Case Study: Green Rope Inc.
Executive Summary
For five (5) years, you worked as a Financial Analyst for Red Wire Corp (RWC). Red Wire Corp (RWC) has been in the business producing wire rope for more than forty (40) years and its share encompasses more than 60% share of wire rope market in the Philippines. You had a chance to experience firsthand through the Factory Superintendent the critical process and specially designed machine that was internally developed by the company. However, you found this uninteresting and eventually forgot about it. Green Rope Inc. (GRI) is a new entrant. It is competitive in terms of prices with the company giant RWC. However, quality wise, GRI’s product is not very good despite using the same materials as RWC. After the stint in RWC, you …show more content…
(GRI) is having quality problems regarding their products.
• How to contribute to Green Rope Inc. (GRI) regarding the mentioned dilemma.
• Does signing a non-disclosure agreement between you and your past employer, Red Wire Corp. (RWC) a hindrance to your current position in Green Rope Inc. (GRI)?
Decision Criteria The decision criteria are the standards that serve as basis to the preferred alternative. The decision should be able to provide a concrete solution beneficial to Green Rope Inc.’s current predicament. It should be reasonable, lawful and achievable.
Assumptions
Aside from the executive summary above, the following are the assumptions made:
• RWC spent a considerable amount of capital and resources to develop the machine.
• This internally developed machine is patented. The patent is currently on its 17th year of registration
• Aside from the machine, the factory workers were trained rigorously to handle these products while following a strict quality control.
• Before working for RWC, I signed a non-disclosure agreement preventing you from revealing any sensitive information and data from
For five (5) years, you worked as a Financial Analyst for Red Wire Corp (RWC). Red Wire Corp (RWC) has been in the business producing wire rope for more than forty (40) years and its share encompasses more than 60% share of wire rope market in the Philippines. You had a chance to experience firsthand through the Factory Superintendent the critical process and specially designed machine that was internally developed by the company. However, you found this uninteresting and eventually forgot about it. Green Rope Inc. (GRI) is a new entrant. It is competitive in terms of prices with the company giant RWC. However, quality wise, GRI’s product is not very good despite using the same materials as RWC. After the stint in RWC, you …show more content…
(GRI) is having quality problems regarding their products.
• How to contribute to Green Rope Inc. (GRI) regarding the mentioned dilemma.
• Does signing a non-disclosure agreement between you and your past employer, Red Wire Corp. (RWC) a hindrance to your current position in Green Rope Inc. (GRI)?
Decision Criteria The decision criteria are the standards that serve as basis to the preferred alternative. The decision should be able to provide a concrete solution beneficial to Green Rope Inc.’s current predicament. It should be reasonable, lawful and achievable.
Assumptions
Aside from the executive summary above, the following are the assumptions made:
• RWC spent a considerable amount of capital and resources to develop the machine.
• This internally developed machine is patented. The patent is currently on its 17th year of registration
• Aside from the machine, the factory workers were trained rigorously to handle these products while following a strict quality control.
• Before working for RWC, I signed a non-disclosure agreement preventing you from revealing any sensitive information and data from