Catfish Documentary Essay

The film Catfish, directed by Ariel Schulman and Henry Joost, changes our understanding of the truth about the media. After watching the film Catfish, the audience questions if the composers are controlling the truth about the media or showing what really happened. It is questionable that the directors would be able to record scenes that were significant enough to use in the documentary. Lastly, the responders are considered if the composers include and exclude different scenes in the media.

The film Catfish changes the way responders think about media and makes them question whether the composers control the audience’s view of the truth. To film news reports about crime or dangerous events, directors would have to film constantly to get every bit of information. But news reports can’t always get everything and missed parts of the action. So they re-act the situation, which means parts of the information are changed or not revealed, leaving the audience with the wrong information. This can make the responders question if the composers control the truth in media. In the film Catfish, the composers have given us information that was not reliable. The chat website Megan gave to Nev wasn’t real, which tells us that the conversation and web chats were fake. Some news articles can be a bit unbelievable because the situation is predictable. Because of this, the audience questions if the composers are manipulation the whole thing. In Catfish, the plot of the documentary is a very common and predictable situation that happens in fiction books and movies, making it hard to believe that this situation really happened in the film. These examples from Catfish allow the audience to raise questions about the truth in media.

In the film, questions were raised about having enough information in the recorded scenes to use in the documentary. To get the information they need, news reporters interview people who have witnessed the scene or have knowledge about the topic. Since the