Preview

case summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
422 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
case summary
1
Case Summary:
This case takes about the problem that happened between a American shipment that was delivered to Germany the shipment was prok levers but the mistake that the six of the pork a male and the German wanted a female so as u can noticed the problem happened because the lack of information and the study of the culture.

Case Questions:
1) In this dispute, which country's law would apply, that of the United States or of Germany?
Germany
2) If the case were tried in U.S. courts, who do you think would win? IN German courts? Why?
American courts: America
German courts: German
-Because it depends on the country of the court that the rules will be applied
3) Draw up a brief agreement that would have eliminated the following problems before they occur:
A. whose law applies
B. whether the case should be tried in U.S or German courts
C. the difference in opinion as to "customary merchantable quality"
What should have done is more studying of the culture and to be more careful and to ask more specific questions to eliminate those problems. Also the contract between
2
the buyer and the seller should have every single detail to avoid such problems also should have the solutions if some problems happened so they would know what to do exactly, and the contract should have which country law will be applied if needed and the properties of the product and how the quality in evaluated and what does quality mean to each part in the contract, so the contract should contain every single detail to solve the above problems.
4) Discuss how SRC may work in this case.
The Safety Regulation Commission (SRC) can advise in order to ensure, through co-operation between States on safety regulation. Also it could try to help solving the problem between the two countries in a good manner way. Also it can make the communication more easy also because it’s a third party it can see the problem in a different point view and judge easier to solve the problem.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Huck was discriminated because he was on a wheelchair and didn’t get the same benefit as other humans who are in the back rows. He didn’t have the choice of seats which was available to others so basically for him to watch a movie; he would have to sit in the front row of the theatre. They also said if he wanted to sit at the back rows, he would have to get up but he’s a disability person. He didn’t have the opportunity like others.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A few things that can happen when resolving legal disputes in international transactions is a choice of law and jurisdiction. Many countries…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The discovery of facts that demonstrate that a valid warrant was unnecessarily broad does not retroactively invalidate the warrant.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. What distinction does the Court make between the cases of Tinker v. Des Moines and Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Case Summary

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In December, Republican North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed into law a bill that limits Gov. –elect Roy Cooper’s power in making appointments by combining the elections board with the State Ethics Commission. The State Ethics Commission oversees ethics laws governing lobbyists, elected officials, and government employees. Under this law, governor successors are only able to appoint 50% of the new board’s members under the requirement that two must be Republicans. Legislative leaders would appoint the other 50% of the new board. Previously, the Governor appointed 60% of the Board of Elections members.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    IV. What would have occurred differently if this case had taken place in the twenty-first century?…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Questions

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The passage above also discusses one court case. Who were the parties involved in the case?…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. If you were deciding the case, how would you rule? Briefly explain your decision.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Landmark Court Case

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    the laws of the country. Many factors determine the outcome of these cases such as the…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Precedent in Italy” in: MacCormick, N. and Summers R.S. (eds),Interpreting Precedents: A Comparative Study (Aldershot, 1997)…

    • 1557 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the fundamental difference relating to their legal tradition, USA and Switzerland are both true federal states. This implies that their judicial organization is, under many aspects, extremely similar. However, the legal system of these two countries varies on critical points or notions, which appeared to me confusing or rather difficult to conceive. In pointing to these differences, I will first focus on (1.) the peculiarities of the federal organization of my country then on (2.) the judiciary branch in Switzerland, and especially on the role and the power of the Swiss Supreme Court. Finally, I will conclude with a few words about (3.) the civil procedure and jurisdiction issues.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is known for quite a long time that there are no international conventions regulating multimodal transport which has been widely used in practise with the globalization of national economies and development of commercial system. Since the Hague Rules, Hague-Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules are unable to cope with multimodal carriage, unimodal conventions will apply to the specific stages of the whole carriage which includes at least two different ways of transportation across borders. Each leg of multimodal transport may attract a different liability regime, making the issue of liability quite difficult.1. It will be quite difficult to define the regulating conventions at the very beginning for each convention has succeed only in introducing another competing international code, with the consequence that the world is currently burdened with three international codes each of which has succeed in attracting different degrees of state support.2 Apart from that, the range between different stages is not clear enough, especially when the loss occurred between two different stages. For example, the loss happened at the port during the time that the goods were unloaded from trucks and then loaded to a vessel, but it was found impossible to localise the loss specifically. Besides, the Hague-Visby Rules and Hague Rules are considered not to be able sufficiently to deal with electronic trade and containerisation, and the limitations of liability are also to be pro-carrier, while the Hamburg Rules are lack of universal application.3 In short, the…

    • 5835 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the case were tried in U.S. courts, who do you think would win? In German courts? Why?…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays