Preview

Cases Crpc

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
187441 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cases Crpc
MANU/SC/0138/1955
Equivalent Citation: AIR43 1955 Supreme Court 171
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Criminal Appeals Nos. 43 and 44 of 1955
Decided On: 07.10.1955
Appellants: Rawalpenta Venkalu and Anr.
Vs.
Respondent: The State of Hyderabad
Hon'ble Judges:
Bose, Jagannadhadas and Sinha, JJ.
JUDGMENT
Sinha, J.

1. These two appeals by special leave arise out of the same judgment and order of a Division Bench of the Hyderabad High Court dated the 15th April 1954 confirming those of the Sessions Judge of Nalgonda dated the 18th January 1954. In Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 1955 Rawalpenta Venkalu is the Appellant and in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 1955. Bodla Ram Narsiah is the Appellant.
Both these persons have been sentenced to death under Section 302, Indian Penal Code for the murder of Md. Moinuddin. Banjardar of Mohiuddinpur within the jurisdiction of police station Penpabad, Circle Suryapet, District Nalgonda, on the 18th February 1953. They were placed on their trial along with three others who were acquitted by the learned trial Judge.
The sentence of death was the subject matter of a reference to the High Court. The two condemned persons also came up in appeal to the High Court which dismissed the appeal and accepted the reference for confirmation of the death sentence.
2. The prosecution case, shortly stated was that on the night between the 18th and 19th February 1953 the two Appellants along with the three others (acquitted by the learned trial Judge) in pursuance of a conspiracy to commit the murder of Md. Moinuddin had set fire to the single room hut in which he was sleeping, after locking the door of the room from outside. P.W. 8, an old servant who was sleeping in front of the cottage outside the room occupied by the deceased, was awakened by the noise of the locking of the door from outside.
Just at that time Moinuddin also called out for him from inside and asked him to open the door. P.W. 8 replied that he could not do so as he found the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Cpcca Case

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are three substantial questions that must be considered in this case; which are, does the charter of rights and freedoms apply to the CPCC, has Tim’s rights been violated and if so, can this violation be justified in a free and democratic society. Section 32 1(a) and (b) applies to the Canadian government and government (parliament/ legislators) of the government and all their authority they are in. Only the government has the ability to violate the charter of rights and freedoms. If a violation has occurred and the charter does come into effect (operation dismantle v. the queen). The charter does not apply to contractors or tort laws as set out by dolphin delivery as the authority; however, the work CPCC is not a contract based as their service to the government is infinitive.To determine whether or not section 32 (1)(a) or (b) applies to Canadian Private Copyright Collective, thereby also putting into effect the charter, one must consider if the five part legal tests…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    These were not speedy trials, so those who were accused of a crime often languished in prison awaiting their trial and ultimately, their fate. This gave them time to reflect on their upcoming punishment or execution. If they were sentenced to death, not only were these individuals going to be executed, but they were also forced to contribute to the spectacle of their death. For example, criminals “were driven from the prison to their deaths sitting with their coffins” (Executions 1). Such a thing would be considered by most as a further insult to injury. In particular the last words of nine different individuals will be examined in the paragraphs below. In order to properly convey these accounts in a historical context we will discuss the individuals in chronological order beginning with the year 1708 and ending with the year 1793, illustrating…

    • 2969 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr. Welch Case

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The killing was unlawful with the reason to be that it was not an act of self-defense or defense of any other individuals. Finally, at the time of the killing, the accused proved that he had…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Case Letter

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR – List what was unfair about the arrest and first trial PG 3…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    ii. After her hanging Cotton Mater a respected minister wrote a letter to the courts to disallow any evidence that came in the form of dreams, or visions. The courts ignored his advice and the hangings continued.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PACE

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1972, the murder of Maxwell Confait came before the courts. Two were convicted of the crime. A report was taken out by Sir Henry Fisher into the inquiry of system failures within the conviction process. The main issue was that of the police investigative processes which were put to blame for the miscarriages of justice this case (Newburn, Williamson & Wright, 2007). The Fisher report raised questions between administrative inquires and the judicial system, however, the report was not just an inquiry about facts of the law, but also a plan for change within the law (McBarnet, 1978).…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal experts say that they’ve never seen anything so ridiculous.“We have never heard of anything of this magnitude before its quite ridiculous.” says one of them.Many of the legal experts do not believe that it was right to place such a sentence in only 2 trials.They don’t think it is fair at all.However some experts say the death sentences placed Monday will definitely be reduced. “Mindless repression still seems to be the order of the day.” is said in the article,meaning that the jury really had no opinion in it because they were scared.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Latimer Mock Trial

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The rules of criminal procedure are highly significant to the defendants because they are designed to guarantee the constitutional rights and freedoms to those individuals charged with an offence. They serve to truly protect the victims, and ensure the guilty are brought to justice. In criminal trials, individuals in the jury wielded real power in the trial since they settle the fate of their fellow citizens by determining the defense is whether they are guilty of some of the most horrendous crimes. Being a member of the jury, my predominant responsibility in the mock trial was listening to the evidence presented by the Crown and the defense carefully. The jury was expected to examine all the evidence deliberately and make judgement without any bias. In order to make the discussion about the trial confidential, the jury were adjourned to the outside of the room to make a decision. An unanimous was made by the jury in order for a verdict to be reached. In this mock trial, the jury decided that Latimer shall be given a sentence of seven years. This decision made by the jury reflects the values and standards of the general public that Latimer do not deserve a more severe sentence. By bringing ordinary citizens into the court and placing them at the very heart of the decision-making process, trial by jury has become the most democratic part of the legal system. Furthermore, I experienced that the court uses witness testimony in an attempt to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offense. During cross-examination, the Crown and the defense asked questions trying to detect falsehood of the testimony or to destroy the credibility of the opponent’s witnesses. By asking questions connected to the witnesses’ characters, the defense…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Gentleman of the jury, be merciful. For God’s sake, be merciful. He is innocent of all charges brought against him. But let us say he was not. Let us say for a moment he was not. What justice would there be to take this life? Justice gentleman? Why I would just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this”. (Chap. 1, pg. 8) My analysis of this story weighs on multiple dynamics:…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What Is Moral Panics?

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The three tenants were tried in court and were found guilty, and were sentenced to be hanged. The three black farmers were in front of an all-white jury. The tenant farmers appealed to the US Supreme Court, which is the highest court in the land. The Supreme Court overturned their conviction, and stated that no one can obtain a confession by torturing someone. They plead Nolo Contendere (no contest).…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial by Fire

    • 725 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In David Grann’s “Trial by Fire,” Grann retells the story of a man’s life on death row. The man, Cameron Todd Willingham, was tried and convicted for arson and murdering his children. This article as a whole is meant to call into question that there was a possibility of Willingham’s innocence, that he might have been wrongly accused. At the end of the article there is a particular passage from the final day of Willingham’s life in which Grann uses repetition and emotional language to suggest that the death sentence is inaccurate. Grann also uses direct quotes from people involved in the case to reveal that because of innate bias, Willingham was considered guilty before the case even started. This reiterates the article’s larger purpose that a man might have been incorrectly punished for a crime.…

    • 725 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R V WORRELL 1972

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The appellant was convicted of the murder of his wife and sentenced to death. On his appeal it was con-tended, inter alia, that: (i) the learned trial judge's directions to the jury on standard of proof were defective; and (ii) the learned trial judge was in error when he held that there was no foundation in the evidence for the defence of automatism.…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury found guilty of murder and sentenced to death in applying standard of reasonableness ignoring race, superstitions, intelligence (words of AD). AD held although belief was unreasonable it was bona fide so culpable homicide rather than murder and sentenced to 18 months of hard labour…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The appellant was convicted of attempting to cause death contrary to s. 215 of the Penal Code. The learned judge held that following some kind of difference the appellant had armed himself with three spears and attacked the complainant. The only question that arose for decision in this appeal was whether the appellant was correctly convicted of attempting to cause the death of the complainant or whether he should have been convicted of a lesser offence, namely an offence under s. 224 of the Penal Code.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deceased was unarmed when the appellant came to the room with the intention to kill her, although she tried to run away when she received the first stab, the appellant pursued her and inflicted several stabs on the vital parts of the body. There were as many as 13 injuries on her body and seven among them were fatal. Thus, we see no mitigating factors and therefore, we confirm the sentence." And to conclude, in Rajendra Prasad vs. State of U.P , the Supreme Court has observed that capital sentence may be awarded where survival of the society is in danger. The Court has expressed its fear that judicial discretion in awarding death sentence may turn out in judicial tyranny and thus, violate Art. 14 of the Constitution. In its opinion, section 302 IPC and Section 354(3) Cr.P.Code, J973 have to be read in the humane light of part III and Part IV of the Constitution, further illuminated by the Preamble of the Constitution. Death sentence may be awarded in the case of planned motivation, white collar criminals, and persons guilty of adulteration etc., hardened murderer beyond rehabilitation or where officers of law are killed by designers of murder. Further, special reasons stated by the Court in…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays