Preview

Capital Punishment: for and Against

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment: for and Against
Capital Punishment: For and Against

Thesis One: In principle a case can be made on moral grounds both supporting and opposing capital punishment. Thesis two: Concretely and in practice, compelling arguments against capital punishment can be made on the basis of its actual administration in our society.

Two different cases can be made. One is based on justice and the nature of a moral community. This leads to a defense of capital punishment. The second is based on love and the nature of an ideal spiritual community. This leads to a rejection of capital punishment. A central principle of a just society is that every person has an equal right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Within that framework, an argument for capital punishment can be formulated along the following lines: some acts are so vile and so destructive of community that they invalidate the right of the perpetrator to membership and even to life. A community founded on moral principles has certain requirements.
The right to belong to a community is not unconditional. The privilege of living and pursuing the good life in society is not absolute. It may be negated by behavior that undermines the nature of a moral community. The essential basis on which community is built requires each citizen to honor the rightful claims of others. The utter and deliberate denial of life and opportunity to others forfeits ones own claim to continued membership in the community, whose standards have been so flagrantly violated. The preservation of moral community demands that the shattering of the foundation of its existence must be taken with utmost seriousness. The preciousness of life in a moral community must be so highly honored that those who do not honor the life of others make null and void their own right to membership. Those who violate the personhood of others, especially if this is done persistently as a habit must pay the ultimate penalty.
This punishment must be inflicted for the sake of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    members to adhere to their personal opinions and agendas. I have personally felt the wrath of having…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study 1- Question 1: “What legal principles are involved in this case? How do they apply? Does James have a strong case? Why or why not?”…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over whether or not capital punishment should be used has gone on for thousands of years. Although the method of capital punishment has changed the idea of it has not. Capital punishment will always have its disadvantages and its advantages. There has always been an intense debate among the people regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. In my opinion, capital punishment should only be used in harsh cases that the convicted person is proven guilty in.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The “death penalty” is currently utilized in thirteen states throughout the United States. There are currently 3,242 people sitting on “death row” and 43 of those are currently incarcerated here in Nevada. The death penalty is nothing new. Everyone has either read about or watched movies of people having their heads chopped off during medieval times, hangings during western times and one of the most severe executions throughout the ages is that of the crucifixions during the time of Christ. Then there were the executions that few have been aware of and are most likely one of the cruelest of all were the ones of a person convicted of patricide. They would be “tied to a sack with a cockerel, a poisonous snake and a dog, and then thrown into the river, or sea.” (Jerome, 2012).…

    • 4499 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is a moral controversy in today’s society. It is the judicial execution of criminals judged guilty of capital offenses by the state, or in other words, the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws can date back to the Eighteenth Century B.C. and the ethical debates towards this issue have existed just as long. There is a constant pro-con debate about this issue, and philosophers like Aristotle and Mill have their own take on this controversy as well. Aristotle is against capital punishment, while Mill believes it is morally permissible.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has pros and cons. Some of the pros of the death penalty are that it frees more space for incoming prisoners, therefore we can pay less taxes. The amount of space taken from prisoners who have a life sentence take up to much space and the death penalty would prevent that from happening. The cost of the death penalty is dramatically lower then the cost of the sentence “Life Without Parole” JFA [Justice for All] estimates that life without parole cases will cost $1.2 million-$3.6 million more than equivalent death penalty cases. There is no question that the up front costs of the death penalty are significantly higher than for equivalent life without parole cases. There also appears to be no question that, over time, equivalent life without parole cases are much more expensive... than death penalty cases. Opponents ludicrously claim that the death penalty costs, over time, 3-10 times more than life without parole. The death penalty would possibly make people afraid to commit a felony because they might be punished with the ultimate punishment… Death.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If we want to fully understand morality we must analyse the meaning of the key moral terms used, what it means, what it does and how it may be verified. Take the word ‘good’; we may describe it in an absolute way, “this is a good essay” or in a relative way, “compared to the previous one, this essay is good”. Or in a utilitarian way, “this essay will get a good result” However none of these uses or descriptions actually tell us what the word good means.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A punishment is the negative consequence forced upon someone by a group or person. Normally a punishment is a consequence of a rule being broken. A rule is any type of vehicle, or guide to ensure certain actions or behavior. Rules are often just written or spoken, and provide guidelines for human activity. A rule is made by higher authority, like a Parent, King, Minister, Dictator, or a Teacher. Rules are enforced with punishments, to deter people from breaking them. Besides punishments being used to deter people; they could also be used to isolate, retribution, and rehabilitate criminals. The question that is related to this essay is; what was the goal of older punishment and what is the goal of modern punishment?…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The use of technology in conjunction with scientific forensics has changed much of the way in which cases are handled, reducing, if not nearly eliminating, wrongful convictions (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015). Certainly, I can see why you feel so strongly about taking the stance you have with regards to the death penalty. Consequently, I place my faith in the criminal justice system to carry out each investigation to avoid false convictions, moreover, I do support the death penalty in capital cases. Although the cost associated with the prosecution of the offender are significantly higher than that of a regular murder trial that would not sentence the offender to death, the cost of housing the offender for life would be much higher. Incarcerated…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Activity 1

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page

    What do you consider to be the ethical basis for the statement, “Our ability to selectively engage and disengage our moral standards . . . helps explain how people can be barbarically cruel in one moment and compassionate in the next.” Do you believe the statement is a sound statement, why or why not? Explain your answer using material in Chapter 1.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are few policies that produce as much debate, controversy and emotion in this country as the death penalty. Capital punishment has been around in this country since colonial times when people were killed for practicing witchcraft and today the death penalty is legal in 31 states. Since 1976, 1414 people have been executed in the U.S. (deathpenaltyinfo.org). People who favor capital punishment believe that if someone brutally take's another person's life then they should lose their own right to life. However, in taking a closer look at the death penalty, there are many problems associated with it such as that is is morally wrong, the botching of executions, the execution of innocent people, and the fact that it is a flawed system…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yet, many find good acts those which enhance the utility of society, regardless of potential harm, diminished personal happiness, or renouncement…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    III. [Thesis] Today I hope persuade you that the Death penalty should be legalized. First I will persuade you by showing how it help deter one from committing…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays