Preview

Castle Doctrine Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
134 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Castle Doctrine Research Paper
I believe that Castle Doctrine is a double edge sword because it gives home owner way to protect their property but we that said in the case of Trayvon Martin who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch should have never happen the kid was not a treat to any property at the time of the murder. I do believe that if someone is in your house and it becomes apparent that they will hurt you and your family you have the right to protect your house but if the person is walking away from your property and away from you it should be illegal to shoot and killed the person. If a person is running away from you it is not self-defense if you shoot someone in the back is not self-defense.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A natural disaster places an immense amount of strain on our civilian population as well as the political leaders who are responsible for their state’s overall well-being. Hurricane Katrina was a perfect example of how bad a natural disaster can affect a single state. Louisiana was in a state of emergency and the state elected officials held all the power to assist in the palm of their hands. At the time of this state’s crises, Governor Kathleen Blanco was charged with this responsibility. Each state’s governor has the authority to enact Posse Comitatus. Whenever they feel that their state is in an unruly state and Marshall Law is needed. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 outlines the right of states, which can affect the wellbeing of citizens.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sanitary Commission was a known profit organization that was sanctioned by the U.S. government in 1861 to help provide supplies and aid to the medical corps. It was not the first organization of its kind but it was the first to have a major and lasting effect on the army. The Sanitary Commission aided soldiers, supplied hospitals with the necessary supplies and provided an efficient means for smaller local aid societies to distribute their supplies. They also created many of the guidelines that helped to shape todays modern medical care and began the project of organizing and recording patients’ needs and recovery times. However, such a large organization that was maintained primarily by volunteers couldn’t buy all the supplies it needed by itself. They of course had the help of those other smaller aid societies scattered across the north and mid-west but they could only supply so much. The Commission needed a way to help encourage more people to give. Especially during the more trying and difficult times of the war when morale was lowest among citizens. So they created what they called Sanitary Fair’s to help raise money to pay for medical supplies, transportation and other essential materials that they would use in both battlefield and camp hospitals.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-defense: To assert this doctrine, the use of self-defense must be both necessary to avoid an imminent deadly attack and the force used must be both necessary and reasonable to avoid that deadly attack. No force can be used merely in retaliation or for revenge.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the article a Castle Doctrine is a theory that gives a homeowner the right to protect his or her home with the use of deadly force. This theory was first started through the common law theory, which wasn’t a written law but an understanding rule. The common law did not vary from state to state but the Castle Doctrine did. Many states have certain requirements of the doctrine which include limitations on where, when, and who can use deadly force. The main requirement that is very important is that you have to be at your own home to use deadly force and be protected under this doctrine. Also, the most important component to this doctrine is to retreat, which means to avoid conflict. Avoiding the conflict such as running away from…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Technological Advances and Ethical Issues precipitating the passage of the Patriot Act and the Federal Information Security Management Act…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Let me take you back to one of the darkest days in American history. Monday April 5th, 2013 in Boston Massachusetts two men by the names of Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokhar Anzorovich Tsarnaev partook in an act of terror on US soil. Two trash can bombs were planted nearby the finish line of the annual Boston Marathon, and the damage these bombs did will forever live in infamy. After the attack, a man hunt through the streets of Boston took place tracking down the men who had commit a mass crime and an act of pure evil. The first of the two brothers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was shot when he was found; however, the second brother was later captured and taken into custody. Now here lies the question, what punishment is appropriate for someone who committed an act of terror, killing three and injuring over 200…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 2005, other states have adopted a Florida style self-defense law that has been known to overlap and fall into three distinct categories, Stand Your Ground, Castle Doctrine or Duty to Retreat. These laws contain provisions that expand upon previous laws to provide additional protection to citizens who used guns or other means of force outside of their home as well as inside the home so long as there is reason to believe that you were in danger. Many people believe that these laws have just appeared out of nowhere or due to the Trayvon Martin case, but in actuality, they have been in the works for quite some time. Take for example the carrying concealed weapons law. The National…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The eighth amendment is defined as “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted (Lectlaw, 2010). This amendment was adopted as part of the Bill of Rights in 1791. The eighth amendment serves the purpose of protection of those who are innocent until proven guilty and to ensure that all persons are treated fairly in the criminal justice system.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The extent to which the Second Amendment applies and the particular laws that go hand in hand with it have long been contested by Americans. One of the more recent debates regarding it involves the Stand Your Ground laws. These laws outline that citizens have “No duty to retreat from the situation before resorting to deadly force; not limited to your property (home, office, etc.)” (“States That Have” Par. 3). These laws have been fiercely contested primarily due to the incident involving George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin in the February of 2012. People are often very stubborn regarding such issues, however, in her article “There is No Need to Change Stand Your Ground Laws” (published November 13, 2012 in the Palm Beach Post), Dara Kam uses her experience covering political issues along with a very straight forward…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Self-Defense Law

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Self-defense laws, also known as “stand your ground laws”, have been a significant aspect of many court cases. However, like most other laws, these laws can be used improperly and cause excess controversy around a case. Joe Palazzolo and Rob Barry’s article titled “More Killings Called Self-Defense” from the March 31st edition of Wall Street Journal brings attention to these self-defense laws. The case discussed in the article is an example of self-defense laws causing controversy, as many protestors believe these laws were used improperly. This is also a common issue as the number of justifiable homicides seems to be on the rise. Are these “stand your ground laws” truly being abused? This is the main issue causing the debate surrounding cases around the country.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment protects the right of citizens to their freedom of speech. There are ways that those freedoms can be taken away. Limitations to this law can be at the work place, when something obscene is said, threats and many others. One way your rights can be limited is when you are convicted as a felon. You often loose many of the rights as a felon, including the right of the second amendment to own a gun. Lester Packingham was convicted as a sexual offender in 2002. He was caught using a Facebook in North Carolina. In North Carolina there is a law to prevent sexual offenders from being on sites like Facebook and other social media sites that minors use. Packingham believes this to be a violation to his First Amendment rights. However, in the case of Packingham there is a government interest to limit his First Amendment right.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to research done by Mark Hoekstra, an economist with Texas A&M University who has thoroughly examined “stand your ground” laws, there are a total of about 14,000 homicides taking place annually in the United States (11). A homicide, in this case, refers to one person unlawfully killing another. That is a fairly high number and it didn’t used to be that high. It has risen significantly since “stand your ground” laws have been implemented into 22 states across the United States. These laws give people the right to use deadly force in a situation in which they feel threatened no matter where they are as long as they have a legal right to be there (Mayors 1). These laws were put into place to benefit our society, but it can be proven that they have not been successfully benefitting our society as a whole because while they do give people the peace of mind that they have the right to protect themselves without fearing the consequences they may have before had to face afterwards, they have also resulted in many more deaths that before that could have been avoided if the person sensing danger had first tried to somehow escape the situation they were in before resorting to violence.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays