Preview

Case Law Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
270 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Law Study
Dawn Montgomery
BUSI Law 2301 NT
February 15, 2013

Case Study #1

I. FACTS: Helen, age 17, falsely presented an identification card showing her age as 22 to a motorcycle dealer. She persuaded him to sell her a motorcycle on credit because she did not have the money to pay cash. Helen drove the motorcycle away and a few days later, returned it to the dealer stating that she voided the contract. The dealer states that she cannot void the contract because (a) she had misrepresented her age and (b) the motorcycle was damaged.

II. ISSUE: Can she legally void the contract?

III. HOLDING: Yes, the minor may void the contract but, depending on the state, may be held responsible for damage, ordinary wear and tear, and depreciation of the goods prior to disaffirmance.

IV. REASONING: The legal avoidance, or setting aside, of a contractual obligation is referred to as disaffirmance. To disaffirm, a minor must express through words or conduct, his or her intent not to be bound to the contract. They must disaffirm the entire contract, not just a portion of it. Courts in most states hold that the minor need only return the goods subject to the contract. Even if the minor returns damaged goods, the minor is often entitled to disaffirm the contract and obtain a refund of the purchase price. However, a growing number of states are beginning to put an additional duty on the minor to restore the adult party to the position she or he held before the contract was made. These courts may also hold a minor responsible for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A minor named Alice entered into a contract with Silver Flatware Ltd. for purchasing silverware on a long-term credit contract. The goods was delivered but the payment was not yet been fully made by Alice. Before she attain the age of majority, Alice repudiated the contract and refused to return the silverware. The company demanded a return of the silverware and refused to refund. The company sued Alice for the balance of purchase price.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A dealer sold a new car to Raymond Smith. The sales contract contained language expressly disclaiming liability for personal injuries caused as a result of defects in the car and limiting the remedy for breach of warranty to repair or replacement of the defective part. One month after purchasing the auto, Smith was seriously injured when the car veered off the road and into a ditch as a result of a defect in the steering mechanism of the car.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The issue is whether Jane can disaffirm the contract and demand that Midtown Toyota return her $3,500. The specific issue is whether Jane made a false and fraudulent misrepresentation of her age when she entered into the contract with Midtown Toyota to purchase the vehicle. The court would likely find that Jane did not fraudulently misrepresent her age. Additionally, as a minor, Jane had no duty to read the contract she entered into with Midtown Toyota. The court would likely find that Jane did not fraudulently misrepresent her age because of the circumstances surrounding the execution of the contract and the fact that the law imposes no duty on minors to read contracts.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the time of the sale maybe Jeff thought 17 was old enough to purchase a car. Between Jeff and Steve they accepted the down payment of $200 a month and Jeff was able to take the car. Six months down the road Jeff loses his job and takes the car back to Steve because he cannot afford the payments and wants his money back. This contract is void because Jeff is underage.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Mary damages a client’s hair she would be held liable. According to our textbook, Mary would cause injury to the plaintiff. Mary was to provide a duty of care to the customer. She breached this duty of care “failure to exercise care or to act as reasonable person would act (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 81).” The reason I state, that is because the customer trusted Mary with their hair and she damaged the client’s hair. As long as Celia and Mary register their boutique name with the United States PTO in Washington, DC, and the PTO approved it, there should not be any legal problems. If Celia and Mary decide to offer…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PRETEST 2

    • 702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the absence of a contact complete with offer, acceptance, and consideration, a court may enforce a promise under the principle of promissory estoppel where…

    • 702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Decision: Desmond Campbell, you are convicted of the murder of Janet Campbell. I sentence you to a non parole period of…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law and Car Company

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Disaffirming a contract is "When the minor decides not to perform the legal obligations contemplated in the agreement and thus disaffirms the contract, this action results in a voidable contract. The minor has the option to either performing the contract or avoiding it." (Davidson 276).…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: The evening of May 4, 1982, Charma and Hugh Riddle were in their living room watching television. Mrs. Riddle proceeded to leave the room to go to the bathroom, but was surprised to find “respondent Cartwright” in the hallway with a shotgun in his hands (1). Charma Riddle fought with Cartwright for the gun, but Cartwright was able to shoot Mrs. Riddle twice in the legs. Apparently Mrs. Riddle was familiar with Cartwright as he was a “disgruntled ex-employee” of the couple (1). Cartwright then went on to the living room where Hugh Riddle was and shot and killed him. While Cartwright was tending to Mr. Riddle, Mrs.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. What effect did the United States Supreme Court’s decision have on the Texas statute?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Connie Spears, whom had with a history of blood clots, arrived at Christus Santa Rosa Hospital’s emergency room of Texas in 2010 with unbearable leg discomfort. She was diagnosed with something minor and went home only to find herself in agonizing pain few days later. Emergency personnel escorted her to another hospital and found a massive blood clot and tissue damage. The doctors surgically removed both legs in order to save her life.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Study Plan

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Strict: requires one party to perform its duties perfectly. Substantial: generally sufficient to entitle the promisor the contract price, minus the cost of defects in the work.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case

    • 6864 Words
    • 28 Pages

    | |74 S. Ct. 686; 98 L. Ed. 873; 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2094; 53 |…

    • 6864 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cases and Laws

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the earlier days women and African Americans had no rights to school, work or any other type of socialization. They were brought into slavery, housewives and had no rights as an individual. This included people with disabilities (even those with MMR classification) because they were, “viewed as nonproductive and expandable.” (Gollnick & Chinn, pg. 181, 2013) The rights we have today as women, African Americans, and those disabled are because of results that came about from case laws.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In effect of section 10 and 11 of contract Act 1950, the courts held in the cases of Mohori Bibee V Dharmodas Ghose (1903), Tan Hee Juan V Teh Boon Kiat (1934) and Government of Malaysia V Gurcharan Singh (1971) that all such agreements are void. Therefore, all contracts entered by a minor is generally void and a minor cannot sue or be sued on such void…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics