Preview

Can We Live with a Nuclear Iran?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Can We Live with a Nuclear Iran?
Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

Can We Live with a Nuclear Iran?

Amyn Jivani

6099660

POL1102 D – Politics and Globalization

Professor: Dr Daniel Pierre-Antoine

Moderator: Dr Daniel Pierre-Antoine

War has commenced since the late 1800’s with over 150 conflicts and 600 battles occurring, and still taking place on a global perspective. People who witness war firsthand tend to feel that the most memorable moments are the moments that people wish to remember the least. The dilemma faced in society currently is the idea of Iran having the capability of possessing a nuclear weapon. Doing so will make them the tenth nuclear power in the world, adding them to a list involving; The United States, Russia, United Kingdoms, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel . The major focus of today’s discussion is on Iran’s pronouncement to go nuclear. The first half of this paper will attempt to depict the pros for Iran receiving a nuke, and the cons of receiving a nuke. This will enable us to gain a non-biased view on the situation in Iran. The second half of this paper will summarize why ‘we’ cannot live with a nuclear Iran.
The core purpose for acquiring nuclear weapons in a society is not to cause violence, but rather deter violence, which is a viable fit to any country using it for those specific purposes. This fact is proven by all the countries that already possess nuclear weapons. These weapons are utilized the same way that bouncers are used at clubs. To secure the vicinity and keep unwanted people out. Keeping this in mind, we must take into consideration the Non-Proliferation Treaty aka NPT. The NPT acts as a repellent of nuclear technology to countries as its primal objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and technology and to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of energy. With these restrictions, only 5 states were recognized as nuclear weapons from the 190 parties that were involved in the NPT. The United States, Russia,



Bibliography: "Can we live with a nuclear-armed Iran? | The Current with Anna Maria Tremonti | CBC Radio." CBC.ca - Canadian News Sports Entertainment Kids Docs Radio TV.  Masur, Louis P.. "The Washington Monthly - The Magazine - We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran." The Washington Monthly.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    In both cases, protagonists were influenced by the particular events, their domestic and geo-political state of affairs and the signals delivered and counter offers made from parties involved. This essay analyses the scenario, role of actors, and description of the outcomes of the two crises. The paper argues that the advent of the nuclear age, following World War II in 1945, shaped contemporary international relations. What makes the Cuban Missile Crisis fundamentally different was precisely because it occurred during nuclear age. This essay will outline some of the concepts such as deterrence, mutual assured destruction doctrine, and the concept of balance of terror to justify why the nuclear age has shaped events after World War II. The essay concludes by affirming the need to rethink and revisit the role of nuclear weapons in the 21st century.…

    • 2601 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of Iran developing a nuclear weapon has undoubtedly sparked up an international debate on both sides of the isle. While many in the west debate about which actions to take to prevent the development of the bomb or if Iran is even developing the bomb other countries like Russian and China have been reluctant to criticize. From a western perspective we have to decide whether or not a patient diplomacy is the best approach to Iran’s nuclear problem or not. The consequences of attacking Iran could prove to be just as disastrous as not attacking Iran and being threatened by ban attack. In “Taking Side” two scholars on this issue debate this very question. Christopher Hemmer, from “Responding to a Nuclear Iran” and Norman Podhoretz, editor-at-large for the opinion journal “Commentary” argue on both sides of the issue. This is a general overview of the situation, a summary of each authors main points and a conclusion based on my own opinion.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crist, David. The Twilight War: The Secret History of America’s Thirty-Year Conflict with Iran. New York: The Penguin Press, 2012.…

    • 7054 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran, as it stated and signed in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, that it would not proliferate while having the right to peacefully use nuclear technology i.e. using nuclear power to generate heat and electricity. Along with signing this treaty Iran along with other signatories received some privileges from the NTP leaders done by providing alternative means of protecting members’ security – namely, enhanced access to conventional arms. However, the issue arose that Iran had secretly, over the past many years; Evidence uncovered by the International Atomic Energy Agency over the past 9 years demonstrates that Iran’s leaders covertly resumed their quest for sensitive nuclear technology during the decade long Iran-Iraq war. This quest continued even after that war, while the Iranians insist that their strife to have a nuclear weapons program is for peaceful purposes only. Although there are many other reasons that would inspire the Iranians to acquire nuclear powers speaking in terms of international affairs. Especially since their biggest “enemy” Israel had not signed the NPT thus excluding them from the obligation not to have nuclear weapons caused a big threat to Iranians, also that the U.S. has these weapons and since relations between the Iranians and them aren’t peachy keen either, Iran would probably feel safer in the international scope and more self reliant if it had nuclear weapons. This entire operation did not sit well with the U.S. who considers Iran to be a major adversary and a cause of danger in the world, especially in the east.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this day and age, many may acknowledge the very controversial issue of technology for peace. This subject is so debated because nuclear weapons have the ability to destroy the world as we know it. However, they are essential if we are to protect ourselves. We need to have them, because almost anybody can gain control of them and become a threat. Mutually Assured Destruction insures that both sides need to have weapons of mass destruction to prevent a nuclear war. The use of human soldiers to make peace is too great a risk, and not worth it. With such treacherous weapons as these, it is crucial that we make all the right decisions, but we must also give the world some credit and acknowledge the fact that people have learnt from their mistakes, like what happened in Japan, and nobody wants that to happen again. It is imperative that we have these arms because the technology is already out there and almost anyone can obtain them, Mutually Assured Destruction insures that as long as both sides have them then nobody will strike, and the risk of human casualties is too great and not worth it.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Educating ourselves on events in world history may not prevent the present and future leaders from making the same mistakes, and neither will it accomplish utter tranquility and peace among all countries. It is however an important tool for us individuals to understand the results of each event, and how they came to shape the structures of nations and their relationships with each other today. The bombing of Hiroshima is an event that has impacted the United States and the world to this day. And thus it is important to understand the different standpoints of why Truman orders the release of the atomic bomb. It is also important to consider the result of the bombing for Japan, the United States and the rest of the…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran’s nuclear program and nuclear weapons have grown exponentially since 2003 threatening Middle-Eastern countries and America. Iran has had a nuclear program since the 1950’s when the U.S. helped launch it as part of the Atoms For Peace program. But since then, the program has grown with out regulation from the I.A.E.A.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second, It was believed that Nuclear weapons are the symbol of power.Many big countries like China, The United States or Russia. They all have them.And that's going to make other small countries want to have them. So they try every way to make nuclear weapons even, they have to lose a lot of money.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I found the book written by Hooman Majd, to be very informative and interesting, as it exposed a new view of a country, that has always been viewed as anti-western, anti-democracy and dictatorial. This reflection paper will take a look at how the book by Hooman Majd, portrays Islamic Republic of Iran, and why the country and Khomeini seem to oppose western influence and democracy. The outside world and many western countries regard Iran as a dictatorial country that wants to disrupt world peace, through the production of nuclear weapons.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Falk, Richard (2012) ‘Kenneth Waltz is not Crazy, but he is Dangerous: Nuclear Weapons in theMiddle East’, Citizen Pilgrimage (6 July), available at http://richardfalk.wordpress.com/2012/07/06/kenneth-waltz-is-not-crazy-but-he-is- dangerous-nuclear-weapons-in-the-middle-east/.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [1] Howlett, Darryl ‘Nuclear Proliferation’ in John Baylis and Steve Smith, The Globalisation of World Politics (Oxford: OUP, 2001, second edition)…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why do these countries feel the need to posses so many nuclear warheads? Dominance, power and paranoia. Although some of their weapons may simply just be left over from the Cold War, this is not an excuse. They could have easily been destroyed by now. Countries like Russia and the United States crave power. In modern times the most important substance to guarantee power is weapons. Countries in possession of nuclear weapons use them to scare and intimidate other nations. One day this could backfire and the consequences would be deadly. Take North Korea and America. When Kim-Jong Un tried to invade South Korea,…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serious failure to protect individuals from abuse occurred in care homes across Britain. This is an account of the shocking state of an elderly care home in Essex. It has shown the residents being abused, bullied and also physical violence being used toward these vulnerable adults. They had been left in their own excrement for hours not taken to bathroom when they needed too.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays