Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Capital Punishment is a Necessary Evil: Should We Move to More Humane Methods?

Good Essays
878 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment is a Necessary Evil: Should We Move to More Humane Methods?
“Capital Punishment is a Necessary Evil”
Oppose

Head of the English Department, Mrs. Daria Sorhaindo, class teacher of form 4-C, Mrs. Sarah Douglas-Perez and my fellow classmates. My group members Jaide Phillip, Sinead Stephen, Kelly-Ann Liverpool, Maya Reid and myself, Iyka Dorival bid you a warm good afternoon. Today, my group will express our views on capital punishment. Is it a form of punishment that is a truly necessary in our society? Or should we move to more humane methods?

Is capital punishment truly a necessary evil? Capital punishment also known as the death penalty is the legal authorized killing of someone as punishment for crime. I strongly believe that it is not a necessary evil and it is wrong. No civilized country should have the power to kill their own citizens. Telling people not to kill by killing people, isn't really a great example, it is rather morally hypocritical. The death penalty violates religious views, it is not a deterrent for other crimes, and it is more costly than profitable.

Firstly, there have been ongoing arguments among Christians both for and against the death penalty as many believe that only God should create and destroy life, while others believe that those who kill should get a taste of their own medicine. In the article Catholicism and Capital Punishment (April 2001), Cardinal Dulles states that in the old testament days, “in his covenant with Noah, God laid down the principle, ' whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image'” (Genesis 9:6). In today's society, the same principle seem to be taken for granted, but Jesus, himself, in the New Testament, refrains from using violence. He rebuked his disciples for wishing to call down fire from heaven to punish the Samaritans for their lack of hospitality (Luke 9:15) and he admonished Peter to put his sword in the scabbard rather than resist arrest (Matthew 26:52). If we consider Jesus as the embodiment of our Christian faith and we are to follow his example, we should refrain from the using violence as a form of justice.

Secondly, it is evident that the death penalty is definitely not a deterrent for crime. In the United States of America, statistics show that states which have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than the states without these laws. Most people on death row commit their crimes in the heat of passion or under the influence of drugs. The idea that the death penalty has the power to stop murder, is naïve and clearly proven false by the facts. In a 2008 survey, police chiefs from North Carolina ranked the use of the death penalty at the bottom of a list of effective crime fighting tools. They said more law enforcement resources were the most needed tool for reducing violent crimes.

Thirdly, Capital punishment is more costly for any government or state than life imprisonment. This is due to the long and complex judicial process for capital cases that the court must go through. Tax payers pay $90,000 more per death row prisoner than on the regular inmate confinement. By replacing capital punishment with permanent imprisonment, the government will save over half a million in five years or more. The average capital punishment case cost $1.26 million. This is due to the pre-trial and trial costs, automatic appeals and trial petitions that all takes 3-5 times longer than a typical criminal case.
Some will say that a murderer's actions are irreversible and that such a crime deserves an equal punishment. These same enthusiasts would support their claims by citing the biblical passage that exorts "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." However, if a crime deserves an equal punishment, then why do we not rape the rapist or burn the arsonist? A civilized society should be based on values and principles that are higher than those it condemns. We cannot deny the fact that to punish murders with death is inherently contradictory; because biblically we are called to live by higher values. In Matthew 5: 38-41, Jesus said we may have heard it been said an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth but he instructed us to turn the other cheek. He further admonishes us to love even our enemies, refrain from killing and that we should not place ourselves in the position of God by judging others. I must reiterate that vengeance and retribution are to be left to God, who is the only one with the perfect capabilities of judgment. Capital punishment is undoubtedly extreme and unequal to any crime.

Conclusively, Capital Punishment is immoral and a violation of natural rights. It violates religious view, it is not a deterrent to other crimes and it is more costly than profitable. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for innocent victims, it does not follow the goals and principles of nations, it does not effectively deter crimes and it does not give closure to victims' families. Nothing good comes out of hate, and nothing good can come from Capital Punishment. Simply put Capital Punishment CANNOT be morally justified.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Should the death penalty be banned as a form of punishment? Balanced Politics (https://www.balancedpolitics.org/death_penalty.htm) illustrates proponents and opponent’s points of views. Select adversary viewpoints say “Financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is several times that of keeping someone in prison for life. It is barbaric and violates the "cruel and unusual" clause in the Bill of Rights. The endless appeals and required additional procedures clog our court system. Society needs to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge mentality if civilization is to advance.” Some death penalty advocates say “The death penalty gives closure to the victim's families who have suffered so much. It creates another form of crime deterrent. Justice is better served. Our justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims.” https://www.balancedpolitics.org/death_penalty.htm Capital punishment comes with large amounts of gray area, so to say I am personally on one side or the either would be unfair. I believe in moving away from the “revenge mentality.” I also don’t believe murder victim’s families ever receive justice after losing a loved one. The death penalty teaches nothing, it’s just a means to an end. Repeating history lingers until society and law adapt better criminal punishment…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Assignment Crt 205

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital punishment has long been on the chopping block within many forums in America. Most in favor will argue, when considering the most heinous and wicked of crimes, criminals committing these crimes should be put to death. Those opposed will always take the stance that capital punishment is unacceptable in a civilized society in that it is a cruel form of punishment. My stance is one of support for capital punishment in the capacity that it is a necessity in respect to the basic premise of the severity of punishment being weighed against the circumstances of the crime.…

    • 633 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is death penalty? Death penalty is when a state or the government issues the punishment of execution to some one who has committed a crime. It has always been one of the most highly debated issues in the United States. Many Americans are against the capital punishment or commonly knows as the death penalty because they fear its too expensive or there are religious reasons to oppose the death penalty or some other reasons. But my point of view is just like the bible and what it says "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" meaning if you killed some body you ought to be killed also. Most people aren't worried about the life after committing crimes because they know that the laws aren't strict enough to make them to stop committing crimes. To these people, laws don't hold them back from doing what they want to do. Capital punishment is mainly used for murderers and other serious criminals dangerous to our society. People who oppose the capital punishment clearly don't feel the pain and the trouble the victims and their families has gone through. So, is capital punishment necessary? Yes, capital punishment deters crime and gives closure to families of the victim.…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    It’s so hard to say where I stand with the death penalty. There are those moments when a person commits a crime so heinous you’re in that state of mind of wanting the death penalty for them. But then you realize this is a human being. I truly do not believe in the death penalty. To me, I think executing someone for a various form of wrongdoing would not punish them. Instead I think that’s just taking them out of their misery. The punishment for doing something wrong that is, for that the person committing such an act, should not be killed but put through suffering by living in jail for the rest of their life. It’s tough, and honestly people have their opinions and it’s in their right to go with or without the death penalty. Capital punishment is one of life 's topics that leave many divided opinions due to its risqué nature. It has been a subject full of controversy for centuries and still continues to be discussed to this day. Throughout my piece I will explain the case that is pro Capital Punishment, as well as the contrasting side - the opposition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is only an act of vengeance. I am highly against capital punishment. Our constitution is supposed to protect all lives, even the lives of a criminal. Yes terrible and traumatic actions are committed, but it is strongly stated that there is still no right to murder the guilty. The death penalty is actually the most overlooked form of government hypocrisy. Why should the government murder people to show murder is wrong? Will there ever be an actual lesson to learn?…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does killing ever justify murder? Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the act of killing criminals for heinous acts that they’ve committed, generally homicide. I believe that capital punishment is a social injustice because it is unconstitutional and unethical. Those against capital punishment question the surety of the offender’s guilt, economic costs, and the supposedly unbiased judges. There are two sides to every coin though, and there are many reasons to support capital punishment as well. Those who agree with capital punishment argue that it dissuades others from attempting similar crimes and is a fair retribution for lives lost. Of all the varied topics included when discussing capital punishment, one of the most frightening to think about is the possibility that the wrong man may have died.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although many view capital punishment or the death penalty as cruel and unusual punishment it is still strongly used today in the United States. In today’s time people discuss capital punishment when referring to criminals such as the Mason Family, OJ Simpson, Bonnie and Clyde, Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Tedd Bundy, Amy Fisher, and Al Capone who were all hardcore criminals. However not everyone views capital punishments as cruel and unusual, some have religious factors to consider. Most major world religions take a puzzling position on the morality of capital punishment. Religions are often based on a body of teachings the standards of present-day Western civilization, and the Old Testament. A few public…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is viewed as a political viewpoint that has pro’s and con’s by the American people. Capital punishment is known as the “The Death Penalty” and is identified as the premeditated and planned taking of a human life. The government views this as a response to a crime committed by a legally convicted person. The question is The Death Penalty just and applied fairly? The argument against Capital punishment can include the following; Amnesty International, who believes that “The Death Penalty” is the cruelest denial of human, rights (White, 2009). The pro’s state that, “Capital punishment gives society the right and duty to protect the innocent in self-defense.” The Death Penalty gives closure to the victim’s families who have suffered so much. Some families may never recover from the cruelty of the crime, and most families just want closure. Most Americans and people from different countries such as; china, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan agree with capital punishment. White stated, “I believe that it sends the wrong message: Killing people who kill people to show killing is wrong (White, 2009). Therefore, is it just and applied fairly is the question that is asked, should we kill because some kill? I believe that we are sending a message to promote killing, is it fair for some and not for others.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plastic Bags

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is morally impermissible. I know that many believe that criminals responsible for horrific crimes should be punished in proportion to the crime. Criminals do deserve to be punished for such crimes and should face lifetime in jail rather than being killed by the justice system. We should have a consistent respect for life regardless of who it is or what they have done as mentioned in the lecture by Lawrence M. Hinman. All human life is sacred. We can't say it is wrong to kill and then punish by killing in return. If it is wrong to take a way an innocent life then life itself must always be respected by the justice system. Otherwise it is a hypocritical system.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the death penalty has been used in American law enforcement since the Constitution was written, it shouldn’t be accepted as a justified punishment. There are more disadvantages than benefits that come from the death penalty so a life sentence should be the alternative punishment for heinous crimes. The death penalty shouldn’t be used because it is economically and socially unhelpful.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this world of evil and cynical doubt, violence and crimes are lurking in people's ugly heads again. The vicious cycle of crime and punishment retaliates an alarming effect to society's safety. I strongly affirm with my resounding agreement to the establishment of capital punishment to eradicate the increasing occurrences of such heinous crimes.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    dealth penalty

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to my personal feeling, capital punishment should be abolished. This is because it denies people one of the basic rights to live. Every human being is entitled to live. Only God should take ones live since He is the giver of this live. I, therefore, strongly oppose capital punishment (Black, 1999).…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays