Preview

Case study FIAT

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1678 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case study FIAT
Case study: FIAT GROUP’S FIRST-TIME ADOPTION OF IFRS

Question 1: What is Fiat’s key accounting policies? Which of Fiat’s key accounting policies are affected by the adoption of IFRS?

a. Fiat’s key accounting policies:

The Fiat Group has a tendency of engaging in financing accountings mechanism, selling a significant part of its finance, trade and tax receivables through either securitization programs or factoring transactions

b. Fiat’s key accounting policies are affected by the adoption of IFRS:

Three accounting changes by adoption of IFRS are related to Fiat’s critical accounting policies:

- The change to capitalization of development expenditures

- The change in the recognition of margins on sales with buy-back commitments.

- The change in (de)recognition of “sold” receivables.

The impact on its 2004 profit/loss will be profit-decreasing. Refer to Appendix A for the detailed impact figures.

In 2005, assuming that there is no R&D expenditure, the impact on the company’s 2005 profit will be from that of the amortized amount of the R&D expenditure from 2004. Hence, the expenses in 2005 will increase. However, if there is R&D expenditure in 2005, the effect on the profit/loss is minimal from the changes in accounting policy as the capitalization of development expenditures reduces the expenses in the profit and loss statement as the amount is amortized over the years and not recognized one-off in 2005.

The IFRS profit was a better reflection of the Fiat Group’s performance in 2004. IFRS better reflects the recognition of sales with buy-back commitment and allows for better matching as deferred costs are now expensed when incurred. It also better reflects the costs of employees as stock option compensation is now expensed.

Question 2: Summarize the differences between Fiat’s key accounting methods under Italian GAAP and those under IFRS. What characterizes the differences between two sets of methods? From the perspective of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    References: Ankarath, N., Ghosh, T.P., Alkafaji, Y. A., & Mehta, K. J. (2010). Understanding IFRS Fundamentals: International Financial Reporting Standards.…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper seeks to analyze the GAAP and the IFRS, their mandate and functions. Further, it shall compare the differences and similarities of the two standards which have such great implications to the functions of accountants, attorneys, corporate directors and financial officers.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are several differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The IFRS is considered more of a "principles based" accounting standard in contrast to U.S. GAAP which is considered more "rules based." By being more "principles based", IFRS, arguably, represents and captures the economics of a transaction better than U.S. GAAP. As a team me collaborated to answer the following seven questions.…

    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harnischfeger Case

    • 1476 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Assuming that a straight-line method will be used, depreciation expenses will be more realistic. The change will increase profits by $3.2 million or $.27 per share, but reduces them in future profits to…

    • 1476 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    ACC 541 Week 1

    • 1251 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The FASB intends to analyze each of the differences within the scope and either (1) amend applicable U.S. GAAP literature to reduce or eliminate the difference or (2) communicate to the IASB the Board’s rationale for electing not to change U.S. GAAP. Concurrently, the IASB will review IFRS and make similar determinations of whether to amend applicable IFRS or communicate its rationale to the FASB for electing not to change the IASB’s GAAP (Schroeder, Clark, & Cathey, 2011). A couple of the issues the FASB and IFRS are currently working on include…

    • 1251 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Limited early adoption of IFRS in an effort to enhance comparability for US investors c.…

    • 4280 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Companies have always faced issues of how to reflect changes in accounting methods and error corrections in financial statements. A change in accounting principle results when an entity adopts a generally accepted accounting principle different from the one it used previously (Hall 2007). A presumption exists that an accounting principle once adopted shall not be changed in accounting for events and transactions of a similar type (Financial Accounting Standards Board). It is preferred that consistent use of the same accounting principle from one accounting period to another is used because it enhances the utility of financial statements for users by facilitating analysis and understanding of comparative accounting data. Consistent use provides a dimension of high-value financial statements that assist in analysis and enhance comparability (Bloom and Fuglister 2006). However, there are times when changes are needed. A change in accounting principle is not considered at the initial adoption of the principle or modification of an accounting principle necessitated by transactions (Financial Accounting Standards Board). A company is only allowed to change an accounting principle if the change is required a newly issued codification update or the entity can justify the use of an allowable alternative accounting principle on the basis that it is preferable (Financial Accounting Standards Board). Any of these may require an entity to change an accounting principle. Such a requirement is sufficient justification for making a change in accounting principle. The burden of justifying other changes in accounting principle rests with the reporting entity making the change (Williams and Carcello, FASB Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Correction. 2005).…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus 700 Final Exam

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The answers to all questions should be in your own English words. However, I expect you to refer to authoritative accounting and financial reporting literature (FASB - Accounting Standards Codification and IASB - Unaccompanied IFRS. For IASB pronouncements you may need to go to Murphy Library or other sources to read the accompaniments to IFRS. There are 3 copies of IFRS 2009 in on reserve at Murphy. Most of the information in this edition is still valid. When you refer to authoritative accounting and reporting literature, you must cite your references within your answers.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ifrs vs Gaap

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    be made. Many aspects of the GAAP and IFRS are very different. It is the intent of this paper to analyze differences between the two methods in revenue recognition, earnings per share, inventory, and intangible assets.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. What is the effect of the depreciation lives change? How will this change affect future reported profits?…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harnischfeger Corp

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is the effect of the depreciation accounting method change on the reported income in 1984? How will this change affect profits in future years?…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ACG 6257 Research Paper

    • 1267 Words
    • 4 Pages

    International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Acceptable Accounting Principles (US GAAP) are standard-setting bodies that were established with the purpose of developing high quality, understandable, transparent and comparable financial information that could be useful to the financial statement users. The conceptual basis and many general accounting principles are very similar under IFRS and US GAAP. However, the application of either US GAAP or IFRS may be nevertheless significantly different. Consequently, the differences between US GAAP and IFRS may impact the figures presented in the financial statements of entities and lead to significant variances in financial ratios computed under US GAAP and IFRS.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gaap vs Ifrs

    • 6672 Words
    • 27 Pages

    "US GAAP versus IFRS- The Basics." Ernst and Young. N.p., Dec. 2011. Web. 20 July 2012. <http://www.ey.com/>.…

    • 6672 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Harnischfeger Case Summary

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages

    2. What is the effect of the depreciation accounting method change on the reported income in 1984? How will this change affect profits in future years?…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiat Essay

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    GAAP / IFRS Fiat Group's first-time adoption of IFRS Differences Between Key Accounting Methods Under Italian GAAP And IFRS What characterizes the differences between the two sets of methods? - Substance over form Example: Recognition of revenue - Less flexibility Example: Recognition of R&D cost - More transparent Main factors that affect management’s reporting incentives and strategy in fiscal year 2005 - Research & Development: Because Fiat main operations are based on the manufacturing of cars, they heavily rely on research and development to come up with new models across all brands, with creativity, style, innovation and new technology. - Sales: Sales are very important, and it is necessary for Fiat to implement accounting policies that show sales in the most favorable way. Key accounting policies which are affected by the adoption of IFRS Key accounting policies which are affected by the adoption of IFRS Revenue recognition – sales with a buy-back commitment: IFRS / Italian GAAP Factors might reduce management’s incentive to fully comply with the IFRS Fiat’s key accounting policies Development (R&D) costs Under Italian GAAP, research and development costs may be capitalized or alternatively charged to operations when incurred. So Fiat had two options to choose from, which shows that the Italian GAAP had more flexibility when it comes to development costs. However under the new IFRS, Fiat was required to capitalize research and development costs and also amortize the amount that had been capitalized. Because of that intangible assets who an increase of 2,499 million euros at Dec 31st 2004 Under Italian GAAP, Fiat group recognized revenues from sales of products at the time title passed to the customer, which was generally at the time of shipment. For contracts for vehicle sales with a buy-back commitment, a specific reserve for future risks and charges was set aside. Under IFRS, new vehicle sales with a buy-back commitment do not meet criteria for…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays