Preview

Case Study - the Politics of Trade in Steel

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1869 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study - the Politics of Trade in Steel
Case Study: The Politics of Trade in Steel
Do you believe the Bush administration was correct in imposing tariffs in March 2002 on a wide range of steel imports?
At the time President Bush decided to impose temporary tariffs on steel imports, 16 steel manufacturers were operating under bankruptcy and a total of 30 had declared bankruptcy over the prior few years. U.S. steel producers were losing market share to foreign steelmakers in large part due to subsidies and other trade issues. Bush and his Cabinet chose to implement the tariffs because of "the need to speed up negotiations to reduce the world 's huge overcapacity in steel production" (Editors BW Online, 2002, para. 5).The tariffs were the largest trade-protection grant since President Regan had taken similar steps to shore up the steel industry. President Clinton had ordered a study that was done in 2000 with the resulting information "the U.S. [steel] industry was the victim of foreign subsidies and other unfair trade practices" (Editors BW Online, para.7) . Commerce Secretary Donald L. Evans noted that tariffs were needed in order to manage Europe, South Korea and Japan, who were the worst in regard to excess capacity. Conversely, White House Economic Adviser, Lawrence B. Lindley, cautioned that raising tariffs would only make U.S. manufacturers less competitive because it would raise prices, and Secretary of State Colin Powell noted that this move would alienate coalition partners of the war on terrorism.
The EU retaliated on March 27, 2002, by imposing similar tariffs on steel imports to attempt to prevent a flood of steel imports into the EU. EU President Romano Prodi urged President Bush not to proceed with his "protectionist measures" (Editors CNN.com, 2002).
Intended to last for three years, President Bush ended the tariffs on December 4, 2003, one month after the World Trade Organization 's court declared the tariffs to be a violation of global trade laws. U.S. trade Representative, Robert



References: Ackman, D. (05). Bush cuts steel tariffs, declares victory. Retrieved April 8, 2006, from http://www.forbes.com/2003/12/05/cx_da_1205topnews.html Ackman-2, D Editors BW Online. (08). Behind the steel-tariff curtain. Retrieved April 8, 2006, from http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/mar2002/nf2002038_1478.htm Editors CNN.com Editors Ecedweb. (2006). How can big business make money from tariffs? Retrieved April 8, 2006, from University of Nebraska Omaha Web Site: http://ecedweb.unomaha.edu/lessons/feus1.htm Editors ISSB Hill, C.W. L. (Ed.). (2004). International business: competing in the global marketplace (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Hines, W Lehrer, J. (04). Online newshour: steel tariffs ended. Retrieved April 8, 2006, from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/international/july-dec03/steel_12-4a.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John F. Kennedy supported his argument against the increase in steel prices by providing pathos on the hard working Americans, and he explained the situation of the current steel production showing that there was no necessary reason to raise the price. No doubt he made the executives at the steel companies feel ashamed for there dull response to stimulating America’s economy out of “contempt for the interest of 185…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    JFK Rhetorical Summary

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He informs them that it would be difficult to compete with other foreign markets which in this case affects them too. Other countries are not going to buy something that they can get for a cheaper price somewhere else. Kennedy also informs the American people that “there is no justification for an increase in the steel prices” (46-47) making it an extremely important point. Having this piece of information out there makes it more difficult for the executives not to lower their prices because now the people are going to start to question them and the decisions being made. The people will be more involved knowing that the prices should be lower and can be lowered. Kennedy provides a different way of looking at the situation by using…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his speech to the people of the United States of America, president Kennedy uses repetition and offers solutions with a very imperative tone to convey his opinion that steel companies are causing harm by making their prices higher. He continues to argue that in a rising industry, they are the cause of jobs being lost, and that because of them, the country will be further in debt.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President, John F. Kennedy, in his news conference on April 10, 1962 repeatedly called for stable prices and wages in the steel industry during a period of economic distress. This was in an effort to combat the steel companies that had raised steel prices by 3.5 percent. President Kennedy conveys a strong tone in order to boost morale of the American population and persuade the steel companies to lower their prices.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Giant Sucking Sound

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “In the 1992 U.S. presidential election, H. Ross Perot claimed that there would be a "giant sucking sound" as jobs left the United States and went to Mexico under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Why and how does free trade help the U.S. economy? How might free trade hurt the U.S. economy? Choose one side of this argument and support your perspective with the theories presented in the course readings and video resource, Trade: Its Trials and Triumphs, using proper APA forma”…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The President of 1962 brings many things to light about the steel industry that can affect…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For “a tiny handful of steel executives whose pursuit of private power and profit exceeds their sense of public responsibility.”, John F. Kennedy backs up this claim stating that there is no reasonable justification for increasing steel prices, and that there was a consensus that the industry knew to not make “unnecessary [increase] in prices.” Therefore, this says that the steel corporation certainly was negligent and lacked responsibility and ethical characteristics because statistical and reliable sources evidently show that it would devastate Americans. It is important to note the Kennedy uses factual information to his advantage because it serves as proof, thus he gains credibility and would lead people to support his…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    JFK STeel Mill Essay

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his speech to the people of the United States of America, president Kennedy uses repetition and offers solutions with a very imperative tone to convey his opinion that steel companies are causing harm by making their prices higher. He continues to argue that in a rising industry, they are the cause of jobs being lost, and that because of them, the country will be further in debt.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Willow Canyon Hs

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    In his speech to the people of the United States of America, president Kennedy uses repetition and offers solutions with a very imperative tone to convey his opinion that steel companies are causing harm by making their prices higher. He continues to argue that in a rising industry, they are the cause of jobs being lost, and that because of them, the country will be further in debt.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President John F. Kennedy’s speech on April 10, 1962 regarding an increase in steel prices uses several rhetorical strategies such as repletion and imperative tone to persuade his audience that during this economic crisis, steel companies are raising steel prices which is irresponsible, unjustified and selfish on their part. President Kennedy also informs the middle class of America and steel industry executives who is his audience that the rising steel prices will create a further negative impact on economy and will negatively affect every American.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The root of the problem of protective tariffs is that they are almost by definition designed to assist certain segments of the economy. In the era in question, the country was distinctly divided along economic lines. Because a large percentage of Southern capital was put into land, cotton, and slaves, less capital was available for industrial for manufacturing enterprises, since in that volatile period in history they such investments were far riskier than cotton, the prime resource of the booming textile industry. Economists have determined that a reasonable expectation for return on investments in cotton was 10% per annum, an excellent return at any…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his passionate speech held at a news conference in 1962, President John F. Kennedy opened his speech with regards to the large increase in steel prices. Recent to his speech, he had repeatedly calls for “stable prices and wages as part of a program of national sacrifice during a period of economic distress”. Kennedy is addressing the fact that even though the major steel corporations know hiking up the prices on steel will only make America’s economy worse, they still do it for their own “pursuit of private power and profit”, and they are stupid for it.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Minimum Wage Case Study

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My perspective on international trade, free trade, and tariffs have all remained the same and I do still believe that foreign trade is very important because it allows of have a wider or greater variety of goods that we are able to purchase and choose from and I am also for free trade because I believe that this practice contributes to allowing us a greater variety and also lowers the price of goods. I am against tariffs because although they do help to protect domestic businesses and industries, I also believe this may decrease competition therefore causing a decline in the quality domestic products because domestic manufacturers do not have to work as hard on making products more appealing to consumers because the lower price of the good compared to price of foreign goods, which would be high because of the tariff, would simply make to the product more attractive to buyers. If a foreign country can produce an item cheaper than we can produce it, that item should be allowed into the country because rather than having American workers focusing of that producing that item at a higher cost, it allows us to focus on and specialize in specific items that we can produce more efficiently than other countries, which would make us a more globally competitive. I believe that a tariff protects domestic workers because it limits their competition by making their product significantly cheaper than imported foreign products. Tariffs hurt domestic consumers because for example they may force an individual to purchase a domestic good that may be of a lesser quality that a foreign good, simple because they may not be able to afford the foreign good of higher quality. A tariff would greatly decrease a domestic producer’s incentive to get more efficient because the tariff would decrease the amount of competition domestic manufacturers…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Great Depression Causes

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    . “1028 Economists Ask Hoover To Veto Pending Tariff Bill,” New York Times, 5 May…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steel Industry

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Using the information contained in the case, conduct a five-forces analysis of the U.S. Steel industry. What conclusion can you draw from this?…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays