Preview

Categorical Imperative Vs Pragmatism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Categorical Imperative Vs Pragmatism
Is the mind the same as the brain, or do we have souls? What is the meaning of life? Does free will really exist? If God exists, why is there so much evil in the world? These are the types of questions philosophers attempt to answer with logic, reason, and knowledge. Some philosophical ideologies that have similarities in how they solve these types of questions are Pragmatism, Utilitarianism, and The Categorical Imperative. Pragmatism is the philosophical ideology that states if a person believes in something and it is practical in their everyday life then it is found to be in the practical consequences of accepting that person belief. Pragmatism can be applied to religion simply by asking is it practical for people to believe in god? …show more content…
In this ideology, minorities are not taken into account. There are two forms of utilitarianism there is act utilitarianism which is at any given moment you must choose the action that is going to create the largest amount of happiness, without thinking about any consequences or about what is right. The second type of utilitarianism is rule utilitarianism which states that we must live by the rules that are created because generally, they are likely to lead to the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of …show more content…
A person may also argue that in some situations it may be necessary to lie, steal, or cheat but in reality, it never is. If a negative outcome comes from disregarding the moral law then it is at that point that it is your fault although, you were just doing it for a good cause. If the universal law was placed on one of the immoral topics then they would contradict themselves and in return be never ending. For example, if someone lies then everybody lies the truth would never be told and there would be no point in trusting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Correct! Utilitarianism is based on the principle of maximizing happiness (or any other measure of utility) for the greatest number of people, as well as minimizing unhappiness for the greatest number. The means of achieving this outcome is not as much of an issue as the actual outcome for the utilitarian.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will first explicate on the theory of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory which states that that which is right is what brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest maximum number of people. The act that manages to fulfill this criteria is the act that is then morally right. As a result, whenever we consider what is a morally right action to do, we have to keep in mind that the action that would make it so that the accumulated level of happiness in the majority would be higher than the accumulated number of unhappiness in a majority. As well, utilitarianism is bias-free, in that the happiness levels of your close friends and family do not take priority over the happiness levels of the neighbors next door, or of people in countries that you have never visited and will never…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sacrifice of minority rights in the pursuit of a happier majority is the obvious route for a utilitarian. The law must be partial to the dominant culture to ensure that the dominant culture can’t be toppled because this would cause a decrease in happiness for the majority of people in a society.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Other than learning hard facts, philosophers can provide answers to life questions that many people may have : on old age, immortality and…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While describing the utilitarianism is concerned with arriving at the most good for all. “According to this theory an individual's rights may be infringed upon in order to benefit a greater population.” (2011) In terms of ethics of a utilitarian trying to make positive change for a larger group. Morally a utilitarian would guide themselves in decision based on the group the belonged to or are associated with.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVERSALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The whole point behind utilitarianism is to find the one action which maximizes utility, meaning, producing the greatest net benefit. When all things have been considered there is only one right action. It looks at what is good for the greatest number which means that it is possible to do something that has a positive net benefit for the majority but may be very harmful to another segment of the population.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All maxims or specific rules of conduct can be judged morally right or wrong according to the general criterion. If universal obedience to a proposed rule would contradict the very purpose of the rule, as is the case for rules that under certain circumstances permit lying, stealing or taking life, then the rule cannot be part of a true moral code. In contrast, a rule such as “Do not make false promises” can in principle be followed without exception and thus qualifies as a moral duty.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Timeless questions asked in different ways. What are morals? And if any who decides what is right or wrong? The answers we get vary depending on who is asked or which theory we believe to be true. Whether the universal theory or the ethical relativism; The fundamental difference in these theories is defined in their names universal theory believe that morals are universal and ethical relativism reason that ethics is relative depending on the views of the people during that time period and the who you ask. We will be exploring what it means to be an ethical relativist, its principles, strengths and weakness, and if this theory is valid.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is amongst the most famous moral theories to argue social issues. Developed by Jeremy Bentham, Utilitarianism is a belief that welfare and happiness should be maximized. Bentham believed that the morality of an action was determined by how much overall utility resulted from that action. Following were philosophers like include John Stuart Mill and John Rawls who mentioned that utilitarianism was a moral theory that could be used to justify inequality. Utilitarianism however is perhaps the most efficient theory to approach normative ethics. This consequential theory is understood to hold that the right action will always produce the greatest good. It is not concerned with the means to achieve the greatest good but how much good is produced. So, to refer back to Rawls’ comment, utilitarianism is a theory most commonly effective to argue against inequality since both Bentham and Mill will agree that, the action that produces ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’ will always be the right action. Because utilitarianism in all emphasizes social welfare, it is best to acknowledge that the rising income inequality in the United States is unethical.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy which seeks to maximize well-being for the largest amount of people. This means that if you can secure pleasure at no moral cost, you should do so. It also means that if you can prevent displeasure for others without sacrificing anything of equal moral value, you should. In Utilitarianism the key is the well-being for the entire population.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, when making a decision you should focus on the outcome and determine what decision will deliver the best consequences. As a result, just like any other theory in existence utilitarianism brings about a number of objections specifically because it determines your actions based on consequence and this can become trivial in many types of scenarios. Overall, after reviewing the numerous objections there are two that stand out over the others, Utilitarianism is too demanding and that it disrupts our personal relationship. Utilitarianism does seem to be too demanding, if we all acted based on doing things that bring everyone happiness it would eventually take from our personal happiness. How is one to not go to a movie or spoiling themselves with an expensive handbag if the other choice of spending that money would be to donate to charity or what society considers a greater cause. Donating money to a greater cause would indeed bring more units of happiness than the one unit would bring to me personally if I choose to purchase my expensive designer bag versus donating that money. This can ripple into not only this aspect of everyday personal life. Imagine not driving a car because of the pollution, overall that decision would cause greater good to the planet but that idea is just not feasible, especially in our city where commuting is a part of life not a choice. The second is that the utilitarianism theory can disrupt our personal life. The idea of treating my husband or family as I treat a complete stranger is simply unrealistic. Utilitarianism asks that you make impartial decisions and in normal human “animal” emotions that is unnatural. Animal instinct even in the wild make biased decisions, a lion knows when a cub is its cub and acts in defense and protection of it, human instinct is the same. These two objections simply provide evidence that utilitarianism…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actions are evaluated in terms of the good consequences generated relative to the agent. It is the only consideration relevant to determining whether or not an action is right or wrong. Utilitarianism, like ethical egoism, holds that we ought to do what has the best consequences, however utilitarians believe that the scope of relevant consequences is much broader. Egoist count only their own well-being, while utilitarians count the well-being of everyone. Utilitarianism is egalitarian in that it believes that everyone’s wellbeing is equal; no one persons’ well being is above anyone else’s.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequentialism is all about the ‘actions of consequences,’ which are based on justification. The people that favored affirmative action for consequences, for them it works until it produces the greatest happiness for the largest number of individuals. ‘Utilitarianism and Egoism’ are both forms of consequentialist. Utilitarianism is defined as the ‘principle of utility or the greatest happiness principle,’ which means that utilitarianism is based on consequences of the actions and always produces the greatest happiness for the more significant number of people. If the actions are wrong, it can also provide the reverse happiness for people meaning it could also harm them. The example that we have seen about utilitarian was about ‘trolley problem,’ where five workers were working on one track and only one worker on the other…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays