Preview

Case Study: US V. US

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
726 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: US V. US
2. The plaintiff the United States of America (U.S.) is suing the defendant Burlington Northern Railway / Shell Oil Co. over its participation in creating a significant contamination of soil and groundwater at the Brown & Bryant, Inc. (B & B) agricultural chemical distribution business. The plaintiff is requesting that the defendant is responsible for a portion of the cleanup cost because the defendant was a Potential Responsible Party (PRP) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). B & B was an agricultural chemical distribution business until 1998 when the company went bankrupt. During this time, B & B expanded its operation to an adjacent 0.9 acre of land that was jointly owned by Atchison, …show more content…
The EPA discovered the contamination of the soil and groundwater in 1998. This site was identified as a superfund site and cost the plaintiff 8 million dollars to cleanup this site. In 1991 the EPA requested that the defendant cleanup the 0.9 acre of land, which cost them 3 million dollars. The court found the defendant liable as a PRP to B & B under the CERCLA and has additional responsibilities for the cleanup of the B & B work site. The percentages identified were 6% for the defendant Shell Oil and 9% for the defendant Burlington Northern Railway for their responsibility for the cleanup of the B & B work Site. Shell and the U.S. appealed. The Ninth Circuit held that Shell had arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance and held Shell and the Railroads jointly and severally liable for the Governments’ costs. The Railroads and Shell …show more content…
In 1999 the supreme court ruled on a case in the same matter as Judge Stevens. There is sum responsibility the company has to protect the environment and those that rely on the resources from this environment. A company that produces an item should in good faith ensure that its customers understand the proper use and disposal of the product. If the company does not know that its customer is not properly using or disposing its product the producing company should not be held liable for the disregards of another company. If this other company that is not properly using or disposing of an item that leads to contamination and is part of the producing company then the producing company should be held liable for any cleanup

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A developer called Riverside Bayview Homes (respondent) owned 80 acres of land in Michigan, and intended to dredge and fill wetlands that existed on its property, in order to build homes. Under the provisions of the Clean Water Act, the Army Corps of Engineers (petitioner on behalf of the U.S.) felt that RBH should not be permitted to do so and filed suit in Federal District Court, seeking an immediate injunction in order to prevent the continuation of this project. The COE felt that the land owned by RBH was subject to jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act because of its adjacency to navigable water, and therefore (under section 404(a) of the CWA) required a permit in order to be dredged and filled. Under the Clean Water Act, a freshwater…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fly fishing outfitter did not have any legal recourses that were discussed in lecture. The fertilizer plant did not violate the Clean Water Act section 402 because the plant obtained a permit prior to discharging the pollutant. Also, the EPA and the state approved all discharge action reported. Additionally, common law claims are inadequate because pollution caused by industrial activity is considered a negative externality. The producer and consumer of the product are not directly responsible by the impact. The cost of the externality does not take into the consideration of the cost of the goods. Likewise, it is difficult to quantify impact and distribute the responsibility equally. Legally, the polluter has no criminal liability due…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ogeechee Fish Kil

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On May 19th, 2011, over 38,000 fish were found dead along an 80 mile stretch of the Ogeechee River near Savannah Georgia in Screven County. This number also included around 15 different species as well. This fish kill was and is the largest of its sort in the history of the state of Georgia. Investigations later revealed that the fish died from columnaris, which can be a deadly bacterial disease when fish have been weakened by other stressors. King America Finishing plant, which is located along the Ogeechee River, became the target of further investigation due to the fact that the dead fish only appeared downstream from the plant, and none were found upstream from the plant. The plant also has a discharge pipe which dispenses into the river. After several visits to the plant pursuant to the fish kill, the Environmental Protection Division discovered that the company had been making numerous unauthorized discharges into the Ogeechee River, of flame-retardant chemicals for over the past five years. Even more surprising was the lack of knowledge that the EPD had of the discharge line, despite the fact that is own inspectors were said to have inspected the plant up to six time since 2006. King America Finishing had failed to inform the EPD that it had a new discharge line, which is required of them under their permit. “EPD rules require companies to notify the department when they want to add new discharge lines, then the state can decide whether to issue a permit. But that didn’t happen in this case, state officials said (Savannah, 2011).” Yet even still, many feel that this is inexcusable on the EPD’s behalf. After the investigations begin to dwindle down and a reasonable conclusion of who was to blame was drawn, the EPD proposed a million dollar payment…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Corporate responsibility, in areas such as compliance, ethics, and law is very significant to the sustainability and profitability of every organization. These areas have become key factors in many of the day to day business decisions that organizations face. It is imperative that management have a thorough knowledge of business regulation and the laws that surround it, specifically in the industry in which their organization does business. For instance, companies that do business close to lakes, streams, or the ocean, must know what environmental regulations exists that pertain to pollution and toxic waste. The federal government has formed an agency that is responsible for enforcement of environmental laws. This agency is called the Environment Protective Agency or EPA. In the following paragraphs, we will discuss how regulatory risks such as tort liability can be identified and managed through certain preventive and corrective measures. Alumina Business Simulation…

