Preview

Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
20406 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA

CASE NO: CC113-2013
DATE: 2014-09-11, 12

In the matter between
THE STATE and OSCAR LEONARD CARL PISTORIUS

Accused

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE MASIPA

ASSESSORS:

ADV J HENZEN DU TOIT
ADV T MAZIBUKO

ON BEHALF OF THE STATE:

ADV GERRIE C NEL
ADV ANDREA JOHNSON

ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENCE:

ADV BARRY ROUX SC
ADV KENNY OLDWAGE

INTERPRETERS:

MS F HENDRICKS
JUDGMENT
VOLUME 42 (Page 3280 - 3351) iAfrica Transcriptions (Pty) Ltd

1ST Floor Office F112
Momentum Building, 329 Pretorius Street
Pretoria, 0001
Tel: (012) 326-1881 / Fax: (086) 409 8557 www.iafricatranscriptions.co.za CC113/2013-mb
2014-09-11

3280

JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
CASE NO: CC13/2013
DATE: 2014-09-11
2014-09-12

In the matter between
THE STATE and OSCAR LEONARD CARL PISTORIUS

Accused

JUDGMENT

MASIPA J:

In 2013 the accused stayed at house number 286

Bushwillow Street, Silverwoods Country Estate, Silver Lakes. The house with a double storey with the main bedroom on the first floor, the accused slept in the main bedroom which had en suite facilities, that is a bathroom and a toilet.
To reach the bathroom from the main bedroom one had to walk through a passage, although there was no door separating the main bedroom. From the bathroom there was a door to the toilet that opened to the outside that is into the bathroom. The toilet was a small cubicle.

iAfrica Transcriptions (Pty) Ltd / hvr

CC113/2013-mb
2014-09-11

3281

JUDGMENT

The main bedroom had a sliding door that led onto a balcony. There were blinds on the windows and thick curtains which hung on the windows and the sliding door. When the blinds were closed and the curtains were drawn, the main bedroom was dark.
On 13 February 2013 the accused spent the evening in his home with his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp. In the early morning hours

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the fall of 1977, Michael Stephens, sole proprietor of Stephens Construction, asked Warren Sanders, a local real estate broker, to find a large piece of land that would be suitable for development into a single family residential project. Sanders located several parcels and found a homestead staked and owned by Robert and Arlene Cross. Sanders contacted and met with Robert Cross in February of 1978 and stated that he was looking for land for a developer and had asked Cross to sign a listing agreement, but he refused. In September of 1978, Anders contacted Cross again and showed an offer from Stephens. Cross rejected this and two following offers.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think that the owner does need to know a medium amount of knowledge because he needs to be able to handle things wisely. What you know is what you can do.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    verdict was given as the first case, they told Plessy he could file to have his case presented in the…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Managers are most likely to step across ethical and legal boundaries when the pressure to perform is great. Pressure can be healthy but companies that set high-performance targets and grant large rewards for achieving these must have strong control systems to ensure that people are not tempted to cross boundaries. What are the four important control systems? Please identify each control by name.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Evaluate Jefferies pricing considerations for the upgrade. Are there other pricing factors that Jefferies might consider?…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    landmark case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the year of 1991 a murder had taken place that brought upon suspicion and several conflicts amongst officials. The murder was of a man by the name of Frank Boyle and one of the suspects for the crime was Michael Feeney, the police had been informed that he was seen near the victim’s truck earlier that day. During the investigation of the murder, the police went to Feeney’s residence and waited for him to come out. When there was no answer, the police had to barge in and they searched the premises without permission. The house was an equipment trailer and the police found Feeney in his bed, they told him to get up and they saw blood stains on Feeney’s shirt. After noticing blood on his shirt the police immediately arrested him and briefly advised him of the right to a council. The accused was asked several questions and his shirt was later seized. He had been questioned for eight hours straight and he still wasn’t able to contact his lawyer, during the questioning Feeney admitted to stealing the victim’s cigarettes, beer and also some cash.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reeva Steenkamp was a beautiful twenty-nine year-old model and reality-TV star. She and Pistorius had only been dating for four short months. During Pistorius statement to the court, he explained that he yelled at the person in the bathroom, and then yelled for Reeva to call the police. Reeva never answered him. Investigators also wanted to know where Pistorius was standing when he fired the gun. He said he did not have his legs attached but used his stumps. “Why would a burglar lock himself in a bathroom cubicle? Why would the victim be shot through her shorts if she was using the toilet in the middle of the night? And why would she have taken her cell phone into the bathroom at three A.M.?”(Seal). These are all questions that Pistorius could not answer. Using this evidence in the murder case Seal feels like he has supported his…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assignment: Your team’s task is to recommend to the Board of Blaine Kitchenware (BKI) whether the firm should undertake the leveraged recap. In doing so, please address the four questions below.  Teams 1-6: your task is to recommend for a leveraged recap with quantitative and qualitative support  Teams 7-13: your task is to recommend against a leveraged recap with quantitative and qualitative support Along with a signed copy of the Marshall Honor Code, submit a hard copy case report of one-page, single-spaced executive summary, summarizing your analysis and recommendation(s), followed by up to five-page legible appendices of supporting calculations, analyses and reference. Note: An excel file with case exhibits 1-4 has been posted on Blackboard. You can only use this file (which contains copyrighted materials) for our class purposes and you may not copy or post the file on any other medium. Objective: This case is designed to provide you with the opportunity to apply financial analysis to critical financial decisions. We will apply various capital structure and payout theories to a leveraged recap decision by 1) examining issues involved in determining the appropriate capital structure, especially as it applies to enterprise and equity valuation; 2) analyzing the impact of the leverage on the weighted average cost of capital of the firm. You might find Chapters 3, 4, 7, 12 and 14-16 of our text useful. Possible concepts used: EFN, growth rates, financial ratios, financial leverage, MM propositions and tradeoff theory, pecking order theory, agency cost theory, share repurchase, special cash dividends, enterprise value, debt and equity value, WACC, cost of debt, cost of equity as well as the CAPM. Questions: 1. Is Blaine Kitchenware, Inc. financially sound? In particular, is the firm profitable? What is the firm’s sustainable growth rate? How is the company currently…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. *Define the term “premeditated murder” and discuss why Pistorius’ lawyer will challenge the prosecution’s charges of “premeditate murder”. (100-120 words) (6 marks)…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -A person saw through the window when the criminal buried the body in the backyard…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The aim of this case is to present a contemporary criminal case. The case must have occurred in the last ten years. It must be an indictable offence, a more serious criminal charge where the defendant has the right to trial by jury and has been found guilty. The analysis of the case will be carried out through the extent which the law balances the rights of victims and offenders.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The procedural history of the case: the Supreme Court of South Australia, the High Court of Australia.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sara Lee Corporation uses primarily a related diversification strategy. Note that questions 5 and 6 will be discussion only; no written answers required.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Worrall, J. L. (2010). Criminal procedure: from first contact to appeal. (3rd ed.) Upper Saddle…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays