Toomey, who had the most corporate experience of those interviewed, very much felt that the biggest detriment to creativity was poor workers who were uninterested in their job. He explained that he generally enjoyed the way Dyson and its employees worked on projects. A lot of the time he worked on a small team, usually only two or three people, on certain projects. His interactions with senior members of the company were also very positive. He described how other employees supported him when he faced difficulties on a specific project - "A lot of people used to come around and ask me "What do you want us to do?". And these people were more senior than me. But they asked me because I had been on the project …show more content…
"When I started the project, there was three people on the team. Then in the space of two months, the team grew to five. Then, by the time we realised there was a problem, there was forty people across three departments working on it." Toomey was very much of the opinion that creativity flowed best in small teams, he explain that "if a team was bigger than three people, then you wouldn't feel like the project was yours. I think it's important to think that it's yours, because you always want your thing to work. You feel personally attached to it." Organising and motivating large teams also proved difficult. Toomey wanted to construct that small team environment with those from different departments but found it increasingly challenging. "We'd be given three people from the electronics department, but they may have been working on two or three different projects. They also sat in a different part of the building to us. So that almost pits you against other teams. Whereas, we believed that if we got the electronics guys, the research guys and the new product development guys in the same room then we would feel like we're on the same team. We'll communicate with them much easier. But by putting us in different parts of the building and making us come over to one another, it just means that maybe I'll do something that I haven't updated them on yet and they'll find out through someone …show more content…
Newbridge Silver, she believed, took advantage of young jewellers. While she was studying, she submitted six or seven designs to Newbridge Silver as a part of the competition. If the entrant wins the competitions then the will be reimbursed for their designs. However, all entrants must hand over ownership of their designs to the corporation, regardless of whether or not they won. If the company decided to later use the designs, the designer of the jeweller would not earn any money from it. "You might not win, but they can keep your designs for up to ten years. So if you liked your design and wanted to produce it yourself, you can't. For example, if I didn't win last year but they then decided to use my designs in a few years time, then I wouldn't get any money for