Case Analysis: The Tennessee Vs. Lane Case

Tennessee V. Lane Case Before 2004, courthouses and other public buildings differed from how they are today. There was one thing that these buildings did not have, a handicapped entrance. At this time, it could be very embarrassing to be handicapped because you could do nothing for yourself. If you wanted to enter a public building, you had to ask someone to carry you in, or even worse, you might have to crawl up stairs to enter! This was a definite problem that had been around for years, however, no one addressed it.

This all changed after the Tennessee v. Lane case. This case forced public buildings to install handicapped entrances, making life easier for anyone handicapped. This case was a real eye-opener to the struggle of being handicapped and it
Project displays content and details that are truly relevant, interesting, meaningful, engaging, and specific. This student thoughtfully engaged with the details of his or her content. 2. Project displays content and details that are mostly relevant, interesting, meaningful, engaging, and specific. This student engaged with the details of his or her content. 3. Project displays content and details that are somewhat relevant, interesting, meaningful, engaging and specific. This student should have more thoughtfully engaged with the details of his or her content. 4. Project displays content and details that are limited and not very relevant, interesting, meaningful, engaging, and specific. This student did not thoughtfully engage with the details of his or her content.

Organization: 1. This project is well organized from beginning to end. Student met all required deadlines. 2. This project is generally well organized. Met all deadlines. 3. This project has a few errors in organizational format that become distracting to the reader. Student missed one of the required deadlines or turned in one of the aspects