Preview

Caperton v. Massey Case Brief

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Caperton v. Massey Case Brief
Hugh M. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc.
556 U.S.868
U.S. Supreme Court
June 8, 2009

Facts: Hugh Caperton, C.E.O. of Harman mining (here on labeled as Caperton), filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Company (here on labeled as Massey) alleging that Massey fraudulently canceled a coal supply contract with Harman Mining, resulting in its going out of business. In August 2002, a Boone County,West Virginia jury found in favor of Caperton and awarded $50 million in damages. Massey went on to appeal to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. During the interlocutory period Don Blankenship, C.E.O. of A.T. Massey Coal Company was involved in a campaign for the election of State Supreme court candidate Brent Benjamin against incumbent Justice Warren McGraw. Blankenship invested over $3 million in Benjamin's campaign through a non-profit organization called "And For The Sake of The Kids". Mcgraw lost to Benjamin in November 2004. When the case came before the West Virginia Supreme Court in 2007 the court ruled in favor of Massey and overturned the $50 million verdict in a split 3 to 2 decision. Caperton sought rehearing and the parties moved for disqualification of three of the five justices who decided the appeal. Photos had surfaced of Justice Spike Maynard vacationing in the French Riviera while the case was pending. Justice Maynard recused himself after possible bias due to friendship was brought into argument. Next, Blankenship petitioned for Justice Larry Starcher's recusal after the two shared a public feud over Blankenship's role in the 2004 elections. Caperton petitioned for the recusal of Justice Benjamin because of Blankenship's monetary contributions to his election campaign. Justice Benjamin declined, but Caperton was given a rehearing. In April 2008, the court again ruled in favor of Massey with Benjamin again joining the 3-2 majority. Caperton filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court concerning Blankenship's contributions

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: On March 20, 1982, plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sustained serious injuries while skiing at Jimmy Peak Ski Resort. On December 5, 1984 plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sued defendant Jimmy Peak. Plaintiff alleged that her injuries were caused by defective ski equipment she had rented from the rental facility on the premises. She further alleged that the defendant failed to inspect ski equipment and the failure amounted to negligence and breach of contract. An amended complaint was filed on February 14, 1986, the plaintiff added counts that the defendant had breached warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The defendant moved for summary judgment which was granted by a judge of the Superior Court on the ground that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. The case was transferred to Massachusetts’s Supreme Court by its own motion.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cadia Case Analysis

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    [ 5 ]. Wade v New South Wales Rutile Mining Co Pty Ltd (1969) 121 CLR 177 at 186.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Keller v. Inland Metals All Weather Conditioning, Inc. Inland Metals did have an express warranty with the humidifier it sold to Keller. According to NOLO (2015) “an express warranty is a verbal or written statement that guarantees that a product is of a certain quality or will work in a certain way or for a certain amount of time.” In the case of Keller v. Inland Metal, Inland Metals provided both verbal and written statements about the quality of the humidifier they sold the Keller’s and that the humidifier would perform a certain way. Inland Metals met with the Kellers and sent the Kellers a letter discussing the humidifier and how it will handle their needs and reduce odors and humidity from their pool.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robey v. Hinners Brief

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 2005, Robey who runs his business in Sikeston, Missouri sold a used 2002 Cadillac Escalade to a Kentucky resident, Hinner, over ebay auction. As Robey advertised, the car was “clean, better and average” and with an “ 1 month/1,000 mile Service Agreement”. After Hinner bought the car, he realized that the car was not as advertised. Robey argued that since he was not a resident, and the lack of personal jurisdiction that he should be dismissed.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada, 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One of the most significant court decision is Miller Vs State Supreme Court of Nevada, 1996 991 P.2d 1183.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. McCleskey was a Black man, that was convicted of two counts armed robbery and one count of murder in the Supreme Court of Fulton County, Georgia. His convictions were due to the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer while the robbery was occurring. There was evidence presented at trial that proved one of the bullets to be from a .38 caliber Rossi revolver, which fit the description of the gun McCleskey was carrying, and two witnesses who had heard McCleskey had admitted to the shooting.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    s. 2 (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mann vs. Ford

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In late 1960’s Ford bought a large sum of land in Ramapough, New Jersey to build a factory for their car assembly. With all the production going on they had ton’s upon tons of waste. Since Ford owned a large area of land they found wooded areas to dump the waste they had created and they felt it was fine because they paid for the land. Even though Ford bought the land from a Native American tribe, some of those Indians still lived on the land.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, Congress may charter a bank as an implied power under the "necessary and proper" clause.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts of the Case: LaNisa Allen appealed the original judgment in favor of Totes/Isotoner Corporation on the issue of whether the Ohio Fair Employment Practices Act, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, prohibits an employer from discriminating against a female employee because of or on the basis of lactation. Relevant law associated includes whether Allen established a prima facie case of “sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy,” or whether she “was simply and plainly terminated as an employee at will for taking an unauthorized, extra break.” Allen’s original complaint was termination attributable to discrimination, based on pregnancy and related conditions, even though Isotoner claimed to have released her for failure to “follow directions.” Evidence admitted in Allen’s disposition of taking unauthorized breaks for a two week period, which constituted the failure to follow directions, confirmed the trial courts summary judgment. As the trial court granted judgment to Isotoner, the Twelfth District Court of Appeals followed suit, as Allen admitted to ignoring directions and failed to establish a prima facie case of sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy and it’s after effects.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V. Garner

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On October 3, 1974, Memphis Police Officers Hymon and Wright were dispatched to answer a "prowler inside call." When the police arrived at the scene, a neighbor gestured to the house where she had heard glass breaking and that someone was breaking into the house. While one of the officer radioed that they were on the scene, the other officer went to the rear of the house hearing a door slam and saw someone run across the backyard. The suspect, Edward Garner stopped at a 6-feet-high fence at the edge of the yard and proceeded to climb the fence as the police officer called out "police, halt." The police officer figured that if Garner made it over the fence he would get away and also "figured" that Garner was unarmed. Officer Hymon then shot him, hitting him in the back of the head. In using deadly force to prevent the escape of Garner, Hymon used the argument that actions were made under the authority of the Tennessee statute and pursuant to Police Department policy. Although the department's policy was slightly more restrictive than the statute it still allowed the use of deadly force in cases of burglary. Garner's fathers' argument was made that his son was shot unconstitutionally because he was captured and shot possessing ten dollars that he had stolen and being unarmed showing no threat of danger to the officer. The incident was then reviewed by the Memphis Police Firearm's Review Board and presented to a grand jury of the Federal District Court and the Court of Appeals. Neither of these presentations of the incident took any action.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Harris v. Coweta County, No. 03-15094, 433 F.3d 807 (11th Cir. 2005), cert. granted sub nom., Scott v. Harris, 127 S. Ct. 468 (2006)…

    • 3453 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896, the statement of “separate but equal” was created, preventing African Americans from achieving equality. In 1951 in Topeka, Kansas, a girl named Linda Brown was forbidden from attending Summer Elementary school, which was the school closest to her home, due to the color of her skin and was instead forced to go to a school for African American children much farther away. With the help of the NAACP, the National Association of the Advancement of Colored People, and Thurgood Marshall, her father, Oliver Brown, filed a lawsuit against the Topeka Board of Education. The Court spent four terms making their final decision, which came in 1954, banning segregated schools and getting rid of the whole “separate…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Garner v. Tennessee

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Tennessee statute under authority of which police officer fired fatal shot was unconstitutional because it authorized use of deadly force against apparently unarmed, non dangerous fleeing suspect;…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constructive Discharge

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dempsey, G. E. & Petsche, J. N. (2006, August 01). Constructive discharge. Library Law, Retrieved from http://nsls.info/articles/detail.aspx?articleID=80…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays