Preview

Case Study Of Graves V. Jenny Jones Show

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study Of Graves V. Jenny Jones Show
Graves v. Jenny Jones Show
FACTS
Scott Amedure was shot and killed with a shotgun on March 09, 1995 by Jonathan Schmitz. The incident happened three days after Amedure revealed his homosexual feelings towards Schmitz on a national TV show. This revelation caused much emotional damage and embarrassment among Schmitz. Amedure also left a sexual note for Schmitz which in turn resulted in his premeditated murder on Amedure. Schmitz was ultimately found guilty of second-degree murder and possession of a firearm-felony. Amedure’s parents sued the TV Show, stating the shows actions and negligence resulted in their son’s death. The jury’s verdict compensates the parents $29,332,686 in damages of a wrongful death. The defendants take the case to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ms. Greear stated that Mr. Daubert had kissed one of the female players named Kendra Wallin. He had kissed her once on the forehead and once on the cheek. In addition, Ms. Greear stated that Mr. Daubert had put his hands on Ms. Wallin’s waist. It was not clear from Ms. Greear’s statements if she witnessed the kisses by Mr. Daubert or if she was told that it took place by Ms. Wallin.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4)The case we read in class that I enjoyed the most was State of Connecticut v. Cardwell. I primarily liked it because it best exemplifies the difference and complexity regarding the sale of goods and the helps reflect the distinction between a “shipment” and “destination” contracts. I disagree with the trial courts judgment that Cardwell sold tickets within Connecticut and thereby violated Connecticut statute. However, I agree with the judgment of the court after the appeal. The transfer of goods occurred in Massachuestes, therefore the sale of the tickets, as defined by the code, occurred in Massachusts.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson V Indiana, 435 U.S. 975, 98 S. Ct. 1623, 56 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1978)…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The background of this lawsuit is based on Debbie White suing Patrick Gibbs and his Tavern for the death of her husband . The reason why Debbie wants the bar to be held responsible is due to the fact that Mr. Edward Hard left intoxicated and crashed into Mrs. White 's car and killed her husband . The Gibbs feel his bar shouldn’t be held responsible due to the fact that the bartender didn’t see Mr. Hard intoxicated. Mr. Hard was also an ex-boyfriend of Debbie 's and the bar feels that the accident was intentional. Mr. Gibbs wants the court to dismiss the case based on summary judgment which is “a judgment requested by any party to a civil action to end the action when it is believed that there is no genuine issue or material fact in dispute” (Mosby’s Dictionary).…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Respondent Jones was a subject of a Government investigation in part of a much larger drug trafficking conspiracy. As part of the investigation, FBI agents had obtained a court order to place a GPS tracking device on a vehicle driven by Jones – a Jeep registered to Jone's wife. The court order was issued in the District of Columbia and was set to expire 10 days after it was signed by the judge. On Day 11, the Government attached the GPS device underneath the carriage of the Jeep on a public roadway in Maryland. Effectively, the government was acting outside of its authorization. The device reported GPS tracker data for 28 days after the installation to a Government computer, providing location information for several weeks. This evidence was used against Jones resulting in a hung trial. Jone's was retried and later convicted. Jone appealed, and the D.C. Circuit Court reversed the lower court's finding, citing the evidence was obtained in violation…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jones Blair Case

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mr. Barrett faces different propositions of where and how to organize corporate marketing efforts in the architectural paint coatings market under Jones-Blair Company. Each executive has a different proposal such as: increasing brand advertising, lowering paint prices, hiring new representative or keeping status quo. This executive community still has not decided on which proposition to choose. I recommend hiring a new representative in non-DFW areas.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Case Study

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The O. J. Simpson robbery case (officially called the State of Nevada v. Orenthal James Simpson, et al.) was a criminal case prosecuted in 2007-2008 in the U.S. state of Nevada, primarily involving the retired American football player O. J. Simpson.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Case Study

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page

    Orenthal James “O.J.” Simpson was accused of murdering his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goodman in 1995. Twenty years on, his case still remains controversial, but why? Simpson was a star athlete until 1979, where he pursued his dream of becoming an actor (Harris, 2008). O.J.’s alleged murder of his former wife and her friend thrust him into the spotlight, catching the public’s attention, as well as every news station in the U.S. One factor that makes this case so notorious is that there were many flaws during the investigative process, and a lot of them lead to the outcome of Simpson’s freedom from his charges. Many of these investigative errors could have been overcome with rigorous surveillance of officers on the…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cross-examination is critical during litigation. Many cases have to be proven based on solely witness testimony because of the lack of physical evidence. Therefore, the responsibility of a witness to tell the truth relies on methods to encourage witnesses to maintain their credibility. According to Gardner and Anderson in their book Criminal Evidence: Principles and Cases, the witnesses must take an oath or affirmation that their say will be true and the witnesses must be personally present at the trial in order to ensure the right to confront as stated in the Sixth Amendment. Finally, witnesses are subject to cross-examination. But if it is found that the witness lies, he or she is taking the risk to be charged with perjury or in contempt if the witness refuses to answer a question, unless it is protected by privilege (Gardner and Anderson, 2010).…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonial development along the eastern seaboard was strongly influenced by the geography of the regions settled and the ethnic makeup of the colonists. Generally, the colonies may be best understood as being divided in the following way: New England (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island), Middle (New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware), and Southern (The Carolinas, Georgia, Maryland, Virginia). While these colony groups had many things in common, they also had their own distinctive features. Colonists brought traditions from their home countries and developed new ways of life in North America as they responded to the unique demands of climate, economics, and belief systems. The following is an overview…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anyone accused or convicted of a capital crime, being diagnosed with Mental Retardation can mean a term of life or death. Daryl Renard Atkins was convicted of abduction, armed robbery and capital murder. A forensic psychologist testified that Atkins was mildly mentally retarded. The was tried twice, both time sentenced to death. In the Atkins v. Virginia (2002) case, Supreme Court ruled that execution of such a person constitutes cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the 8th amendment (Bethany A. Young-Lundquist, 2012). Standardized tests were the method used to test intellect. The purpose of this study was the focus on potential limitations of adaptive functioning.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Please accept this letter as a complaint of employment discrimination based on gender by Alice Bennett. Please also accept this letter as an appearance by Marcia Robinson of Auburn University Legal Services on behalf of Mrs. Alice Bennett.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Schiller followed Simpson's case as he stood trial for the 1994 murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ron Goldman. In a new interview with ABC News' 20/20, Schiller reveals that Simpson's lawyer — the late Robert Kardashian — found the athlete standing in his now world-famous daughter's room with a gun in his hand. The incident occurred before Simpson's white Bronco chase.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first amendment in the Bill of Rights states “Congress shall make no law respecting…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays