Richard W. Wrangham is a Professor of Biological Anthropology at Harvard University. He had a long term study in Kanyawara chimpanzees and he was well known for his work in the ecology of primate social system. The book Catching Fire refers to the activities of our human ancestors when they began to use fire to practice cooked diet. Although the topic is pretty academic, but Richard used simple sentences and words to explain his ideas well. Yet the proof is still preciseness with provided evidences, and the conclusion is convincible. Hence, this source should be trustable.…
During the breakfast, Smith received a telegram from his childhood estate in Boston. The telegram was from his mother’s staff saying she had fallen critically ill and requesting his immediate return. Smith quickly went to the lobby and asked when the next train to Boston was. Hearing that it wasn’t until 6 am the next morning, Smith began feeling helpless and decided to retire to his third story room. While in the elevator, he lit a cigarette to calm his nerves, not knowing that the pinewood walls had been recently polished. Smith feeling very anxious about his mother’s condition fumbled with his cigarette, and caught it against the wall of the elevator. The freshly polished wood went up in flames at nearly 11 am. Smith and the elevator attendant put forth their best effort to put out the fire but to no avail. Neither survived. The flames soon spread from the elevator shaft to the rest of the Hotel. Only the dining room was left…
In Fires in the Mind, by Kathleen Cushman, a majority of her words were on mastery and motivation of youth. Kathleen spent a great deal of her time questioning children about different aspects of deliberate practice, mastery in/out of school, and what it means to be a master. In her journey to find answers, she found that many kids already practice deliberate practice outside of school in extracurricular activities (sports, crafts, hobbies, etc.) and wanted to see if the same applied to inside school as well. She discovered, through the kid’s words, that they felt they couldn’t practice the same because it was boring, or irrelevant to them. With that in mind, it provoked many ideas on how to build the class to be engaged and motivate them…
Think of the word "fire". What's the first thing that comes to mind? To some it's s'mores, to others it's destruction. For Montag Fire was a tool for his profession; "It was a pleasure to burn. It was a special pleasure to see things eaten, to see things blackened and changed." This line was found in the beginning of a Fahrenheit 451. Montag was in charge of burning the books that were found, but throughout the movie his understanding of fire changed.…
Historically, the Anishinaabe were given certain rights to hunt and fish in northern parts of Wisconsin. Native people used the supply of fish as a way to nourish themselves and their families (p.280). The Anishinaabe people were known for harvesting and making use of everything on their land for food, clothing, and shelter (p. 232). In 1854, the Treaty of LaPointe was created, keeping Indigenous people from using their land to hunt and fish freely. As a result of this, the Anishinaabe people were left amongst the poorest people in North America (p.233).…
When he set the house afire, he “strode in the fireflies.” In this metaphor, the embers of the burning house are said to be fireflies. This example demonstrates how Montag is a zealous arson since he strode with a sense of satisfaction through the embers. Bradbury also claims that Montag “Wanted” to “shove a marshmallow into a furnace.” In this example of a metaphor, the books are said to be marshmallows, and the fire among which everything is burning I said to be the furnace. Through metaphors Montag is proven to be a person who takes pleasure in setting things aflame, because he wants to burn the books. By using metaphors, Ray Bradbury indicates that Montag is fervent man who has strong adoration for destroying…
It’s a normal day, just getting off of work and smelling the perfume. I have loved how the kerosene smells on me. I was a fireman, a fireman who burned books for a living. I followed in my family’s footsteps and became a fireman, that only burnt books. Which soon turned into having to burn buildings because they contained books. Paper burned at 451 degrees fahrenheit. Burning books always seemed to make me happy. Ray Bradbury wanted people to know the good between bad. There were some very nice helpful people in the society along with some people who were mean and rude like Beaty.…
Understanding that fireman set fire instead of putting them out is difficult to comprehend. For instance, in Fahrenheit 451 setting fire to books is a dramatic interpretation which leads to dehumanization. Life of 1953 future was a society of deceit and lacked independence. It was a world without books to read. The author, Ray Bradbury, observed how technology has made people become less human and less capable of independent thought. It was also not normal for pedestrians to talk and have meaningful conversations. Guy Montag, “the fireman that turned sour”, meets Clarisse a curious, yet strange teenage girl that brightens his imagination to help him think and ponder about life. The phrase ,"Are you happy"(Bradbury 10) was the question that changes Montag's perspective on life and helps him to want to alter from book burning. Book burning could be beneficial for the good of technology, some may believe that technology helps with the advantage of medicine and education, however, it can destroy society's social life and how the world will become.…
Ray Bradbury’s protagonist in Fahrenheit 451 revels in seeing things eaten and things blackened by fire. His name is Montag and his world is immersed in flames from the outset, with a blaze so bright before his kerosene spitting python that it blinds. He breathes in fire beneath a flameproof jacket, his burnt-corked countenance expresses fire with a permanent grin “driven back by flame,” while his perfume is the overwhelming stench of kerosene. His existence hinges upon fire so thoroughly that his experiences are defined in its terms. Clarisse, on the other hand, lives under moonlight, atop the grass, and in clothes of white as she radiates fragrances of apricots and strawberries while the wind…
This unspoken life was an afraid-free and joyful life, but due to one man’s malicious acts the whole world was afraid of the “firemen” he founded. These firemen would go to random homes and burn the not only the books but the home and human as well. This fact makes the preservation of knowledge so much more important. It is so important because the survivors of the burnings will go and educate the younger generation about the firemen, what they do, why they burn books, and how they do it. The…
Over time have been enjoying Ta-Nehisi Coates’s writings. Not because he is a Black American but how excellent his essays and blog are in the world that is jammed with skilled critics who are led by ego and their awareness of certain ideas. He had a lot of hardships growing up in the streets of Baltimore. He had to do all he could to avoid all the evil that was served by the world to him. This has made him talk freely without fear of the various facts that need to be understood by the people and the government. As it has always been known that one’s experience shapes his future positively or negatively, Coates life as a youth has made him humble but slightly rebellious.…
In William Faulkner's 1939 short story "Barn Burning," a young boy, Colonel Sartoris Snopes (Sarty), is faced with and forced to endure the abusive and destructive tendencies of his father, Abner Snopes. As the story unfolds, several examples can be found to illustrate Faulkner's use of symbolism to allow the reader to sense the disgust for Abner Snopes, the significance in the lack of color usage throughout the story, and finally, Sarty's journey.…
Bradbury writes, “The wind blew. A failing tree bough crashed through the kitchen window. Cleaning solvent, bottled, shattered over the stove. The room was ablaze in an instant! "Fire!" screamed a voice. The house lights flashed, water pumps shot water from the ceilings. But the solvent spread on the linoleum, licking, eating, under the kitchen door, while the voices took it up in chorus: "Fire, fire, fire!” (Bradbury 3). The author uses symbolism in describing the fire. Not only is the fire destroying the house, but it is also gigantic and is spreading quickly. This fire is used to symbolize the downfall of man. The author also personifies the fire. The solvent that caught fire and caused it to spread quickly was described as “licking”, and “eating” further personifying the fire. The house tries to stop the spread of the fire by spraying a chemical. The house yells “Fire, fire, fire!” because it “feels” as though it is threatened by the fire. The house and fire are personified as being enemies in a constant…
Think back to big firework nights such as Bonfire Night and Ne Year’s Eve – has it often rained the following day? According to some, it does and for many the reason behind the rain isn’t merely a coincidence. They believe it is because of fireworks!…
Rhetorical Analysis: Brit Melville employed personification and contrasting diction to exemplify the unbalanced relationship between the sea and the human race, which established that the sea would forever be unfathomable to landsmen and the landsmen would forever live at it’s mercy; thus warning those ignorant men that the dream of conquering the sea shall remain a dream. Melville portrayed the sea as a godly and omnipotent being, so immensely powerful that “no mercy, no power but its own controls it”. The word “own” embedded here implied that the sea obtained a mind of it’s own, a mind capable of acknowledging emotions and of dictating a brilliant race. By affirming the intellectual and humanistic characters of the sea, Melville informed the citizens clinging onto solid ground that they were far from being qualified for the battle against…