    • 511 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch25

    • 2604 Words
    • 13 Pages

    An injured party may sue a business polluter in tort under the negligence and strict liability theories.…

    • 2604 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is about whether the statute is constitutionally valid under the Dormant Commercial Clause (DCC). The State argues that all trucks must be equipped with certain types of protective devices to promote safety on the roads. The cost of the safety devices is approximately $1195 per truck. The Plaintiff, BBT, alone owns 89 trucks in its fleet. The regulation like this would impose a significant financial burden on the company like BBT as well as would put a hindrance on the trucking industry…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1943, during the pre-Cold War anticommunist hysteria, the House Committee on American Activities, after hearings, determined that Robert Lovett and two other federal employees were guilty of subversive activity. To force the executive branch to discharge these three employees, Congress adopted a rider to the Urgent Deficiency Appropriation Act of 1943, which denied the authority to pay salaries to these employees unless they were reappointed with the advice and consent of the Senate. In 1943, the Dies Committee charged him as a communist subversive, over his association with left-wing individuals and groups; through a bill passed by both houses of the U.S. Congress, he was denied he was a Communist, challenged this action through the courts as an unconstitutional bill of attainder.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 12-03

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    FuelSource should recognize a provision for cleanup costs it may incur in Dirty Country in reporting to its U.K. parent under IFRSs and in reporting to its U.S.-based lender in accordance with U.S. GAAP. An obligation has arisen as a result of past occurrences of soil contamination. FuelSource has constructive obligation because of the widely published policy of both…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In SELL v. UNITED STATES, the question was whether the constitution allows forcibly medicating a mentally ill defendant so that he/she can be competent for trial for serious crimes that are non-violent. The constitution does allow this but under certain circumstances. Sell was found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial after examination by a magistrate the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners. Sell decided to challenge the decision made by the Medical center to force the medication on him. Because he was a danger to himself and others, the magistrate gave the go ahead on forcing him to take the medication. This would most likely the best way to bring him back to competency to stand trial…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Inc. case

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    FuelSource Co. causes contamination and operates in Dirty Country where there is no environmental legislation. However, FuelSource Co. has a widely published environmental policy in which it undertakes to clean up all contamination that it causes and a record of honoring this published policy. Thus, it gives rise to a constructive obligation because the conduct of FuelSource Co. has created a valid expectation on the part of those affected by it that it will clean up contamination (IAS 37-17/ASC 450-20). It is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits to settle that obligation will occur (IAS 37-23). Also, the amount of the obligation or loss can be estimated reliably with the best estimate of…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue that arises in this plot is whether the conglomerates are negligent for the contamination of the water supplies of the town, and if their negligence contributed to the injuries (leukemia) of the multiple plaintiffs. After finding that there has been a breach of duty, one must consider if the defendant’s conduct was the cause-in-fact of the…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Environmental law is the important part of government regulation and it deals with pollution or contamination problems. In our case contamination is found within the walls of the factory that was owned by W.R. Grace & Co. Company was using hazardous substances and it has legal duty of care for waste: they had to be disposed or recovered (Business Gateway, 2009). But company failed to do that and all waste was poured out into the water. Unfortunately those burdensome substances negatively affected health of large number of people including workers of the factory, their families and neighbors who lived in the Woburn, Massachusetts. “Ingestion” occurred as people were drinking this polluted water and they were using it for cooking. That region was characterized by large number of illnesses and sick people. Unfortunately contaminated water became the reason of death of children, who died from leukemia. According to general obligation law to environmental contamination caused by businesses, company must pay compensation if its manufacturing processes resulted in contamination and this pollution in its turn caused the personal injury or property damage. (Nelson, 2006) But in our case exposure of hazardous substances in the water resulted in deaths of children and there was no amount of money that can revive and return them to their parents. But someone had to take responsibility of it. The parents sued company as it was legally liable for pollution and plaintiffs tried to prove that defendants knew their operations would cause pollution.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That the Supreme Court exercises a policy making role has been an established fact ever since Maybury vs. Madison defined the Court’s role in judicial review of existing law. By choosing which cases to review and by establishing precedents by way interpretation of a law’s meaning and applicability the Court influences the course of action adopted not only by government but by individuals and businesses who consider the implications of the Court’s actions. In adjudicating disagreements of alternative interpretations of a law the Supreme Court establishes policies which have implications extending beyond the specific case in question and into social policy at large. In choosing which cases to review the Court calls attention to certain issues…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays