Case Study Ssg Quintana

I was out of the office today, but was informed by LTC Beegles that there were some concerns with the information SSG Quintana provided to you in regards to the rating of the Pilot qualifications for CW2 Dembowski. In this case, SSG Quintana did not rate the resume nor does he rate GS-11 and above positions, however because he is in training I had asked him to convey a message to you regarding the reason for the individual being disqualified. The main reason was due to insufficient information.

Normally, it is not the HRO's policy to provide the qualification standards to the field because they are intended for the HRO/Staffing team use only. However, I understand from a military perspective the employee may be qualified, but based on the current standard we must follow the requirements. The standard calls for specific education, training, knowledge, and experiences; and Dembowski’s resume did not reflect enough information for a determination to be made at this time.
In response, I can only state that most civilian personnel and/or enlisted personnel do not know all the requirements for a Warrant Officer or officer; therefore we can’t assume that an applicant has completed a requirement based on that. It is our responsibility to verify it, if it’s not reflected on the resume. NGB states one "must" have a HS diploma, which is not an HRO rule, but we were simply asking that she add it to the resume. Example: Hogan High School, Completed 1991.

In regards to the statement "The two different jobs you referenced is one position with an additional duty assignment.", if this is the case it is not reflected as an "additional