Preview

Case Observation: White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Observation: White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern
Case Observation
White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern

In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.
Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern claim they were not actually knowledgeable that Mr. Daniels, the bartender, knew that Mr. Hard was intoxicated before severing him his last drink and leaving the establishment. Without actual knowledge, Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern would not be subject to any wrongdoing. Working in a restaurant that has severed alcohol, I have seen patrons that were unable to leave under their own power. I don’t understand how someone, unless they were new to bartending

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    9. On the occasion in question, Defendant was traveling behind Plaintiff in the left hand lane of Interstate 57 when Plaintiff noticed Defendant’s lights flashing. Plaintiff moved over to the right hand lane to allow Defendant to pass, at which time he saw beer cases falling from Defendant’s truck towards him. Plaintiff swerved left in an attempt to avoid the beer cases when the accident occurred.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dethorne Graham, who is a diabetic, asked a friend, William Berry, to drive him to a store to purchase some juice to neutralize the start of an insulin reaction. When Dethorne Graham entered the store, he saw the number of people that would be ahead of him, Dethorne Graham hurried out and asked William Berry to drive him to a friend's house instead. Connor, a Charlotte, North Carolina police officer, became wary after seeing Dethorne Graham quickly enter and leave the store. Officer Connor followed William Berry's car, about half a mile from the store, he made an investigative stop and ordered Dethorne Graham And William Berry to wait while he found out what had happened in the store.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedural History: Lower court entered a directed verdict for Dr. Turk b/c there was an absence of evidence that he intended to inflict personal injury…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Leighe Case Study

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mr. Leighe is charged with a hit and run, that caused a pedestrian to lose his life. Mr. Hall was riding his bike down the road, in front of Leighe, with his front and rear lights working properly, following all the rules. Leighe hit him with the front of his car, then drove away from the accident scene immediately. He had not only been drinking wine that evening, but also drove home, and hid his car at the back of his property. Leighe fled from the crime scene, had alcohol in his system, and hid the evidence. However, his driving record only consisted of two speeding tickets made more than 10 years ago. Leighe claims his car was frosted over making it visibly difficult to see and therefore had no intention of harming Mr. Hall. He also pleaded…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The background of this lawsuit is based on Debbie White suing Patrick Gibbs and his Tavern for the death of her husband . The reason why Debbie wants the bar to be held responsible is due to the fact that Mr. Edward Hard left intoxicated and crashed into Mrs. White 's car and killed her husband . The Gibbs feel his bar shouldn’t be held responsible due to the fact that the bartender didn’t see Mr. Hard intoxicated. Mr. Hard was also an ex-boyfriend of Debbie 's and the bar feels that the accident was intentional. Mr. Gibbs wants the court to dismiss the case based on summary judgment which is “a judgment requested by any party to a civil action to end the action when it is believed that there is no genuine issue or material fact in dispute” (Mosby’s Dictionary).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: In October of 1970, the defendant, her boyfriend, and two other people drove near the area of St. Ignatius Retreat Home. The defendant was a passenger and to her understanding, they were headed for Christopher Morely…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ultimately, the court did not see it Mrs. McCarty’s way. McCarty argued the judge should have granted her motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the defendant. McCarty did not request the directed verdict on the issue of Pheasant Runs negligence which is a prerequisite to judgment n.o.v. Many accidents are neither the injurer nor the victims fault and therefore there is no liability. The judge advised Mrs. McCarty that the case was not as one sided as she believed it to be. Additionally, following a jury’s verdict, a judge cannot substitute its judgment when the judgment was reasonable (2). Mrs. McCarty did a poor job in proving that Pheasant Run could have prevented her attack with her advised precautions. Mrs. McCarty did not provide information of what it would cost Pheasant Run to equip the hotel rooms with improved locking systems…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. A business fails to meet the criteria if its practices are not equal and if has procedures unrelated to necessary job functions in the organization. In the case of McDonnell Douglas vs Green the Supreme Court holds that a charging party can prove unlawful discrimination indirectly by showing a failure in the organizational business process. In this case the hiring and firing of an employee, McDonnell Douglas was taken to court over their unethical tactics. The charging party has to only prove four things: they are a minority (protected group), they applied and were qualified for the position, the job was not offered to them, and the employer continued to seek applicants with similar qualifications. If the plaintiff can prove these four elements, the employer must show a legitimate lawful reason why the person was not hired.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism in McDonald v. City of Chicago Judicial Restraint is when the Supreme Court restricts their powers to avoid making any changes to public policy, unless that policy is unconstitutional. When applying judicial restraint to cases, the courts stand by stare decisis (previous decisions of the court), uphold current law, and hold strictly to the text of the Constitution. They think that by only interpreting the constitution and not creating new laws, that they are preserving the laws that this country was founded on. Judicial activism is the opposite.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Various states have their own court hierarchies. Washington D.C. is not a state, but nonetheless has its own court hierarchy. Initial criminal and civil complaints are filed at D.C. Superior Court. Unlike other states, Washington, D.C. has a smaller jurisdiction, and if a case is appealed it is brought to the D.C. Court of Appeals. Other jurisdictions usually have two levels of appellate courts.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It starts off with Tanner writing a letter to Jim explaining a small part of his background and his story about his experience with the law enforcement. As he was in jail he would write about what happened during the day. Most of the time he would talk about what he saw and heard in his cell, or when he goes to the Alcoholism Treatment Center. After he was released from the treatment center, he had to attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings every night. He couldn’t handle it so he had beer in the restroom and got drunk. Later, he realized that he should approach and find out what is lacking, what the person needs to help fill his needs. He believes that people can drink just to feel happy. So then Tanner wrote a Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Judge so he could explain the reason why people should not be arrest for being drunk under some circumstances. He feels that his rights may have been/are being abridged, infringed, or violated in the following instances, occasions, and particulars. The judge denied his writ and set his trial in Municipal Court. The judge said that his writ was premature and could only be submitted after I had been tried and found guilty.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Ross vs Davis, I would certainly rule in favor of Davis. Davis decided to leave her career by choice a full year prior to Ross’s disclaimer. When person leaves a job or career, a written notice is usually given to the employer. It appears in this case, someone in the Human Resource Department, or another unknown source had left out some of the information that should have been directed to Diana Ross about Gail Davis decision to resign from the job. Being in the profession that Diana Ross was in, it is very hard to keep up with some companies call the small things.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Loeffler, R. L., & Lawson, T. J. (2002). Age and occupational status of defendant in relation…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Procedure: The jury first found for Mr. Faverty. Then Faverty filed suit against McDonald’s, and McDonald’s appealed.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays