Preview

Case Of C. V. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. 523 US

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
551 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Of C. V. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. 523 US
Regarding the case of C. Elvin Feltner, Jr. v Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., Columbia Pictures accused Feltner of owing royalty payments for showing programs after the license to do so was revoked ("Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. 523 U.S. 340 (1998)", 1998). Columbia Pictures tried to resolve the debt owed by Feltner, owner of Krypton International Corporation, outside of court but negotiations failed and Columbia Pictures terminated their license agreement. Feltner’s television stations continued to broadcast Columbia Pictures’ programs. Columbia Pictures then sued for copyright infringement. Columbia Pictures decided to pursue statutory damages in lieu of actual damages ("Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. 523 U.S. 340", 1998).
Feltner sought a jury trial but was denied by the Federal District Court that stated that there is no statutory right to a jury trial in copyright infringement cases and awarded Columbia pictures damages of $20,000 per act of infringement equaling a total of $8,800,000 ("Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc. 523 U.S.
…show more content…
The lower courts were holding the Copyright Act while the Supreme Court upheld the constitution because historical cases considered a jury as part of the court.
It is my opinion that Columbia Pictures deserved to win statutory damages for copyright infringement because Feltner willfully continued to broadcast the content without a license. I also agree with the decision of the Supreme Court to uphold the right to a jury trial. As for the ruling of the jury trial which ruled that Columbia Pictures trial to significantly more money I believe that was a fair trial considering that Feltner is the one that pushed for a jury throughout the entire

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Procedure: Plaintiff Katko filed suit against Briney in Mahaska District Court seeking damages for injury suffered by defendant. After trial by jury and in accordance with jury verdict, Court awarded plaintiff actual and punitive damages. Court denied defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial. Defendant appealed.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    S. Co. Inc. V.

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page

    The court affirmed. Business income generated by S corporations flowed directly to appellants for taxation purposes and retained status as it passed to appellants. Appellants availed themselves of Ohio's benefits and opportunities by earning income through Subchapter S corporations. The S corporations' business activity removed appellants from immunity ((LINCCWeb Catalog Search, n.d.).…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it constitutional to take away money from a person although it was gained for an interview with a publisher about one’s past crimes? Is it constitutional to take the money and give it to the victim of these past crimes? Does this or does not contradict the First Amendment which allows to express one’s mind freely with no discrimination concerning the context? The dispute over the Son of Sam law can be lead down to one question: whether speaking about crime is also a crime. Obviously, there could be two answers, one negative, and another one positive. According to the Son of Sam law, there is only one interpretation: if a…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killer Joe Summary

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reston Eilers was sent several copyright letters by Killer Joe Nevada LLC, the copyright owner of the movie “Killer Joe”. The alleged infringer was identified as Doe-76.115.252.140 after a subpoena was sent to the ISP where Mr. Eilers was subscribed with.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kuehn v. Pub Zone

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The appellate court reversed the trail court and reinstated the jury’s verdict. Mr. Kuehn was awarded $300,000 in damages.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Lawsuit: S. Victor Whitmill vs. Warner Bros. In April 2011, Warner Bros was sued by the tattoo artist Victor Whitmill for a copyright infringement in the film ‘The Hangover Part 2’. In the movie, Stu (Ed Helms) wakes up after a night of debauchery in a Bangkok hotel with a duplicate of Mike Tyson’s tribal face tattoo. The plaintiff designed the tattoo specially for Mike Tyson and therefore claimed it was a copyrighted work. Whitmill claimed that Warner Bros had no right to put his work in the film or in any promotional materials attached to The Hangover Part II.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dominick10 Tb Ch09

    • 953 Words
    • 8 Pages

    6. In the late 1940s, the courts upheld studios ' rights to control production, distribution,…

    • 953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second, the right to a jury of their peers. The Supreme Court has used Selective Incorporation to give the rights to the states to setup their jury system and that differs from the Federal…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those who are familiar with Trans World Airlines know that the name Howard Hughes is synonymous with TWA. Some might even go as far as to call the defunct company “Howard Hughes” airline. Hughes, a man who at one time owned 78% of TWA’s stock is said to not only own TWA, but love the company more than any of his other possessions. This brings one to wonder how a man who was so obsessed by this particular company end up going to court against that company. This paper will inform you of the background of the infamous Howard Hughes, his involvement in Trans World Airlines, and the court case of Hughes vs. TWA.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the act itself had noble intentions of preserving the right of copyright holders the terminology used to describe and detail it led to fears of infringement of the first amendment, the right of free speech. The american public out-lashed at the potential loss of their first amendment rights, and so the bill was not passed. Still, the government’s intention was to preserve the safety of individual’s intellectual property, their means simply managed to go farther than the public was willing. Thus we can see a delicate and hard to maintain stability between protecting people’s rights, and ensuring their…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kodak Company in 1888 was created by George Eastman who founded new concepts for photography. This company brought an enlighten way of how people use new technology of photographing to the mainstream. Once the company success begun, Kodak developed a solid control over the photography market making it a monopoly in the picture making business. According Antitrust Laws “a monopoly occurs when one company has solid control over the market with a particular product or service. The Sherman Antitrust Law was enacted in 1890 to prevent corporate monopolies or attempts at monopolization. This includes contracts to restrain free trade and protects consumers from unfair business practices. This act was made into law, Congressional support for it was so strong that there was only one vote against it” (2013). Therefore, 1921 and 1954 Kodak was faced by the US Government officials with an agreement that the company violated federal law of Sherman Act. The company reconciled the ruling of 1921 and concurred with the government to be protected by limitation. Under the agreement Kodak was eliminated from allowing products created by its competitors to be sold freely. Kodak endure another problem in 1954 ruling which deemed the company from selling a package which contained color film and photofinishing, that was considered restricted. The plan for the package of items was for them to sell an item on the purpose that a consumer buys a different item, or consider they will not purchase that item from another company. In addition, Kodak plan was to have consumers buy or sell an item on the assumption that the buyer must purchase additional items that were included in the item price. Both rulings showed proof that the company was guilty of the price power.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sony Corp Case Summary

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The District Court regarded the copying as fair use since there is no accompanying reduction in the market for the original work. This was a very contentious case since the District Court denied Sony’s relief they sought and entered judgment for petitioners. 480 F. Supp. 429 (1979). The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the District Court 's judgment on the copyright claim, holding Sony liable for contributory infringement and ordering the District Court to fashion appropriate relief. 659 F.2d 963 (1981). The US Supreme Court certiorari, 457 U.S. 1116 (1982); with 463 U.S. 1226 (1983) reversing the Appeals…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UNITED STATES V Bass

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court overturned a Sixth Circuit opinion continuing a decision of the federal court to grant John Bass's discovery motion in reference to the selective prosecution. Bass the defendant suspected that the government wanted a death penalty against him based on race thus a motion granted on the discovery concerning the capital charging practices of the government. The District Court settled the discovery motion and then dismissed the notice after the government stated that it would not comply with the discovery order.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court and the one that decides and interprets whether laws or acts are constitutional. Simply put, they interpret whether a law is constitutional or not based on what they think the constitution means. Because the constitution doesn’t explicitly or definitively state anything, this interpretation can lead to many differing point of view. Some supreme court members opt for a strict approach to this document, whereby the words of the founders are meant to be taken literally and at face value, and anything that isn’t explicitly expressed in the constitution is not something that can be derived as such. Others argue that the founders couldn’t possibly have put every specific rule or…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In MGM v. Grokster the Supreme Court said that some of the main reasons for finding the peer-to-peer site Grokster liable were that it did not sufficiently police infringement when they were responsible for doing so, and the owners of the site continued to receive a financial benefit from the infringing material in the form of ad revenue. YouTube does remove copyrighted materials from its website as an act to avoid being the target of a copyright infringement lawsuit. In a more recent lawsuit, Viacom claimed that YouTube was knowingly using its copyrighted materials to earn revenue from advertising and from driving customers to its site (Mackrell, 2010). The judge found in YouTube’s favor, and noted that their current system for removing media that infringed on…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays