Preview

Case Study: New Jersey V. T. L. O.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
310 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: New Jersey V. T. L. O.
New Jersey v. T.L.O., (1985) is the case that impacted me the most. It is a decision by the US Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of a search of a public high school student after she was caught smoking. A search of her purse revealed drug paraphernalia, marijuana, and documentation of drug sales. She was charged as a juvenile for the drugs and paraphernalia found in the search. She went against the search, claiming it violated her 4th Amendment right against unreasonable searches. The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, said that the search was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.
This case established limitations on our 4th amendment right under school property. The majority opinion should be right one because in order to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222 (1971) Harris was accused of offering in heroin to a covert officer on two events. In any case, Harris took the stand in his own safeguard yet denied the offense, and he asserted he sold the officer two sacks of baking powder. On round of questioning the arraignment utilized repudiating proclamations made by Petitioner to police not long after his arrest. The contradicting statements were made before Petitioner got his Miranda warning. Okay, I understand about the Miranda cautioning not given before Harris affirmation, but rather shouldn't something be said about the proof? Is it accurate to say that it was tested to be heroin or baking…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case brings the question up of was T.LO's rights broken or not. The fourth amendment is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. T.L.O is the person who sued because she felt that the contents in her bag were only found because it was searched unlawfully. In Juvenile Court it was decided that there had been no Fourth Amendment violation. T.L.O was searched without probably cause of any illegal activity. The fact that she was smoking cigarettes in school have the principle no reason to think she is dealing marijuana.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mapp vs. ohio: The surrounding of the case was the police came in her house try to find a bomb suspect they found the bomb suspect but they also found pornograph pics of her self so she was arrested that day. The supreme court's decision was that when a police officer is searching you or your house they have to specify what they are looking for. The courts decision maid a big change because the cops if they come in your house looking for a gun but they find a knife they cant arrest you for it because they have to specify what they are looking for.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1980, one of the teachers at Piscataway High School found two girls smoking in a restroom at the school…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hodel Vs Irving Summary

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages

    3. Hodel v. Irving - (1987) Indian land was being divided under an allotment policy and fractional ownership developed. People were owning 1/100th of a parcel of land and rental income bookkeeping was expensive. So congress said anyone who’d inherit less than 2% or income and less than $100 a year lost his inheritance and it escheated to the tribe. Irving sued because it was taking his property right to give it to his…

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issues: In this scenario a student maintained residence in the town of Trenton, a community that does not have a high school. Students from this area are able to enrolled in Ellsworth or MDI high schools, however, due to behavioral issues the student was placed in a more restrictive environment in Bangor (Parent v. Trenton, 1999, p.2). During the spring of the 1998-1999 academic year the student returned home without “notifying the Trenton School Department of the student’s self initiated change in residency/educational placement” (Parent v. Trenton, 1999, p.2). The student was denied enrollment in both of the available high schools due to his/her intended date of enrollment, and failure to pass a background check (Parent v. Trenton, 1999, p.5). Interestingly, the issues addressed in this case do not consider the lawfulness of the schools’ denial for enrollment, but instead focused on Trenton School Department and if it sufficiently provided the student…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jessica Tice 10/10/17 Dear Dr. Concerned, In response to your questions about the rights of public health officials, I find that there are a great many details to consider. As I am sure you are aware, the United States Supreme Court decision in 1905 on the Jacobson v. Massachusetts case set a legal precedent in situations such as these. The ruling stated that the Board of Health had the right to require citizens to receive vaccinations in order to control a spreading smallpox epidemic . Legally, this supports the rights of you and your colleagues at the CDC to do what you deem necessary to protect public health, even if it may infringe upon the personal liberties of citizens.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mapp v. Ohio is an important case that made history. For the reason it has to do the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment. All evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Federal Constitution is inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court. Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U. S. 25, overruled insofar as it holds to the contrary. Pp. 367 U. S. 643-660.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs. Wainwright

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gideon v. Wainwright, a case involving a indigent man by the name Clarence Gideon, who couldn’t afford an attorney to advocate for him when he was charged with breaking an entry, a felony in the state of Florida. This case not only changed America when the supreme court ruled the government must provide free counsel to accused criminals who cannot afford counsel for themselves, this case as also had a huge impact on my family life and in my decision making when it came to my career path.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Search and Seize Paper

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most famous search and seizure is Mapp v. Ohio. This case happens back in 1961, March 29 and end on June 19, 1961. Which were an unreasonable searches and seizures what relates on the fourth Amendment. When the police received a tip that Dollree Mapp and her daughter were harboring a suspected bombing fugitive, they immediately went to her house and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and under his advice she refused to give them entry because they did not have a warrant. Later on that day more officers came to her door and demanded that they be allowed to enter her house. After Mapp refused, they opened a door to the house through forced entry. Knock down her door completely. Mapp confronted them and demanded to see the search warrant. The police waved a piece of paper in the air claiming it was the warrant and Mapp grabbed it and put it down her shirt. The police eventually got the "warrant" back from Mapp. Also when the cop took the paper back for the warrant for her Mapp was taking a deep thought on how was that was right for him to not let her see the information about the warrant. Next, Mapp was cuffed her feet and went on to search her entire house for the fugitive. When they reached her basement they found a trunk containing a small collection of pornographic books, pictures, and photographs. Mapp said the trunk was left in the basement by a previous tenant and was not aware of its contents. The officers arrested Mapp for violating an Ohio law which prohibited the possession of obscene material. On her arrest she knows the laws for Ohio but they didn’t even give her time to discuss or tell who use to live in their home before her. No fugitive or any evidence of one was ever found at the house. Nothing but pic what Mapp didn’t have a clue who they belong to. At her trial in the Court room, Mapp was charged based on the evidence that was presented by the police. Mapp's attorney questioned the police about the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, Brown contends that he had a firm constitutional right to stand up and support Jennings if he so chose to. As with any Constitutional right, this right must be allowed except when it begins to interfere and infringe on the ability of educators to safely and effectively carry out their duties to other students. Brown v. Cabell, 598.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a town named Vernonia, Oregon, the local public schools faced a major problem regarding the drug use of students while participating in high school athletics (3). The Vernonia School Board were disturbed that drug use increases the risk of sports-related injury (4), so they approved an anti-drug policy, the Student Athlete Drug Policy, which requires random drug testing of the school’s student athletes (5). However, this became a conflict with the parents of a child named James Acton. The parents refused to sign a consent form to allow their kid to take the drug test because they felt it went against the 4th Amendment’s prohibition against “unreasonable” searches (6). The case was dismissed in the Federal District Court and was appealed to the Court of Appeals for the 9th District (7). This court favored the Acton families’ complaint, but random drug testing in public schools was ruled allowable in 1988 in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin (8). The case went on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to conclude conflicting court decisions (9).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lopez was definitely in the wrong in bringing a gun to school, but it should have been up to the state to punish him and Congress should not have gotten involved. I too think that this case kept or court system in check too. If the Court had agreed with Congress then I believe it would have increased Congress’s power. This case showed that Congress could not get away with saying it fit effected the interstate commerce.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Student's Fourth Amendment rights shouldn't be limited in schools, but they still are. In school students' privacy is being invaded legally. There's no warrant needed to search students on school grounds. They could be unreasonable searches. School authority shouldn't be allowed to search students. Limiting rights in certain places is unconstitutional and shouldn't be…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays