Preview

Capital Punishment Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
678 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment Essay
Today crime has become part of our daily lives. We live in a society where the legal system sympathizes with criminals and neglects to protect the safety and welfare of the innocent. Studies show that prison overcrowding due to countries not adopting a more capital punishment approach now exceeds in atleast 114 countries and this number is still expected to grow. Twenty four national prison systems hold more than double their capacity, with a further 27 countries holding between 150 and 200 per cent more. I do not advocate death penalty for everybody. A person, who stole bread from a grocery store in order to survive, definitely does not deserve the death penalty. However, a serial killer, who kills people for his own sick twisted agenda, definitely deserves to be punished. As a society we are responsible for upholding our moral code and I support capital punishment because I believe in justice no matter who it is for or against, and protecting the innocent.

We live today in fear amongst criminals. One of the men that walk free today due to an anti- capital punishment approach is Mr. Valjakkala who stole a bike in 1992, when the owner of the bike and his son chased him down, Valjakkala shot and killed the 2 men, doubled back and killed the man's wife. While in prison, he escaped 4 times and 19 years into his life sentence was released on parole. Shortly after, he was caught stealing a car and thrown back into jail only to be released a year later. Don’t the members of this murdered family deserve closure? Where is the justice? Some people might think that death penalty is inhuman and barbarous, but ask those people who have lost their beloved or whose lives have been tied to a hospital bed because of some barbarous person. I am sure they would be very unhappy to see the person who ruined their lives just getting a few years of imprisonment or mere rehabilitation. Consider the example of the rapist and killer. Now, suppose the woman raped was your wife, sister, or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    pre ap reasearch paper

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “When someone commits a felony, it is a matter of free will. No one is compelled to commit armed robbery, murder, or rape. The average citizen does not have the mind or intentions to become a killer(Ornellas).” This statement by Lori Ornellas, a victim in the brutal murder of her nephew shows us that when someone commits a crime they do it on their own account. In the United States today more than six thousand murder investigations a year go cold or go unsolved(Rein). This means that there are so many murders that get away and are not held accountable for the crimes that they have committed. Today in our society capital punishment is a form of punishment that is implemented in our justice system. Capital punishment should stay implemented in our justice system because, the death penalty can serve as a deterrent for violent crimes, the death penalty is morally permissible in today’s society, and under our Constitution the death penalty legally permissible.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are not many absolute truths in the world. Almost every point can be argued and justified. But if there is one truth universally recognized, one truth upon which societies the world over have been based on, it is that murder is wrong. The willful termination of a life is immoral. If we as a society accept that to be true, how then can we condone the death penalty? How is government sanctioned murder a moral option? The legal system is not fool proof, nothing man-made is. How then can we claim that an imperfect court of law, pervious to human error and persuasion, has the power to lay down the most perfectly irreversible solution of them all: death. Even after the appellate courts have been exhausted, it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime they did not do. If there is even that small possibility, how can we, in all good conscious, make it legal to put someone to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    It’s so hard to say where I stand with the death penalty. There are those moments when a person commits a crime so heinous you’re in that state of mind of wanting the death penalty for them. But then you realize this is a human being. I truly do not believe in the death penalty. To me, I think executing someone for a various form of wrongdoing would not punish them. Instead I think that’s just taking them out of their misery. The punishment for doing something wrong that is, for that the person committing such an act, should not be killed but put through suffering by living in jail for the rest of their life. It’s tough, and honestly people have their opinions and it’s in their right to go with or without the death penalty. Capital punishment is one of life 's topics that leave many divided opinions due to its risqué nature. It has been a subject full of controversy for centuries and still continues to be discussed to this day. Throughout my piece I will explain the case that is pro Capital Punishment, as well as the contrasting side - the opposition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dying is a horrifying topic, and death is a scary issue. None of us want our love ones dead, but what happens if they are murdered or run over by a reckless drunk driver? Should all these killers pay the price for what they did by going to prison? Or should their live be terminated as a consequence for their actions? This is a hot issue of whether we should keep the capital punishment or abandon it. When serial killers are committing a crime they never think of themselves as being the victim of death someday. Capital punishment is one of the many ways to teach murderers that for every action there is a consequence. Everyone has the right to live. No one has the right to take another human's life just because he feels like doing so. These murderers should be punished, with the penalty of death, because the death penalty not only values people's life but also shows justice under democracy.…

    • 596 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his book” Should we Execute Those Who Deserve to Die?” Stephen Nathanson defines what he calls “argument from desert” the reasoning that “murderers deserve to die and therefore that the state ought to execute them”. He also proposes two statements, and explains that if one of the two statements could be established, then the argument from desert fails (Nathanson, 1987). In my essay, I will assess and establish one of the statements that Nathanson proposes to invalidate the argument from desert.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is an issue that has been used to handle severe crimes in nearly every country either now or in the past. Even though I understand both sides of capital punishment, I can not morally say that it's good. Though many say that the death penalty is the only way to go , it can not be justified because it is not morally correct to punish people with death.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment falls in three of the objectification properties. Those three are denial of autonomy, violability, and lastly, ownership. Let’s beginning with denial in autonomy. Denial of autonomy is defined as the treatment a person as lacking autonomy and self determination, in other words the person denied to make decisions on their own. In capital punishment, the individual who is being sentence to “death” is being denied their right to live. They are denied their autonomy. Although, it was discussed in class that too much autonomy is not a good thing, I find this case to immorally wrong.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass serial killers such as Charles Manson, Gary Ridgeway, and Dennis Radar are still serving their life sentences for their crimes they committed many years ago. These three men are a known as a few of the most notorious killers to walk this earth. They’re responsible for hundreds of deaths of innocent people. However, criminals that commit horrendous acts of crime continue to live alone in a maximum security prison cell away from other inmates to ensure their safety. Without the use of the death penalty, these criminals never feel the pain they deserve to feel. Serial killers roam the streets of the U.S, killing victims each day all the while knowing their punishment for this crime won’t result in the loss of their own life. Unfortunately, life in prison allows horrible people to live their life out in good living conditions, perhaps even better than how they were living as a member of society. While some citizens are against the death penalty, I believe it gives families closure for the loss of their loved ones. If someone takes the life of an innocent person, it is only right they receive the same punishment their victims endured.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty was used as the ultimate punishment in the American courts, but is it necessary now? The death sentence is used when the offender killed another person with undisputed evidence. The death penalty was used more often during the early years of the United States and is even more accurate now. Even with all the modern technology we have today the death penalty is still hindered by a few factors. Death on humans is immsensely inhumane, even animals are killed at ease with no pain. The death penalty should be used less because of the murder rates are slowly dropping, Prejudice against the defendants, and the costs of the death sentence.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry James meant well when he regarded the confidant to be “the reader’s friend as the protagonist.” In the novel Crime and Punishment, the main character Raskolnikov, is faced with self-faulted situations which progress him towards a confession to his confidante, Razumikhin. Fyodor Dostoyevsky not only chose Razumikhin for reasons pertaining to Raskolnikov, but to add a character that glimpses into the aspects of humanity. He tries to stance with the fact that even if Raskolnikov is a murderer, he needs to share his burden knowing Razumikhin will act humanely. Also, Razumikhin gives priority to friendship, shows devotion to a family related to the criminal and provides facility of a doctor when Raskolnikov is ill.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty Essay

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I do not believe that the death penalty is the most effective way to deal with criminals, because there are alternatives to the death penalty and it is not necessarily cost effective.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The most severe form of punishment of all legal sentences is that of death. This is referred to as the death penalty, or "capital punishment"; this is the most severe form of corporal punishment, requiring law enforcement officers to actually kill the offender. It has been banned in numerous countries, in the United States, however an earlier move to eliminate capital punishment has now been reversed and more and more states are resorting to capital punishment for such serious offenses namely murder. "Lex talionis", mentioned by the Bible encourages "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" mentality, and people have been using it regularly for centuries. We use it in reference to burglary, adultery, and various other situations, although, some people enforce it on a different level, some people use it in reference to death. An individual may steal from those who have stolen from him/her, or an individual wrongs those who have wronged him/her, but should an individual have the right to kill to seek retaliation? Four issues are on the hot topic in the United States, stirring up America's feelings towards this issue. There is controversy debating capital punishment today and whether or not it works, or if it is morally right. We have a certain privilege in our own lives, but should the lives of others belong to us as well. Do we have the right to decide on the lives of others, of people we may not even know? If we find someone guilty of murder, we sentence him to death. This makes us murders ourselves, but is there possibility in justifying these acts?…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays