Preview

Case Project 5-3 & 5-5

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
865 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Project 5-3 & 5-5
Case Projects 5-3 and 5-5

Tanya Boone
Unit 2 Project
CJ 317-01

Case Project 5-3 Under the silver platter doctrine, evidence obtained by state agents in an unreasonable search and seizure was admissible in a federal criminal trial, where no federal agent participated in a search and seizure and the state officers did not act solely on behalf of the United States (Hills, 1999). Simply put, federal officers cannot allow state police to do the dirty work, and then claim that they did not violate search and seizure rights. By analogy, no government agent can stand by, allow a private citizen to violate search and seizure strictures on the government 's behalf, and then claim innocence as to the violation (Hills, 1999). If a civilian gives evidence to an officer, the civilian could then begin working for the officer and be considered an agent of law enforcement. But the civilian can not violate the Fourth Amendment search and seizure rights. Since Gary found the evidence and turned it over to an officer, the officer can accept it and then start an investigation if necessary. The officer can not ask Gary to go back and look for more evidence, because then Gary would be considered an agent of law enforcement and therefore bound to follow the law. This means that probable cause would be needed and a warrant would need to be issued before anyone could legally go back and look inside the computer for additional evidence. If the officer wants to get a warrant based off of the evidence that Gary has given to him, that would be fine and then the officer or Gary could go and look for more evidence. This is all based on whether Gary chooses to work for the officer or not. Either way, proper chain of custody must be followed and the correct reports and documents must be filed.
Case Project 5-5 After you have gathered as much information as possible about the incident or crime scene, you can start listing what you need at the scene. Being over-prepared is better than



References: Hills, D. (1999). From the Incident Through the System Legally:Knowledge Base of Legal Concepts. Retrieved from http://www.csudh.edu/dearhabermas/silvplat.htm Nelson, B., Phillips, A., & Steuart, C. (2010). Guide to Computer Forensics and Investigations (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Minnesota vs. Timothy Dickerson, two police officers parked in an unmarked car, outside of an apartment building known for trafficking contraband substances, did willfully and knowingly stop and frisk respondent due to suspicious and evasive behavior, exiting the twelve-unit apartment building. The officers felt that upon his exit and approach towards patrol car, and eye contact with one of the officers, he turned and proceeded into a side alley. Officers then pursued respondent feeling his suspicious and evasive behavior was probable of being criminal in nature. They pulled their car into the alley and immediately stopped and searched the defendants outer clothing finding no weapons. During the cursory search one officer testified that he had felt a cellophane bag containing crack cocaine later when weighed a total of 1/5th of a gram was found. The officers claimed it within their scope to search and seize what the officer suspected to be drugs inside the defendants clothing.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2002, Lemon Montrea Johnson was the passenger in the backseat of a car stopped for a traffic violation. Johnson was charged with; inter alia, possession of drugs and possession of a weapon by a felon. These items were discovered during a protective pat-down search of Johnson. Johnson was convicted by the trial court. Johnson argued that his conviction should be overturned because the trial court was in error by denying his motion to suppress the evidence. He argued that he had been unlawfully “seized” because being a passenger in a vehicle does not automatically constitute “seizure.” He furthered argued that even if he had been “seized,” that by the time Officer Trevizo searched him he was no longer “seized” as their conversation had become consensual. Furthermore, the evidence should not be considered because the search violated his Fourth Amendment rights and because the…

    • 4995 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue brought into question in the Terry vs. Ohio case in 1968 involved a police officer, McFadden, who was patrolling the area in normal clothes. He came across two men pacing the area suspiciously and glancing into a store. He the watched them meet at a street corner frequently where they were joined by another man. After watching them do this approximately twenty-four times he approached the group and asked them their names. He patted down the overcoat that the man was wearing and felt a revolver, which he then removed. The defense argued the issue to be admissibility of evidence uncovered by an improper search and seizure. They argued that the Fourth Amendment protects the people despite where they are; at home or on the streets. It…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Mapp v Ohio (1961), the Court stated that any evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment could not be admitted into any court, state or federal. The Exclusionary Rule  Determining What is Inadmissible – Illegally Seized Evidence • • • • Contraband Fruits of the crime Instruments of the crime…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defense chooses to cite Riley v. California, but the application of this case case to State v. Rounds is incorrect. The claim that the gift cards obtained by Officer Towns somehow equates to the cellphone seized by Riley’s arresting officer is illogical. Riley v. California classifies phones as mini-computers, having access to a cloud of information, gift cards on the other hand, are much simpler with far fewer functions. Access to these functions only reveals evidence of the specific crime Officer Towns suspected. Officer Towns suspected the cards had been stolen, a very pointed crime, one which has very direct and specific with the procedure for affirming or dismissing those suspicions. Established by both City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000) and Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), as long as in the balancing test between intrusion to the motorist and the interest of government, the intrusion is minimal and closely correlated with the crime, the search is permissible. In the case of State v. Rounds the scan of the cards was protected and necessary, it was a minimal intrusion. Riley v. California held that while the officers did not have the right to search the phone without a warrant, it could have been disconnected from the network and placed in a “Faraday Bag” to protect the information on it. This cannot be applicable to gift cards. An officer on the scene cannot easily disconnect…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dustin Soldano v. Howard O’Daniels case models the common dispute between negligence and a party’s responsibility in an event. Likewise, chapter 1 of the Legal Environment textbook features Kuehn v. Pub Zone, a case that demonstrates a different scenario but the same battle of negligence and liability. The commonalities between the two cases support one another in the demonstration of the judges’ decisions as well as contribute to later common law.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Horton v California

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue being brought up is if the evidence recovered was able to be used against Horton during the case. Justice Stevens discusses to the court and explains “Whether the warrantless seizure of evidence of crime in plain view is prohibited by the Fourth Amendment if the discovery of the evidence was not inadvertent.” The main issue in this case and other similar cases is the “plain-view” aspect of them. If the warrant does not describe or authorize you to recover weapons or other evidence are you allowed to recover them if you come upon them? Then if recovered is it allowed to be used in court as evidence against the…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dlk Case Analysis

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Document A provides an overview of a precedent case, Carroll v. United States, where it was decided that in the situation that evidence could be destroyed or hidden, it is constitutional to conduct a search without a warrant. The overview described the case saying “federal agents believed Carroll was selling liquor...they saw him driving...and pulled him over…they searched his car finding liquor and arrested him.” Although this case is in fact different from DLK v. United States, it mirrors one idea, law enforcement took action without a warrant. In DLK v. United States, the federal agents suspected DLK was growing marijuana in his home. However, because there was not sufficient evidence to obtain a warrant “the imager [was a reasonable way] for law enforcement to gather information without … a search warrant” (Document E). Using thermal imaging in this case was a permitted means of collecting information and is summarized well with Justice John Paul Stevens’s statement in Document F, “[t]he officers’ conduct did not amount to a search and was perfectly…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1914, Weeks v. United States was decided by the Supreme Court. In Weeks, the Court made a landmark decision relating to illegal search and seizure by law enforcement called the Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule provided that evidence “illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of a suspect’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures cannot be used against the suspect in a criminal prosecution.” (Exclusionary Rule, 2010, p. 287). However, it was not until the 1961 case of Mapp v. Ohio that the Court made the Exclusionary Rule binding on the states…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I learned this semester the exclusionary rule is that the exclusionary rule is evidence that is declared in an illegal search could not be used in a federal court for the reason of a violation of citizens' rights, the fourth amendment. Although the exclusionary rule has its pros and cons, it protects innocent people from having charges brought on them. Nevertheless, I do agree with what Edwin Meese has to say around the exclusionary rule. Any officer who does not seize evidence properly can absolutely let criminals walk freely. It allows guilty people free and it also allows further crimes to be committed before being brought to jail.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police searches are governed by the fourth amendment that provides protection against illegal search and seizure and requires that the issuing of warrants is based on probable cause. Gould and Mastrofski focus on warrant less searches. A legal search must be based on the concept of probable cause. As cited in our text book, The Police, probable cause is information that is "sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed" (as cited, Brinegar v United States, 1949). A police officer must make a determination about probable cause based on the totality of the circumstances, in each and every situation. Without the existence of probable cause prior to a search, that search would be held unconstitutional and any evidence gained will usually be omitted from trial, with few exceptions.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bonsigmore, J. (2006). Before the Law; An Introduction to the Legal Process. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.</p>…

    • 1489 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Navigating the Fourth Amendment and the law of warrantless searches and seizures largely involves case law rather than statutes, and today’s principles are the results of more than 200 years of judicial evolution. The constitution has been the back bone of the United States legal system since it was first written and signed by our founding fathers. This document has been the topic of many debates and has gone through many changes and clarifications throughout the years. The Fourth Amendment of the constitution is one of the most debated amendments.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law and Environment

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The judge has made a judicial error by allowing the Plaintiff's counsel to comment on the case about Minichiello's boss being a German with an "attitude of hatred" and made forced analogies to Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. The judge also allowed irrelevant testimony, which asserted that the Club discriminated against Latinos, Jews, and African-Americans, to the issue of discrimination based on sexual orientation. I agree that awarding $20,000,000 was grossly excessive and has no rational basis, and was an error by the judge as well.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays