Preview

Case Study: Learned Intermediary Doctrine

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
404 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: Learned Intermediary Doctrine
2. In this case, the New Jersey Supreme Court created an exception to the Learned Intermediary Doctrine. The direct to consumer advertising for Norplant influenced the patient’s decision to request the prescription drug from their primary care physician. The majority stated that the birth control is an elective drug that is decided by the patient and not primarily by the doctor. Therefore, the pharmaceutical company has an obligation to provide the patient with as much information as possible in order to make a fully informed decision.
The Court majority discussed the four considerations necessary for the Learned Intermediary Doctrine to be applied. Per the textbook, these considerations are 1) Courts do not want to intrude into the doctor-patient

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: At a teaching hospital, Mullins who is the plaintiff marked or ticked the section of approval form that consented to “the presence of healthcare learners”. She was assured by the attending Anaesthesiologist that she would handle the anaesthesia. However, when Mullins was unconscious during the surgery, a student (VanHoey) was allowed by the Anaesthesiologist to perform intubation. Mullins’ oesophagus was lacerated by VanHoey as it was VanHoey’s first day practicing on a live patient.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Review the Subacute Care Case Pratt(2010) pp. 122-124 and develop a response to Question 8 a, b c (located on the top of page 125 of the text) and post your response. In your response formulate a complete response to each component of Question 8. The response will provide evidence of critical thinking and problem solving applications. Include one reference in addition to the course text to support your response to question 8 component B. Respond to at least two of your classmates…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court felt that the lower courts were holding on errors and were wide diverging from the establishment of the law. However there was an opinion that the courts error was not substantial and injurious to warrant a grant of habeas relief. The court observed that the court was wring on holding to the idea that the Ake law requirements was satisfactorily met by providing the defendant with a competent psychiatrist . The Supreme Court reported that the Ake law does not only provide for examination but it should also allow for “access to a competent psychiatrist who will conduct an appropriate examination and assist in evaluation preparation, and presentation of the defense…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this assignment you will practice what you have learned in chapters 5 and 7 in the Medical Law and Ethics textbook:…

    • 618 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: olam v. Feirn Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 WLR 582. Document No:C1745651, From Lawtel DatabaseBrazier, M. (1992) Medicine, Patients and the Law. 2nd ed. Penguin books: London, UK.…

    • 3773 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    difffrence

    • 2773 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Assuming that an act that constituted a breach of the standard of care did occur and cause injury to the patient during the surgery in question, as presiding judge, how would you find regarding the two defendants? Please give the rationale for your decision.…

    • 2773 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dcpa Pros And Cons

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In America’s society, advertisements are everywhere. There are many commercials and magazine spreads dedicated to the promotion of doctor prescribed medications. Known as direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising (DTCPA), new information is showing these could be more harmful than beneficial. Marketing of these drugs, unbeknownst to consumers, often takes place before information of long-term safety is known. Furthermore, patient’s views of doctoral qualifications can be undermined if the practitioner fails to prescribe the requested medication. Arguments for the benefits of DTCPA are often outweighed by the harms they cause. Banned in every country except New Zealand and the United States, DTCPA that includes product claims are more harmful than positive.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 5 Psy 480

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tietz, G. F. (1986, April). Informed consent in the prescription drug context: the special case. Washington Law Review, 61(367).…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case presented for discussion described above, it was imminent that Dr. Yarnell had a justifiable medical history that supported his symptoms. Nonetheless, it can be argued the way PA Brian decided to evaluate and treat Dr. Yarnell was biased or based on personal interests. PA Brian’s medical judgment was compromised. Mutual personal motivations existed between Dr. Yarnell and PA Brian. However, as a clinician PA Brian should have impartially evaluated Dr. Yarnell by properly and examining and documenting his findings or properly redirecting Dr.Yarnell to a different clinician. If the patient (Dr. Yarnell) was never appropriately examined, how can PA Brian as a health care provider substantiate that the medication prescribed was adequate and beneficial for the…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical Law and Ethics

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This assignment is being submitted on August 19, 2012, for Carol Taylor’s M230 Medical Law and Ethics course.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Emtala

    • 3841 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Bitterman, R. A., & Fish, M. B. (2009). Sixth circuit: Admission to the hospital does not…

    • 3841 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Macklin, R. (2003). Applying the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29, 275-280. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/docview/216349521?accountid=35812…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plan B Essay

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As reported by the State Journal Register Judge John Belz rule those pharmacists are not required to sell that pill to someone if they do not want to. This comes after two pharmacy owners of Wheaton, Chicago, Luke Vander Bleek of Morrison and Glenn Kosirog of Wheaton who didn’t want to dispense or stock “morning-after” pills or help patients obtain them elsewhere. These pharmacy owners objected to selling the pill because of religious belief but because it was a law that they had to sell it they decided to take it up to the court system with which as we know now that the judge ruled in their favor. Mark Rienzi, a Catholic University law professor and one of the pharmacy owners’ lawyers, said after the ruling. “The law of Illinois and the law of the United States make it clear that people can enter the health-care profession without having to check their conscience or religion at the door.”…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Informed Consent

    • 2404 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The principles of informed consent were laid down in the context of American medical practice in a landmark case dating from the 1914: Schloendorf vs New York Hospital Society (Bennett). Following a surgical procedure was carried out a patient who had previously refused the surgery, the judge ruled that every human being of adult years and of sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body.…

    • 2404 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pharmacists have the vital job to provide their patients with any medications they need or have been prescribed for. However, there may be some medications, such as Plan B or emergency contraception, that are tied to moral beliefs that certain pharmacists do not agree with. This brings up the issue if pharmacists should have the right to refuse dispensing certain medications if they do not agree with them, and to go even further, if pharmacies should have a right to not carry these types of drugs or should there be restrictions on whether or not they must have the drug available to the public. This is a controversial issue, since there is not a simple way to appeal to both parties. This issue also can be extended further into issues with selling…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays