Preview

Case Summery Baroupue V Duplechin

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Summery Baroupue V Duplechin
Park Min-jung (20080534)

Fact :
On June 9, 1974, Jerome Bourque(Plaintiff) was playing second base on a softball game. Duplechin(Defendant), a member of the opposing team had hit the ball and advanced to first base. After his teammate hit the ball, to avoid double play Duplechin ran at full speed into Bourque. As Duplechin ran into Bourque, he brought his left arm up under Bourque's chin. Plaintiff Bourque filed this suit to recover damages for personal injuries received in the collision.

Procedural History: The trial court rendered judgement in favor of plaintiff against both defendants(Duplechin and Duplechin's liability insurer, Allstate Insurance Company). Both Duplechin and Allstate contend that the trial court erred: in not finding that Bourque assumed the risk of injury by participating in the softball game and was guilty of contributory negligence. Duplechin also contends that the trial court erred in negligent. Allstate further contends that the coverage under its policy which excludes injury intended or expected by the insured.

Issue: 1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident? 2. Whether the defendant Allstate coverage was excluded under the terms of its policy or not? 3. Whether the Duplechin's action was intended tort or negligence?

Holding: plaintiff Bourque's injuries resulted from negligence of defendant Duplechin; Bourque was not guilty of contributory negligence and did not asuume the risk of this particular accident; and defendant Allstate did not prove that coverage was excluded under the terms of its policy.

Rationale: For applying contributory negligence, Bourque should assume the risk of Duplechin's collision. Nevertheless, Duplechin's action was unusual and unsportsmanlike conduct. A participant does not assume the risk of injury from fellow players acting in an unexpected or unsportsmanlike way with a reckless lack of concern for others

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Culpepper V. Weihrauch KG

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Contributory Negligence Summary in Culpepper v. Weihrauch KG, ETC.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, M.D. ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS Fitness center member Gina Stelluti sustained various injuries while participating in a fitness class. The plaintiff in this case claimed that her injuries were the result of the defendant’s negligence in regards to failing to repair the broken exercise bike, which had caused the injuries to the plaintiff. The defendant had filed for a motion for summery. The original trial court had granted that request. This request was granted due to a liability contract that cleared the defendant of negligence and gross negligence.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kuehn V. Pub Zone Summary

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL, a business patron.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff Robert Lopez flied a claim against Adelanto Stadium, Inc. claiming negligence on fault of Defendants insufficient design and/or installation of netting protection from foul balls under California Civil Code of Procedure §1714. Compl. ¶ 3. Also, Defendant’s negligence in failure to warn of dangers of foul balls. Compl ¶ 7. Mr. Lopez alleges that Adelanto Stadium, Inc. is liable on the sole grounds that they own the stadium in which Mr. Lopez suffered said injuries. Adelanto Stadium, Inc. moves to dismiss because Mr. Lopez’s claim fails as a matter of law, since it lacks sufficient factual matter to render a finding of negligence.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all actions brought to recover damage for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first element is proven by the fact that FF was driving the car that rear-ended DD and caused the accident to occur and the hitchhiker's death. The second element is proven as well due to the fact that under ordinary course of events this type of accident would not occur if the FF had not been negligent by running into DD’s vehicle. Since both of these elements can be proven by the Plaintiff’s evidence, FF is liable of negligence for the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff Randy Fontenot was driving in the city owned police car at high speeds. When he reached an intersection, FOntenot collided with defendant, Germaine Brooks and Wife, in their car. Fontenot was severely hurt, while Brooks’ wife was killed. Randy Fontenot is sued Brooks and his insurance company, Patterson Insurance. Then the DOTD was added as a defendant in this case because they were responsible for the unsafe intersection. At the trial court they ruled that 90% of the fault was on Mr. Brooks; Mr. FOntenot was liable for 10%; and the DOTD was not liable at all. The Fontenot's the filed for an appeal. The appellate court agreed with the trial courts but they said that Fontenot was not liable at all for the accident. They saide Mr. Brooks and the DOTD were each 50% at fault. Now they have appealed to the Supreme Court.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence applies in this scenario. Negligence is described as a party who fails to act reasonably, even when the act is not intentionally, or it does not intend for harm to occur (Melvin, 2011).…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Lowe Case Study

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plaintiff John Lowe attended a Quakes’ home game in California and his seat was along the left field foul line. During the game, the team mascot was playing his antics behind plaintiff and had been touching plaintiff with his tail. Plaintiff was therefore distracted and turned around toward the mascot. After that, plaintiff returned his focus on the game but got hit by a foul ball. Plaintiff heavily injured because of the foul ball and then brought a suit against the defendant California baseball league. The trail court granted the defendant summary judgement. Plaintiff then appealed the decision.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A “suit” is defined to include a “civil proceeding in which damages because of ‘bodily injury’ . . . to which this insurance applies is alleged.” At present, no suit has been filed against the insured for the losses sustained. Determining whether an insurer has a duty to defend is accomplished by comparing an insured’s policy against allegations made against the insured in a complaint. Under the Section II – Liability part of the policy, a suit is a condition precedent to the insurer’s obligation to either defend or indemnify the insured for liability…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Class V.: Case Study

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (#4-7) According to the case, the plaintiff should not be held as semi liable for his injuries while attending the Daytona International Speedway. My client should receive a decision in his favor because NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway were and are negligent in how races are conducted, the design of the speedway, and the lack of safety barriers to protect spectators, such as my client, from being severely injured during an event. There were several issues that NASCAR and the Daytona International Speedway are responsible for that resulted in the traumatic injury my client sustained. According to my client the numerous problems that resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries are:…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Defendant Summary

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If the Defendants are liable to the Plaintiffs in any respect (which is denied) the Plaintiffs contributed to any loss they suffered…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Torts Assignment 3

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Abnormally Dangerous Activity:
An undertaking that cannot be performed safely even if reasonable care is used while performing it and for which the actor may face strict liability for any harm caused. The courts currently use a list of standards to determine whether or not an abnormally dangerous activity has been undertaken so that strict liability applies.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue that arises in this plot is whether the conglomerates are negligent for the contamination of the water supplies of the town, and if their negligence contributed to the injuries (leukemia) of the multiple plaintiffs. After finding that there has been a breach of duty, one must consider if the defendant’s conduct was the cause-in-fact of the…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruce & Dyer

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Striking a person without their willful consent is regarded assault / battery. An attempt to strike another, as long as there is a present ability to do so constitutes as assault even when no contact has been made. Thus for a charge to be considered an assault there must be an intention to use violence, the power to use violence, and the plaintiff must be in reasonable grounds to believe that they are in direct danger. When the plaintiff (Bruce) exited his vehicle after pulling over and blocking defendant (Dyers) path, and walked towards the defendants car shaking his fist, there was reasonable grounds for the defendant to believe he was about to be attacked. Thus the defendant’s action was out of self defense. The following actions of the plaintiff prove the grounds self defense:…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays