Case Study Of Groves V. US

Consequently, the same principle did not apply to Groves v. U.S., even though one occupant denied access and the other granted officers consent to enter the apartment. The main difference rests on the fact that Groves and Foster were asked for consent at two isolated times. Initially, Groves was asked during the police officers’ response to the emergency call of gunshots. On the other hand, Foster was asked to grant consent after the police officers returned for a second time and after being denied a search warrant. Their strategic second attempt occurred during a time they knew Groves will not be at the apartment. Under these circumstances, Groves fought to reclaim the rights he felt were violated by motioning to the courts several times to