Kevin Keays had been employed with Honda Canada for 14 years when he was fired. During his employment, Keays was diagnosed with choric fatigue syndrome and was granted disability leave for about two years. After the two years Keays returned to work, however Honda became concerned when Keays was continuously absent. Honda requested Keays visit with the organizations occupational medicine specialist to further diagnose his condition. Keays refused to abide with Hondas request and sought legal guidance at which point Honda terminated his employment.…
Facts: In 1998, the city of New London, Connecticut, authorized a $3.5 million bond issue in support of plans initiated by the New London Development Corporation (NLDC). This decision followed a state designation of the area as a “distressed municipality” and the closing of a US Naval facility, which employed over 15,000 people. The NLDC plans proposed the development of about 90 acres of land in the Fort Trumbull area of New London. The proposed developments would utilize the 32 acres on which the naval base had been situated, as well as more than 115 privately owned properties. The proposition included plans for 80 new residencies as well as a substantial commercial district…
Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri.…
Is it constitutional to take away money from a person although it was gained for an interview with a publisher about one’s past crimes? Is it constitutional to take the money and give it to the victim of these past crimes? Does this or does not contradict the First Amendment which allows to express one’s mind freely with no discrimination concerning the context? The dispute over the Son of Sam law can be lead down to one question: whether speaking about crime is also a crime. Obviously, there could be two answers, one negative, and another one positive. According to the Son of Sam law, there is only one interpretation: if a…
Acme, which was a national food chain ran by John R. Parks employed 36,000 employees and operated 16 warehouses across the U.S. was found guilty of violations of the FDA. In the early 70's, the FDA sent letters to Mr. Park stating that his warehouse was infested with rodents in the Philadelphia plant. Later, the same type of conditions was found at the Baltimore facility as well. After receiving a letter from the FDA about the inspection, Mr. Parks met with the president of legal affairs to assure him that he would investigate the situation and would be taking corrective actions to fix the violations.…
To understand the question focusing on the court cases of Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education, we must first understand each court case on its own. Plessy v. Ferguson resulted in the year 1896. The case involved the 1890s Louisiana law that basically stated that there were separated railway carriages that were specifically labeled for blacks only and whites only. Plessy v. Ferguson involved Homer Plessy who was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black and appeared to look like a white man. Plessy took an open seat on a white only railway car. He was soon arrested for violating the 1890 law. When Plessy was convicted of violating the 1890 law during his trial, he soon filed a petition against the judge, John H. Ferguson. Ferguson…
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, born Joan Ruth Bader, was born in New York, New York on March 15, 1933. She was the daughter of Russian immigrants Nathan and Celia Bader. Her father owned a small clothing shop while her mother cared for Ginsburg and her older sister, who died of meningitis at age 6. Her mother took a vested interest in Ginsburg’s education. While Ruth was in school, her mother noticed many of the girls in her class were also named Joan, so she suggested that her daughter be called Ruth instead. At age 15, Ginsburg graduated from high school. Her mother died before she could see her graduate high school. Ginsburg met her husband Martin while she was attending Cornell University her freshman year.…
The landmark case that opened up the ability for business to operate across state lines was Gibbons v. Ogden. The case started in 1809, when the Legislature of the State of New York granted exclusive navigation privileges of all boats that moved by fire or stream in the waters within the jurisdiction of the state, for twenty years, to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton (Livingston). They wanted a monopoly on a national network of steamboat lines, but were unsuccessful in their pursuit. Only the Orleans Territory awarded them a monopoly on the lower Mississippi (Livingston).…
McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.…
The case of Thompson versus Oklahoma raises a number of issues regarding the trials and punishment of juveniles for heinous crimes. This case was argued on November 9, 1987 and involves the trial of fifteen-year-old William Wayne Thompson. Along with his older brother and two friends, William Thomspon brutally murdered Charles Keene, his sister’s husband. His motive was revenge for abusing his sister. William Thompson was a “child” according to Oklahoma law, but he was tried as an adult, convicted with murder, and sentenced to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma upheld this ruling. Because he was only fifteen years old at the time of the murder, this ruling violated the Eighth Amendment, causing this case to be brought to the Supreme…
In the case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, the Supreme Court made the wrong decision because a company is not a person and thus does not have the same rights as one. Hobby Lobby employs 23,000 people, all of which could receive all 20 state covered forms of birth-control. The owner of Hobby Lobby felt that certain forms terminated a life, which many doctors disagree with. Hobby Lobby claimed they were being forced to allow employees to receive these forms violated their religious rights and decided to pursue a court case against the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, Sylvia Burwell.…
In 2012, a family called the Greens ran Hobby Lobby, which is a craft store. This family are Christians and have strong faith in what they believe in. Being a very religious family, that they believe that giving or promoting contraceptives, will make them seem as if they are going against their own belief (Oyez, 2013). Contraceptives are artificial methods or various techniques to prevent pregnancy due to sexual intercourse, so the Greens family refuse to provide those things to their workers. This is where the Greens family is furious to give these types of protection to their workers, so they sued.…
Justice Roberts was born on January 27, 1955 in Buffalo, NY. Roberts was confirmed on May 8, 2003, and received his commission on June 2, 2003 By President George Bush.…
Abraham Lincoln once said, “Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties” (Shmoop.com). On September 17th, 1787 the signing of Constitution of the United States of America took place. The members of the Constitutional Convention met to create a strong, centralized government after the dissatisfaction of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution created a government made by the people, for the people, which includes minors. Every American citizen has undeniable rights that are provided in the Constitution and that should also protect minors while they are at school and at home, where they should be able to express themselves without punishment as well.…
When it comes to the Park Doctrine, I agree with the law to some extent. Regardless of the size of the business, if you are the boss you are responsible for everything that occurs in your organization. As a senior leader of a company not only are you responsible for your own mistakes, you are also responsible for the mistakes made by your employees. Arguably, many would say that when he/she took on the responsibility of a senior leadership role to oversee the operations of an organization automatically comes with the responsibility for their employees’ actions. Nonetheless, I believe the CEO should be held criminally responsible especially when substantial evidence exists against them. On the other hand, criminally charging a senior leader…