According to the case, the carbon-tax and a cap-and-trade system are the best economic tool to employ to reduce emissions. As we know, taxes are the most important expense for a company or firm, if they would emit much more carbon dioxide and other gases, they need to pay more taxes on using carbon recourses. It is stated (Bubna-Litic & Chalifour 2012) that ‘One of the defining features of carbon taxes is that they generate a relatively clear and predictable stream of revenue’. The revenue can be used in many different ways and a key issue is how that revenue is used. For instance, the tax expenditures are aimed at improving energy efficiency and this policy has a regulatory goal of addressing climate change that including gases emission. However, cap-and-trade is also leads to prove the efficiency due to the firms are free to trade. Cleetus (2011) argued that carbon prices adjust in keeping with general economic conditions automatically, and price volatility that could lead to greater uncertainty for business investment decisions. It is also mentioned that a transparent carbon market with good regulation and access to emission and trading data for participants. In a word, carbon taxes focus on taxable regulation for firms and cap-and-trade system concentrate on the monitor of carbon usage and the emission trading.…
Carbon dioxide is naturally present in the atmosphere as part of the Earth 's carbon cycle. Yet human-related emissions are responsible for the increase in CO2 emissions. The use of electricity accounts for 37% of total U.S. emissions, while transportation 31%, industry accounts for 15%, residential and commercial 10%, and other non-fossil fuel combustion 6%. That is 99% of the total globe greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States increased by about 7% between 1990 and 2013. (EPA, 2015) Not leaving out pollution also a contributor of increases in anthropogenic CO2. These things are the cause of the earth heating up, or global warming. Trees and plants help soak up the CO2 in the atmosphere but with the tearing down of trees to build industry buildings, residential and commercial buildings there are fewer trees and plants to take in CO2 for photosynthesis.…
However, since it is primarily the developed countries that are the main cause of the high levels of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere due to their industrial activities spanning more than the past 150 years, the Protocol places higher emissions reduction targets on them under the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" . Today there are 195 parties to the UNFCCC and 192 parties to the Kyoto Protocol.…
• develop standards in the GHG market, including for contracts in carbon trading, the financial accounting of greenhouse gases, and the validation and verification of emission reduction projects;…
So now you might be wondering what a carbon offset is. A carbon offset is a certificate representing the reduction of one metric ton of carbon dioxide emissions, the principle cause of global warming. When you purchase a carbon offset from TerraPass, you purchase three types of projects: clean energy produced by wind power; farm…
Climate change and global warming are important issues that affect everyone on planet earth. The future of our planet is reliant on us solving this issue. Canada has done a lot to be an active contributor to the minimizing this problem such as signing the Paris agreement, which deals with greenhouse gases and emissions mitigation. It is very important for Canada as a developed nation to play a large role in this conversation. Canada may not be number 1 in greenhouse emission but our emission are rather disproportionate to our population in the world. Canada consume more energy than all African nation’s combined. Therefore I believe Canada could be doing more to address this problem. Canada can help reduce carbon emissions by investing and…
Greenhouse gas emissions are important to consider when making global warming policies. Greenhouse gases are the cause of the greenhouse effect on our earth, which leads to the warming of the earth’s surface over time, also know as global warming. Scientists are trying to slow down this process, and, “in February the Kyoto Protocol to reduce global warming took effect, requiring participating countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to below 1990 levels over a five-year…
Recently, the carbon tax issue has been gaining increasing attention in Australia due to its…
Mitigation efforts such as reducing climate change, involve reducing the atmospheric concentration of heat-trapping GHG’s. Reducing the use and source of these gases can do this. The economic approach to mitigating climate change provides economic cues and incentives for the business sector…
Compared to Lesson 2, there is a drastic change in the atmospheric carbon levels. There is almost a 2,000 difference in the carbon levels. However, in Lesson 1, the atmospheric carbon levels are very like Lesson 3. (All in the year 2110)…
The carbon tax could positively influence our society environmentally to further strengthen our future. It encourages alternatives such as public transit, carpooling and even biking due to the elevated gas prices. The tax will also intend for households to not take their electricity for granted and utilize it as a scarce resource. “It increases social efficiency by making people aware of the full social cost” (Pettinger Paragraph 9). This relates back to the Paris Agreement which was signed by the federal government of Canada to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and a carbon tax will be of use in order to achieve the goal. Canadian policies will create incentives to develop low carbon and technology for countries investing in renewable energy. According to Hodgson, “The Conference Board of Canada is conducting research to understand better the low-carbon business and trade opportunities for Canadian firms. Unfortunately, many European countries—and now China—are more advanced in their…
The Governments of Australian and Hong Kong are paying attention to climate change. The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement connected to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). According to UNFCCC (2009), Australia has joined the Kyoto Protocol but Hong Kong has not. “The major feature of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.” (UNFCCC 2009) “Human activities cause an increase in greenhouse gases, mainly through burning of fossil fuels.” (GovHK 2010) Under the agreement, Australia must meet its goal in the national measures. The Kyoto Protocol gives additional suggestions of meeting this goal by setting the Kyoto mechanisms which are: emissions trading, the cleaning development mechanism and joint implementation. (UNFCCC 2009) Two major contributors of greenhouse gases in Hong Kong are power generation and the transport sector. (GovHK 2010) Even though the Hong Kong Government is not a member of the Kyoto Protocol, it has been promoting the use of cleaner fuel and renewable energy got over a decade to reduce the production of greenhouse gases from power generation. (GovHK 2010) The Hong Kong Government has also signed a Memorandum of Understanding with National Energy…
According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the increase in anthropogenic CO2 emissions has led to the increase in global temperatures in the past century . Because of the preponderance of evidence linking greenhouse gases and climate change, governments worldwide are developing policy to reduce CO2 emissions.…
The six GHG are translated into CO2 equivalents in determining reductions in emissions. These reduction targets are in addition to the industrial gases, chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, which are dealt with under the 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone…
Pollution has been one of the big problems of our world. This has pushed many people who are concern enough to create programs that will help reduce the problem and this Smog Merchants article is technically, one of those. But I don’t think marketing the right to pollute will help in any way. It is more like allowing destruction to come to the environment. In this article, it was implied that firms that are able to reduce pollutants below the levels to which it is entitled receives credits, and they can sell these credits to other firms. The thing is that, first, why will you sell pollution rights when the name itself states that you’re giving someone the capability to pollute noted that the problem you are solving is pollution itself. Second, a company who cannot reach the goal tends to buy these credits rather than improving their facility and emissions reductions because it is way cheaper. So how can this help when the only thing it can visibly do is to create firms that are dependent to the credits of other firms that are successful in cutting pollutants in the lowest cost.…