not enrolled in school, and does not have much parental guidance. Child A has a completely different view of the world from Child B. Children can only do what their parents (programmers) tell them to do. But does that mean Child B will never succeed in anything or that Child A will always do great things? The answer is no, There are outside factors that affect children (programs). The program performs its tasks and takes in knowledge and learns as it goes.…
- 1171 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The existence of God has been a popular and yet ongoing debate for many years now. There are many arguments that argue for God’s existence just as there are many arguments against God’s existence. This paper will argue for the proof of God’s existence according to William Paley’s teleological argument. The teleological argument is often described as an argument which stems from either design or intelligent design, but this can be considered as misleading.…
- 711 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Strong artificial intelligence is the view that suitable programmed computers can understand language and possess the same mental capabilities as humans (Stanford). Weak artificial intelligence is the view that computers are only useful in some areas because they can mimic human mental abilities (Stanford). In 1980 John Searle published “The Chinese Room Argument” to prove that artificial intelligence appears to understand language but it actually does not understand. The argument is set in a scenario in which a computer follows a program written in the computing language. A human types Chinese symbols but does not actually understand Chinese and because the computer does what the human does it does not show understanding of Chinese either. The Turing test was created in 1950 by Alan Turing to deal with the question can machines think. It is also known as the Imitation Game and is comprised of a person, machine and interrogator. The interrogator is in a separate room from the person and the machine and the purpose of the game is for the interrogator to determine which one is the person and which is the machine. The person and the machine are labeled X and Y and the interrogator must ask them questions and the machine is trying to make the interrogator think that it is the person. “I believe that in about fifty years’ time it will be possible to program computers, with a storage capacity of about 109, to make them play the imitation game so well that an average interrogator will not have more than 70 percent chance of making the right identification after five minutes of questioning. I believe that at the end of the century the use of words and general educated opinion will have altered so much that one will be able to speak of machines thinking without expecting to be contradicted” said Turing (Stanford). The test may not be good because it only bases intelligence off of being able to…
- 2388 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
a. The warrant made in this essay isn’t a very clear one. The author never clearly states in the essay whether or not he believes the internet is making us smarter. He goes on to explain that there are a lot of things that the internet allows us to do however, when comparing between things that are beneficial and not so beneficial, the things people create with the internet that aren’t very beneficial tend to catch on a lot quicker in society.…
- 688 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The design argument, also known as the argument of teleology, is the argument for the existence of God, or some kind of intelligent creator. Derived from the Greek word ‘telos’ meaning end or purpose, it is an a posteriori argument, because it is based on experience, not on reason or revelation, using the surroundings of the world as supporting evidence. The argument is an inductive one, as its reasoning can give way to many conclusions, and because it is based on experience it is measurable and artificial. There are two main arguments that philosophers have used for Design, qua (relating to) regularity and qua purpose.…
- 462 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
These three main arguments include the ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments. The teleological argument has evolved from antiquity and has been termed the physico-theological argument, argument from design, intelligent argument design, and the fine-tuned universe argument. The basic concept of the argument states that the world shows evidence of a designer because of its perfection, harmony, and consistency. The World Library defines teleological as:…
- 2343 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The argument from design, otherwise known as the teleological argument, is an argument for the existence of God based upon the empirical evidence of the design of nature. The argument form design is considered as part of Natural theology. Defined Natural theology is a set of arguments that argue for the existence, in which their aim is not presuppose a belief in God, but rather have their starting point with the existence of the world, the order and purpose in the world and the concept of God. Respectively, the names of these arguments are the Cosmological argument, the design argument and the Ontological Argument. The aim of this essay shall be to assess the successfulness of the design argument.…
- 1305 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The second reason is that the human machine lacks a rational soul. So even though they might be able to do certain tasks as well or better as humans, the machine can only do those tasks. They lack knowledge; they can only do what they are programmed to do. Animals are the same as their machine, because they act through the disposition of their organs. They don’t think, they eat when their stomach tells them too, sleep when their brain tells them to, and urinate when their bladder tells them too. An animal machine with these same organs would act in the same way as the animal. While a rational human would be able to look at a situation and act depending on how they feel. And different people will act in different ways, unlike the machines that will all act the same way.…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
3. Machines are unable to provide a substitute for human intelligence, knowledge, wisdom, organizational abilities and culture.…
- 725 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Harnad, S. (1994) Levels of Functional Equivalence in Reverse Bioengineering: The Darwinian Turing Test for Artificial Life, Artificial Life 1(3): 293–301.…
- 1596 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Can a machine differentiate between right and wrong with its limited understanding of human nature?…
- 1622 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays