Preview

Case 5.1: Comparing Co- Worker Against Each Other: Dose This Motivate Employees?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
678 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case 5.1: Comparing Co- Worker Against Each Other: Dose This Motivate Employees?
Case 5.1: Comparing Co- Worker against Each Other: Dose this Motivate Employees?

1- What 's your opinion regarding forced ranking performance appraisal? Do they motivate employees? Explain
By implementing a forced ranking procedure, organizations guarantee that managers will differentiate talent. While conventional performance appraisal systems may allow managers to inflate ratings and award Superior ratings to all, a forced ranking system ensures that distribution requirements will be met. Assuming that the system is wisely constructed and effectively executed, a forced ranking system can provide information that conventional performance appraisal systems can 't.
In my opinion, forced ranking performance appraisals is an effective way to judge production. I can see why people are against this method, saying that it kills the morale and that it creates a cut throat environment that doesn 't involve teamwork. But overall it can motivate a person to work harder and to make sure they aren 't in the bottom percentage in the ratio. The system puts employees into different categories: top 20 percent, the middle 70 percent, and the low-performing 10 percent. The managers rank employees against each other and then use the ranking to determine who receives a raise, bonus, promotions, and sometimes who gets fired.
Forced ranking allows the top-ranked employees to be rewarded for their hard work.

2- How would equity theory explain some employees negative reactions to forced ranking? Explain
The equity theory focuses on employees being treated fairly in a work environment. This theory shows how employees react to the forced ranking method. People fill that the ranking method violates employees ' rights. Causing some lawsuits and accusing the employer of discrimination.
The equity theory really shows how losing a promotion and/or raise really affects the employee motivation and commitment to the corporation. Employees want to be treated equally and when they 're

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS 303 Week 3 Assignment

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many organizations - but not all - appraisal results are used, either directly or indirectly, to help determine reward outcomes. That is, the appraisal results are used to identify the better performing employees who should get the majority of available merit pay increases, bonuses, and promotions. By the same token, appraisal results are used to identify the poorer performers who may require some form of counseling, or in extreme cases, demotion, dismissal or decreases in pay. Whether this is an appropriate use of performance appraisal - the assignment and justification of rewards and penalties - is a very uncertain and contentious matter. This is probably what everyone thinks when they hear performance appraisals.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Performance appraisals can increase employee performance and improve the work environment. The performance appraisal is a detailed evaluation of the employee’s job performance. The work standards approach is a performance appraisal in which the evaluator and the staff member care the staff member’s performance to the objectives listed in the job description (Youssef, 2012). Despite the importance of the performance appraisal, both employees and management view the process as frustrating and unfair. This can be attributed to appraisal instruments that are not job related, have a confusing or unclear rating levels. This is viewed as subjective and biased by the employee (Mulvaney, 2012).…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though performance appraisals can be good for the organization, it can also be a controversial management tool. Critics of performance appraisals have many compelling arguments against its use. They can have a false degree of accuracy, engenders dysfunctional employee conflict and competition, assigns an inordinate amount of responsibility to individual with poor work performance. Many will argue that these negative effects of appraisal can be fixed through genuine employee participation.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Siegel Case Summary

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Such systems often include the use of rating or ranking levels in which each employee is positioned. These systems often use quotas to place a part of top performers at the peak level and the worst performers at the bottom level. Such a system is considered to eradicate those within the organization who constantly perform below par. The system is able to work if employees are mindful of the standards for which they are graded in advance, so they can make the required modifications. It can also remove those inside the organization who are either not appropriate for precise jobs or simply lack the skills and abilities to execute their jobs efficiently (Myers,…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The equity theory discusses six different aspects of motivating employees. First, managers need to understand the employee’s perceptions of the idea. The Utah Symphony and The Utah Opera are struggling as separate entities. The arts are trying to save both by merging the two together. Both are very strong in their beliefs that they can function on their own and that if they merge they will lose their individuality. I also believe they believe that one or the other will have more power over the other. (Kreitner, 2009, Organizational Behavior.)…

    • 3777 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    An organization uses a performance management as a tool to examine and evaluate rather and employee’s work behavior is meeting standards. There are job descriptions set for each position within an organization. To measure an employee’s performance, the organization uses a performance appraisal system. This system determines rather the person being appraised will need additional training or, is not right for the position. This paper will discuss an organizations need, as well as purpose for a performance appraisal system. It will also discuss the requirements necessary to have an effective performance appraisal and some of the possible limitations.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appraisal systems in any organization should be designed to motivate and encourage employees to give their best performance. The targets…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Again Performance Appraisals are a great tool when used correctly. Managers must take them seriously and evaluations’ should be accurate. “Before the PA program is up and running, a performance appraisal form should be designed with input from managers. It should be able to sufficiently measure performance, be simple enough for all employees to complete, and not take more than an hour to finish. In implementing the PA program, top management should give the plan its blessing; employees should understand how it works, and the staff at large should be encouraged to view the program as a valuable human resources tool (The Importance of Having a Performance Appraisal Program, Part I,”…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business 110

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The equity theory is a theory of motivation based on the premise that people are motivated to obtain and preserve equitable treatment for themselves. According to the theory everyone establishes their own level or equitability, based on what they see around them. Our perception is an input to outcome ratio.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Performance appraisal is considered a key tool for managerial needs of today’s organizations and is the process by which organizations evaluate job performance. A performance appraisal system usually requires a manager to rate each employee’s performance according to performance criteria’s that have already been established over a period of time. Performance appraisal systems also provide a basis for planning improvement as well as means for determining merit increases, transfers and even dismissals. The most important purpose or goal of the appraisal is to improve performance and hence productivity in the future. Performance appraisals allow employees to see where they are at and managers can get valuable information from employees to help them make employee's jobs more productive. As a result of appraisals, managers’ control over work and results may increase, problems can be identified early, employees are motivated by being allowed to input into and own their objectives, enhances communication, objective feedback given back to employees, facilitates decision making in regard to pay scale and promotion, centralized record of performances.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The general function of performance management systems in organizations is for employers to manage employees’ performance and development by providing individual feedback on their performance evaluation to identify and plan measurable areas for personal development to ensure the organization’s strategic goals are being met (DeCenzo and Robbins, 2007). For years, many organizations provided appraisal type performance reviews to their employees that ranked them against other employees. This type of ranking system is problematic, as it is unfair to compare employees from different departments who’s primary goals may be different from one another and can viewed as putting down employees who may be unable to put in as many hours or as much effort as others who have only one set project at a time and can bog down to set higher numbers. If employee development is not properly measured and managed, the organization may find it difficult to meet their strategic goals. This in turn can create complications between mainstream workers and management, as well as the company, and their customers.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward E. Lawler III brings up some good points in his article, “Eliminating Performance Appraisals”. He speaks of how appraisals can cause employee dissatisfaction, opportunity for a potential law suit and can even lead…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Performance Appraisal

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages

    An elemental, and the most common problem, is that the appraisal process is used for a variety of conflicting purposes (Strebler et al. 2001; Wilson 2002).Performance appraisal can be used to motivate employees to improve their performance by ascertaining clear objectives for future and also letting them know what is expected out of them. This is completely in contrast with the appraisal system that concerns distribution of rewards based on assessment of past performance. In this type of performance appraisal the appraiser is forced to…

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CASE 7

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. The Equity theory best applies because the manager brought himself out of the supervisor role and did exactly what his employees were doing but for a much higher pay. The employees lose respect for him in the long run and almost feel cheated because they are doing the exact same thing for less pay than the manager.…

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Distorted performance ratings are an unwanted common occurrence with most performance management systems (Aguinis, 2013). Since many performance management driven by people, distorted ratings whether inflated or deflated will oftentimes be the result of human intervention. This means that rating deflation is an intentional act on behalf of the person evaluating the employee achieve a certain agenda or goal (Wang,Wong & Kwong, 2010). The motivation of the rater to achieve a certain goal for the outcome of the performance evaluation ties directly with that individual’s motivated to deflated the performance rating (Murphy, Cleveland, Skattebo & Kinney, 2004). If the supervisor’s goal or intent is to disciple, force an employee to resign, or build a case to terminate an employee, the supervisor can use to the performance appraisal process as a tool. The supervisor will be motivated to deflate the scores of employees that feel like are poor performers and want to make the employee react through the performance management process will use rating deflation. Rater deflation can only be mitigated not completely prevented. One way to lessen the effect of ratings deflation is to set an overall performance evaluation goal (Kin Fai Ellick & Kwong, 2007). If the team’s goal is above average, the rater will try to…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics