Case Study Of Yosemite

The planet Earth offers an endless amount of beauty. Planet Earth is a landscape of oceans, waterways, forests, deserts, and communities, which makes up the world in which we all live. Our world in made up of countries, states, and communities, filled with people of many different cultures, societies and ethnic groups, who speak many different languages , practice numerous religions, and have different color skin, yet we all belong to one human race, who shares this planet we call Earth. Every human that inhabits this planet calls it their home. No matter what country you live in, no your matter your faith or race, it is your planet! As the human inhabitants we need to respect and protect its legacy.
To see the beauty of our planet,
With that came contracts and services, which over time, Yosemite was operating like Disney World. With that, although Yosemite is a national landmark and protected by the state of California and the federal government, the Antiquities Act and the Parks Service, the park is currently facing an immediate danger. It is not in danger of environmental issues or changes due to human impact, the danger lurches from “big business” and greed. Delaware North, a company based in Buffalo, N.Y., who ran the park’s hotels, restaurants and shops trademarked the name “Yosemite National Park” and other famous brands affiliated with the park. On March 1, 2016 Delaware North when their contract expired, the company took claim to the landmark’s name, forcing the National Park Service to either buy back the name or rename on the park and the other properties within it, such as the hotels, roads, and landmarks. According to an article written by attorneys Klein & Wilson, on their website, “ The recent trademark has transformed the park, as it can no longer use many names that visitors have come to know, understand and love. It's about as upsetting and unromantic a story as you can think of. It seems like a cliched story, one that accentuates how greed has infiltrated the
Delaware North vs.Yosemite, with the case of Italy vs. Australia , over the The Iceman, Otzi., both cases relate to the rights of property. According to the story, of the The Icemen, Otzi, on September 1991 two Austrians, who were hiking the Tyrolean Alps came across a the well-preserved body of a man frozen in ice. After an investigation, by Austrian scientists and archeologists, nicknamed him Otzi, after the area in which he was found, they claimed him as an Austrian and Otzi resided in Innsbruck. However, after further research,it was discovered that the Iceman was actually Italian, and in 2001 the Italian government demand the return of their 'cultural property